THE REAL ENEMY...
Posted on 03/28/2016 12:29:17 AM PDT by vikingrinn
Talk-radio star, presidential candidate to settle beef 'once and for all'
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
please, let's stay focused on the real enemies and get back on point savage... ;)
Savage has always been rather unstable. I always dismiss him when he goes off the rails and just wait for him to get back to the good stuff. It’s like having a crazy uncle (I did have one. He had schizophrenia. He’d argue with himself all the time). You just wait for the insanity to subside before you deal with him again, and you don’t take it too seriously when it happens.
What a blowhard loser. He has NO evidence that Trump put the Enquirer up to this, and in fact all evidence shows that the information and associated video were compiled by the Rubio camp and has been known about by everyone ‘in the know’ for at least a month. This is what you get when you give an idiot with an ego his own radio show.
Maybe he’s hopping on the ratings gravy train?
Exactly.
Hill ^ | March 27, 2016, 10:56 am | Rebecca Savransky Posted on 2016-03-27, 6:17:14 PM by Red Steel
Republican presidential front-runner Donald Trump on Sunday slammed rival Ted Cruz for the recent ad produced by an anti-Trump super-PAC featuring a photo of Trump's wife posing nude.
"From what I hear, he and his campaign went out and bought the cover shoot. Melania did a cover story for 'GQ,' a very strong modeling picture. No big deal," Trump said on ABC's "This Week."
"But it was a cover story for 'GQ,' a big magazine. And it was, you know, fine. And from what I hear, somebody bought the rights to it and he was the one or his campaign bought the rights and they gave it to the super PAC."
Trump said Cruz knew about the ad, adding he started the latest fight between the two. Last week, Trump threatened to "spill the beans" on Cruz's wife in response to the ad featuring Melania Trump. He then shared a tweet featuring a photo of his wife next to a photo of Cruz's wife, stating, "A picture is worth a thousands words."
Cruz has denied knowing anything about the ad, and called it deplorable on Sunday.
But Trump said the super PAC that produced the ad is "very friendly to Ted Cruz."
"He knew all about it, 100 percent," he said.
"There's no way in a million years that super PAC did that without his absolute knowledge."
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3414491/posts?page=1
Of course National Enquirer loves Trump he’s the only one who will bring up the Clinton scandals and anyone else’s scandals.
If National Enquirer came out and attacked Trump that’s when you would really start to wonder who is being bought off.
Trump has some tepid support from the 2 of the more reputable & serious media types : Tabloids & Talk Radio.
A Sex Scandal? Who Cares? [News was out there six months ago. Trump did nothing about it.]
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3414087/posts
American Spectator
F.H. Buckley
NOTE: Trump could have used it in the Bible Belt. Too late for maximum effect.
‘Maybe he’s hopping on the ratings gravy train?’
Fine by me. Mark Levin needs the competition.
I have it even worse — from 5-6, a Glenn Beck rerun. After that, Joe Pags. I’ve never heard him say anything worthwhile yet.
I used to like GB oh maybe ten years ago.
He is so gone now.
Just plumb crazy.
“Maybe he’s hopping on the ratings gravy train?”
Hell yeah. It’s about time our guys start using the same tactics to destroy the enemy who have enjoyed beating our asses with it for so long.
Here is the link to the WND article. Savage ping!
Even on FR the real enemy is ignored.
Savage at least wants to hear Trump’s side but aside from that he is almost our Beck.
“The National Enquirer CEO David Pecker is a close friend of Donald Trump. They have endorsed Donald Trump for president and this entire campaign they’ve done two things, one, they praise Donald Trump at every turn.” newsmax.com
Senator Ted Cruz Caught Blatantly Lying On Fox News Sunday… from theconservativetreehouse.com, is a highly biased commentary, a classic hit-piece against Cruz. The “LyingTed” Trump talking points are obvious. Cruz was ahead in Utah by double digits before the super-PAC ad. He didn’t need the ad and the ad didn’t end with Cruz’s endorsement, did it?
I read the Mission Statement at theconservativetreehouse.com. The rhetoric is mostly poetic salutations, individual liberty, self empowerment (sounds weird) natural law, ok, but no clear positions on lower taxes (flat tax), smaller Gov’t, less regulations, energy independence from domestic sources of oil and gas, pro-life, global warming is mostly natural, pro-Israel, pro-Military, balanced budget, more state and local on education, etc. I don’t want to trash the website but from what I have read so far, I don’t see real conservatism or even a basic understanding of conservatism. BTW, Trump is against finishing the XL Keystone pipeline.
-Frank
I see no evidence that Trump uses sex scandals against folks. Think of his strong support for Petraeus. Think about how many times he's said that he would use really nasty people to do trade deals if they were the ones who would get the job done.
Savage did say he would still vote for Trump in the election.
Today Savage will see Trump was setup by busTED sCruz.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.