Just for sh!ts and giggles I would react as such:
As far as the projection, it just goes to show that the ones who point their fingers are the ones with the filthy hands.
Posted on 10/21/2016 9:02:30 AM PDT by ColdOne
fullt title................'I am the least racist person you've ever met!' Furious Trump WALKS OUT of interview when reporter asks him about sexual assault and race claims............Donald Trump walked out of an interview with a local television station after he was asked about being labeled a racist and sexist during the course of his campaign.
Moments before addressing a packed house at the Delaware County Fairgrounds in Ohio, Trump talked with NBC4’s Colleen Marshall about the end of the race to the White House.
'Nineteen days out from the election, you've been labeled a racist, you've been called a sexist, how...' Marshall began to ask the Republican presidential nominee.
But Trump didn't let the reporter finish, simply saying 'Thank you very much' before he began to walk away.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
Sounds to me more like they were evaluating you only on your looks, not on behavior & results.
Like saying you’re black, you must be lazy and stupid...
or,
You’re female, you must be flighty and hysterical...
or
You’re a Jew so all you want is money...
or
You’re Chinese so you must be a terrible driver...
All of these are same as
“you’re a white male, therefore you’re a racist misogynist.”
It’s about time.
L
Is that old boiler still on the air?
“’I am the least racist person you’ve ever met!’ Furious Trump WALKS OUT of interview when reporter’
Another box of rocks “co=called news person” that neither knows or understands the issues so it falls back on what she hears on MTV.
Holy Water, antibiotics, garlic, and sheep dip.
Nothing But Clinton
They don’t have any truth to attack Trump with so they use the old boogymen racist bigot etc. The problem for them is that he won’t smile and take it like the weenie Republicans before him.
She’s got an overbite like Marge Simpson.
The media has become over run with low IQ Democrat activists. They are very stupid, poorly mannered, in the tank supporters of anything Democrat.
The bias has become so overwhelming that they are driving Independents to Trump.
And if Mrs. Clinton accuses me of having made my money holding up banks, am I supposed to waste time discussing that as an issue? I came here to talk about America's future, not dignify insults."
That a woman who has been politically active, her entire adult life, among a people with the most successful history of economic achievement over their first century and a quarter, of any people on earth, under a Constitutional Government designed to protect that people from a bureaucratic pestilence, which has been the bane of most nations; that such a woman has so missed the essential point of the American achievement, is staggering in its implications.
Mrs. Clinton claimed that a Clinton Government would rebuild the "Middle Class." Was she totally unaware that the American Middle Class clearly built itself? That the American Middle Class resulted from naturally energized individuals, aspiring to achieve the good life, who risked everything to first clear a wilderness, work hard, generation to generation, to save & accumulate the attributes of the good life; with the result that by 1913--the year that a graduated income tax first became Constitutional, this Settler built Federation of newly settled States, had already surpassed every one of the great powers of Europe in industrial strength.
To "rebuild" the "Middle Class," Mrs. Clinton vowed to make the most successful Americans--those who had achieved the most--pay increased taxes; she called it "paying their 'fair' share." But it was clearly to be a tax on success--a tax to fund a raft of new programs (a cancer or pestilence of an expanded bureaucracy). She was obviously indifferent to the fact that the biggest impediment to any poor person with ambition, actually launching a small business to improve his status, is an almost incomprehensible explosion in bureaucratic regulations, most of which premised on the same flawed understanding of how people actually advance, which Mrs. Clinton displayed, last night.
Americans used to learn by experience. What were the experience based lessons of what transpired from the drafting of our written Constitution in 1787, until the passage of the income tax amendment in 1913? Are they instructive or not, for what actually works for human advancement?
The Constitution prior to 1913, absolutely interdicted a tax driven war on the accumulation of individual wealth. Article I, Section 9, which Mrs. Clinton should have remembered from Law School, provided that no direct tax on individual Americans could be applied in any way but pro-capita. (That is Warren Buffet would pay the same tax--not the same percentage tax--but the same tax as Joe the Plumber. The Founders had no desire to limit individual success. They sought only to encourage it.
Under there experience based philosophy, there were almost certainly not even 1% of the bureaucratic regulations, with which Americans seeking to improve their lot, must face today. In place of today's pursuit of grievances, real or imagined, there was universal admiration for the high achievers! And the growth rate of a people freed to achieve, was the economic phenomenon of human history.
We do not pretend to know whether it was in her indoctrination by Marxist Pied Pipers, in her late teens, or pure confusion in whatever she is struggling with today. But Mrs. Clinton is utterly clueless on how a dynamic economy works; as she is utterly unaware of the dynamic, interactive factors, that drive or stagnate any human aspiration or achievement. What is absolutely clear, even if one ignores her lack of a moral compass in her political dealings; the woman is absolutely unqualified to be President of the United States.
This is one more reason why we must win this election for Donald Trump.
William Flax
[This may be reproduced, if in full context, with or without attribution.]
Bottom Photo:
Podesta replaces the position of Merrill.
Yes, it’s pathetic when pols like Hillary tell me things like they are going to “invest” in me? What the heck does that even mean AND I don’t want that, I prefer to invest in myself so stop taking my money so you can spread it around on wasteful programs designed for one thing - to make government bigger.
Bttt.
5.56mm
If we are to continue as a free people, then everyone better get their rear ends in gear and ensure a Trump victory!!
Tune out the propaganda polls and the MSM, GOPe, and RAT bull crap. If we do not ensure a Trump victory, bend over and kiss your freedom goodbye and your children and grandchildren’s future goodbye as well. It’s that dire and that important; 1776 all over again or like the day we were attacked at Pearl Harbor. We must win. Report and document all voter fraud. Get everyone you know out to vote and vote Trump. Defeat the enemies within.
Damn!! she thought she was makin a difference
Anyone that thinks Trump is a racist is uninformed at best.
The typical Republican would have been cringing, crying, and begging forgiveness at that point.
Trump’s definitely The Man of the Hour for this Country. Glad he’s there.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.