Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Breaking: Hillary Clinton Sent Information Marked Classified (Fox News report)
The Observer/Fox News ^ | 06/11/16 10:15a | By Austin Bay

Posted on 06/11/2016 6:59:01 PM PDT by drewh

Fox News proves that emails marked 'Confidential' were among those stored and forwarded by former Secretary of State.

Once again Hillary’s been caught lying about her criminal mishandling of classified national security information. Recall that Ms. Clinton swears none of the emails which passed through her off-the-record email server system was ever marked classified.

Fox News gets the credit. In an exclusive report published June 11, Fox News revealed that one of Ms. Clinton’s emails had a “portion marking” that identified the specific information contained in the “portion” as being classified. That means the information was sensitive and was legally protected.

The information had the lowest level of classification, Confidential. It discussed a phone call with the president of Malawi, Joyce Banda. Fox News included an information-rich screen shot of the email.

Let’s take a quick trip through the email. The original email with the classified information marking was sent on April 8, 2012, when Clinton was still the Secretary of State.

The original email has an uncomfortable typo, given Benghazi, where people died then Hillary lied. The sender, Monica Hanley, clearly meant time “windows” but, well, here’s the typo. Should the 7:30 AM time window not work for Clinton “we will find other widows that work for you tomorrow.”

Hanley cc’d Huma Abedin, one of Clinton’s chief accomplices.

Follow the trail of evidence: Clinton appears right there in the email thread, responding on April 8, 2012 at 10:37 pm. “7:30 works for me,” Clinton writes, confirming she has an available time “widow” for a phone call whose purpose is classified CONFIDENTIAL.

(Excerpt) Read more at observer.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Government; US: New York
KEYWORDS: 2016election; classifiedemails; clintoncrimefamily; crookedhillary; election2016; hillary; hillarycriminalprobe; hillaryemails; jw; newyork; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last
To: drewh
Not a lawyer but what about this https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2071 (a) Whoever willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, or destroys, or attempts to do so, or, with intent to do so takes and carries away any record, proceeding, map, book, paper, document, or other thing, filed or deposited with any clerk or officer of any court of the United States, or in any public office, or with any judicial or public officer of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both. (b) Whoever, having the custody of any such record, proceeding, map, book, document, paper, or other thing, willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, falsifies, or destroys the same, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both; and shall forfeit his office and be disqualified from holding any office under the United States. As used in this subsection, the term “office” does not include the office held by any person as a retired officer of the Armed Forces of the United States. (June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 795; Pub. L. 101–510, div. A, title V, § 552(a), Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 1566; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, § 330016(1)(I), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.) NOTE: "and shall forfeit his office and be disqualified from holding any office under the United States"
21 posted on 06/11/2016 7:35:31 PM PDT by blueyon (The U. S. Constitution - read it and weep)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: randita

Yep, but the rules that apply to you and I never seem to catch up with the Clintons.


22 posted on 06/11/2016 7:37:44 PM PDT by Scutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: mrsmith

I guess the only question I have is:

It looks like it was marked “Classified” on 1/29/2016 but the email seems to have been sent on 4/9/2012.

Isn’t Hillary going to claim that it wasn’t “Classified” on the send date?

I thought that was the excuse she has been using all along or am I reading this incorrectly?


23 posted on 06/11/2016 7:38:24 PM PDT by davandbar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: drewh

What did FBI Comey know about this and when did he know it? And now that it’s public, why hasn’t he done anything about it.

President Trump will need to appoint a special prosecutor to investigate Comey and other FBI agents to see what crimes, malfeasance, misfeasance, or nonfeasance they may have committed.


24 posted on 06/11/2016 7:40:27 PM PDT by Carl Vehse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: txrangerette
It convenient fiction that the Clinton’s are “husband and wife”

Yes, I know. I'm nitpicking the fact that the MSM has lately gotten into the habit of using the suffix, Ms, to label married women.

If you ask me, they're embarrassed to call any woman a 'Mrs', lest they violate the doctrine of political correctness. Oh, the horror!

25 posted on 06/11/2016 7:40:37 PM PDT by Windflier (Pitchforks and torches ripen on the vine. Left too long, they become black rifles.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: drewh
The fix is in. Nothing will happen to Hillary. King Obama has thrown the protection umbrella over her. And when the King speaks, the communists black Muslim terrorists, you better listen. She is free.
26 posted on 06/11/2016 7:43:23 PM PDT by Logical me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gaijin

So is the Magic Negro that magic?

Such a structure bodes to be cumbersome, and cannot keep up with the relatively agility of Trump’s.


27 posted on 06/11/2016 7:44:54 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Logical me

Versus Trump And The Angry White Men...

this will get interesting.


28 posted on 06/11/2016 7:45:55 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Windflier

It’s hatred of a caricature of the idea of the husband owning the wife as property.


29 posted on 06/11/2016 7:47:14 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Carl Vehse

The fox will just have to see who it is that has raided the henhouse.


30 posted on 06/11/2016 7:47:56 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: gaijin
Hillary will NOT be Bill’s “Third Term” —she will be OBAMA’s.

If this take Hillary down, it would take Obama down too. Obama's conflict of interest is getting more obivious.
31 posted on 06/11/2016 7:49:37 PM PDT by Seven_0 (You cannot fool all of the people, ever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Windflier

Neither is “Ms.” a suffix nor does it denote an unmarried woman.


32 posted on 06/11/2016 7:51:51 PM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: drewh

In the 30 years of working with classified information, I would have lost my job (at a minimum) for doing less than what Hillary has done. Instead, half this country supports this traitor. Sigh.


33 posted on 06/11/2016 7:59:48 PM PDT by CatOwner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: davandbar

Supposedly it’s a copy of the email she received.
I don’t understand either how an email sent in 2012 could have a classification date of 2016 on it at the time!

Something is amiss.


34 posted on 06/11/2016 7:59:48 PM PDT by mrsmith (Dumb sluts: Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat/RINO Party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: drewh

is this story for real?

why wasn’t this spotted earlier?


35 posted on 06/11/2016 8:11:50 PM PDT by RockyTx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: drewh
More BULLSHIT that will go NOWHERE...again.

C'mon guys...she ain't going to jail, she'll never be prosecuted.

Barky will protect her 'til the bitter end.

Let's concentrate on getting out the Trump vote...whip her considerably wrinkled old ass at the ballot box, 'cause she will be the nominee and she will be on the dimrat ballot.

Let's work on the voting against her, 'cause she will never be prosecuted, she'll never answer for her lies, Benghazi, TravelGate, CattleGate...Vince Foster, you name it...she will always walk free, let's make sure the bitch doesn't walk in the White House.

36 posted on 06/11/2016 8:12:14 PM PDT by OldSmaj (Voting for Hillary because she is a woman is like eating a turd because it looks like a Baby Ruth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mrsmith

Isn’t Hillary claiming that she never sent or received emails that were marked classified “at the time?” My understanding is that the State Dept. can mark something classified at any time. It just seems like this is one of those times.

Unfortunately, I don’t see any smoking gun on this one—it just looks retroactively marked classified—which fits into her convenient excuse (or am I still missing something?).


37 posted on 06/11/2016 8:19:00 PM PDT by davandbar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker

“Neither is “Ms.” a suffix nor does it denote an unmarried woman.”

Sorry, I meant prefix, and yes, the term was coined in the 1970s to denote an unmarried woman who is too old to be considered a Miss.

I’m old enough to well remember the introduction of that term.


38 posted on 06/11/2016 8:19:10 PM PDT by Windflier (Pitchforks and torches ripen on the vine. Left too long, they become black rifles.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: OldSmaj
C'mon guys...she ain't going to jail, she'll never be prosecuted.

Without the constant drumbeat from the MSM night after night you are correct she Skates

Sad to say but even today with the internet and Talk Radio the MSM ABC-CBS-NBC WAPO and NYT still control the issues
39 posted on 06/11/2016 8:25:20 PM PDT by uncbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: mrsmith

The Portion Marking was in the original email (which meant that the email was classified when sent). The 2016 marking is from where the FBI or State reviewed the email and marked it. But the portion marked with a C was classified as confidential when it was sent in 2012. Clear as mud?


40 posted on 06/11/2016 8:28:53 PM PDT by PrairieDawg (#NeverHillary or Warren or Biden or ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson