Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

19 Facts About The Deindustrialization Of America That Will Make You Weep
Business Insider ^ | 9/27/10 | Michael Snyder

Posted on 03/20/2016 2:57:17 PM PDT by central_va

The United States is rapidly becoming the very first "post-industrial" nation on the globe. All great economic empires eventually become fat and lazy and squander the great wealth that their forefathers have left them, but the pace at which America is accomplishing this is absolutely amazing. It was America that was at the forefront of the industrial revolution.

(Excerpt) Read more at businessinsider.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: deindustrialization; economy; free; globullists; postindustrial; suck; traitors; uscrisis
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 261-274 next last
To: central_va

Yep. Isn’t that what I said?


181 posted on 03/20/2016 7:04:37 PM PDT by Partisan Gunslinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies]

To: central_va
BTW, let's get back to your original assertion. You are going to claim that a factory can be built anywhere, right? And that it will be just as competitive as any other, right? And that this supports your assertion that tariffs work differently for agriculture than for manufacturing, right? And that this means that tariffs won't work to depress production the way they have in the past, right? And that if you know the details of an industry or economic policy, you must work in it, right?

I don't need to quote anything else on the stupid front...

182 posted on 03/20/2016 7:04:38 PM PDT by Charles H. (The_r0nin) (Hwaet! Lar bith maest hord, sothlice!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies]

To: central_va
Seems like it popped right back up over the next 5 years to around 50%. BusTED.

1865, 1870. You consider that "recently"?

183 posted on 03/20/2016 7:06:06 PM PDT by Partisan Gunslinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies]

To: Partisan Gunslinger

Honestly, I think we are both wasting our time. Once you get like this person, more interested in winning an argument than in making sense or being factually correct, there’s nothing else to be gained.

The positive thing is that we don’t have to worry about any economic competition from that front. The sad thing is, he probably votes...


184 posted on 03/20/2016 7:08:56 PM PDT by Charles H. (The_r0nin) (Hwaet! Lar bith maest hord, sothlice!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies]

To: Partisan Gunslinger
You are comparing apples to orchards. Not talking about the percentage that tariffs contributed to government revenue especially since the advent of the income taxes makes that comparison meaningless.

The subject at hand is Tariffs placed on imports. Again, up until the 1970's America...from the beginning...had generally high tariffs and that certainly was a factor in America becoming an industrial powerhouse.

Free trade has decimated our manufacturing base and America is a debtor nation in all regards. It's no accident. Bad trade policy is at the root of our economic problems.

185 posted on 03/20/2016 7:11:45 PM PDT by WRhine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies]

To: Charles H. (The_r0nin)
Honestly, I think we are both wasting our time. Once you get like this person, more interested in winning an argument than in making sense or being factually correct, there’s nothing else to be gained. The positive thing is that we don’t have to worry about any economic competition from that front. The sad thing is, he probably votes...

Yeah, on another thread he railed against the evil of profits and capitalism. A lot of these protectionists are anti-American and actually want the destruction of America and it's capitalist ways.

186 posted on 03/20/2016 7:12:53 PM PDT by Partisan Gunslinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies]

To: Charles H. (The_r0nin)

If Poland puts a tariff on sugar cane this will never ever promote the domestic Polish sugar can industry because you can never grow sugar cane in Poland. It just isn’t possible. But you can build all the factories you want in Poland and tariffs work much differently for manufactured goods that they do for agricultural goods. Even a Democrat could see the difference. But somehow you can’t. You must be another delusional Free Traitor™.


187 posted on 03/20/2016 7:13:33 PM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies]

To: Charles H. (The_r0nin)

History is known to repeat itself, so your premise there is spurious, since it would render studying any history pointless. That there is a strong positive correlation between protective tariffs and the industrialization of the US in the late 1800s is considered likely by most historians. That Great Britain, following a practice of free trade, was eclipsed as the leading economic power by the US around 1900, is an indicator that free trade is not an entirely desirable situation. Are they absolutely the cause- not entirely. But that they are part of the picture is undeniable. At present, we have few barriers on trade, and negligible growth in our domestic economy. Logic would indicate a return to a former policy to achieve similar results.


188 posted on 03/20/2016 7:14:07 PM PDT by GenXteacher (You have chosen dishonor to avoid war; you shall have war also.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies]

To: Partisan Gunslinger
Yeah, on another thread he railed against the evil of profits and capitalism.

Post where that happened.

189 posted on 03/20/2016 7:14:39 PM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies]

To: Partisan Gunslinger
Before the 1850s, 95% of the federal budget was paid by tariffs. By 1865, just 25% of the budget was paid by tariffs. By 1945 this dropped to 1% or so at a less than 10% tariff and has stayed there since.

You said by 1865 it was down to 25%. Then you jumped to 1945. You cherry picked the data grabbing the low point to make you disingenuous point. BusTED.

190 posted on 03/20/2016 7:18:07 PM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies]

To: WRhine
You are comparing apples to orchards. Not talking about the percentage that tariffs contributed to government revenue especially since the advent of the income taxes makes that comparison meaningless.

Goofball posted the chart. Can you not see that tariffs have been below 10% since the 1940s? I don't consider the 1940s "recently".

The subject at hand is Tariffs placed on imports. Again, up until the 1970's America...from the beginning...had generally high tariffs and that certainly was a factor in America becoming an industrial powerhouse.

No, tariffs have been below 10% since the 1940s. Like I said, you need to reread your tariff history.

Free trade has decimated our manufacturing base and America is a debtor nation in all regards. It's no accident. Bad trade policy is at the root of our economic problems.

You protectionists act as if the only economic policy passed since the 40s was NAFTA. You ignore two anti-America presidents, Clinton and Obama, trying to destroy business every way they can, the dumbing down of our children in the public schools, the out of control EPA regulations shutting down manufacturing, the high corporate taxes, the movement of millions of people to the welfare and disability roles, the expansion of our debt through a bloated government, the loss of freedom, the land grabs and the high property taxes resulting rom that, high energy costs by government over-involvement in energy, the union-friendly policies of the last 70 years. Fix some of these and we can trade with anyone. Tariffs will only add to our demise forcing even more businesses to offshore to avoid their partners paying higher tariffs.

191 posted on 03/20/2016 7:25:19 PM PDT by Partisan Gunslinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

To: central_va
Post where that happened.

Do you deny it?

192 posted on 03/20/2016 7:26:50 PM PDT by Partisan Gunslinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies]

To: Partisan Gunslinger
Goofball

Coming from a Free Traitor™ I will take that as a compliment.

193 posted on 03/20/2016 7:28:46 PM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 191 | View Replies]

To: central_va
You said by 1865 it was down to 25%. Then you jumped to 1945. You cherry picked the data grabbing the low point to make you disingenuous point. BusTED.

I didn't cherry pick. It jumped around and in 1865 or so it hit 25%. Later it hit less then 25%, then later it hit less than 1%. What's your problem?

194 posted on 03/20/2016 7:29:59 PM PDT by Partisan Gunslinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 190 | View Replies]

To: Ajnin
So we raise tariffs and nothing happens?

Yes we balance the budget, the Treasury stops having to sell T-Bills and we are on our way to a strong dollar, repatriation of industry and clear sailing.

195 posted on 03/20/2016 7:31:38 PM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

To: central_va
Coming from a Free Traitor™ I will take that as a compliment.

You're an anti-capitalist traitor that want the breakup of America. Do you deny that you want states to secede from the union?

196 posted on 03/20/2016 7:32:17 PM PDT by Partisan Gunslinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 193 | View Replies]

To: Partisan Gunslinger
didn't cherry pick. It jumped around and in 1865 or so it hit 25%. Later it hit less then 25%, then later it hit less than 1%. What's your problem?

How convenient that 1865 was the low point for around 100 years. You lie just like Ted does just not as well.

197 posted on 03/20/2016 7:33:20 PM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 194 | View Replies]

To: Partisan Gunslinger
Do you deny that you want states to secede from the union?

As long as my new country doesn't have you in it I am good.

198 posted on 03/20/2016 7:34:32 PM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 196 | View Replies]

To: Partisan Gunslinger
You're an anti-capitalist traitor

Where did you get that?

199 posted on 03/20/2016 7:35:45 PM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 196 | View Replies]

To: Partisan Gunslinger
Do you deny that you want states to secede from the union?

Trump is the last chance to save the USA in its current configuration.

Ultimately the only way to free ourselves from the gloBULList cabal that is hollowing out the American economy, bankrupting us and destroying our opportunity to live as free prosperous adults would be to secede from FedGov™. That's the way I see it anyway.

200 posted on 03/20/2016 7:40:27 PM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 196 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 261-274 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson