Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: davandbar

Supposedly it’s a copy of the email she received.
I don’t understand either how an email sent in 2012 could have a classification date of 2016 on it at the time!

Something is amiss.


34 posted on 06/11/2016 7:59:48 PM PDT by mrsmith (Dumb sluts: Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat/RINO Party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]


To: mrsmith

Isn’t Hillary claiming that she never sent or received emails that were marked classified “at the time?” My understanding is that the State Dept. can mark something classified at any time. It just seems like this is one of those times.

Unfortunately, I don’t see any smoking gun on this one—it just looks retroactively marked classified—which fits into her convenient excuse (or am I still missing something?).


37 posted on 06/11/2016 8:19:00 PM PDT by davandbar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

To: mrsmith

The Portion Marking was in the original email (which meant that the email was classified when sent). The 2016 marking is from where the FBI or State reviewed the email and marked it. But the portion marked with a C was classified as confidential when it was sent in 2012. Clear as mud?


40 posted on 06/11/2016 8:28:53 PM PDT by PrairieDawg (#NeverHillary or Warren or Biden or ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson