Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

19 Facts About The Deindustrialization Of America That Will Make You Weep
Business Insider ^ | 9/27/10 | Michael Snyder

Posted on 03/20/2016 2:57:17 PM PDT by central_va

The United States is rapidly becoming the very first "post-industrial" nation on the globe. All great economic empires eventually become fat and lazy and squander the great wealth that their forefathers have left them, but the pace at which America is accomplishing this is absolutely amazing. It was America that was at the forefront of the industrial revolution.

(Excerpt) Read more at businessinsider.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: deindustrialization; economy; free; globullists; postindustrial; suck; traitors; uscrisis
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 261-274 next last
To: exit82

The problem is that an 8th Grade Education in the 40s was far superior to a college education, today!


161 posted on 03/20/2016 6:27:22 PM PDT by Redleg Duke (Remember...after the primaries, we better still be on the same team!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: zek157
Takes only a couple generations to dumb down a society.

The relentless push of celebrity worship and sports obsession plus the huge distraction of the Internet has, in my opinion, created a populace of completely detached people who think whatever Jon Stewart and Michael Moore tell them to think.

162 posted on 03/20/2016 6:27:32 PM PDT by Lizavetta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: central_va

You are the same person who tried to assert that union labor costs would be comparable across different manufacturing processes. Now you are asserting that conclusions can’t be drawn across different products? Seems that logical consistency is not one of your strong suits. Besides, the effect of a tariff is on the importation of the product, not the manufacture of it. The manufacturing determines the limit to which a business can change its production to try and defeat the tariff... not on the effect of the tariff on the consumers...


163 posted on 03/20/2016 6:28:17 PM PDT by Charles H. (The_r0nin) (Hwaet! Lar bith maest hord, sothlice!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: Charles H. (The_r0nin)

No, I teach history, which shows that we had manufacturing expansion while we had tariffs, particularly in the late 1800s when we had much of our growth in economic terms take place.


164 posted on 03/20/2016 6:31:37 PM PDT by GenXteacher (You have chosen dishonor to avoid war; you shall have war also.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: Charles H. (The_r0nin)
First of all you don't manufacture agricultural products you grow them. Agriculture has restrictions as to climate and is regional by nature. Factories are not. You can build a factory pretty much any where in any the third world, regardless of how backwards the country seems to be. But you are not ever going to grow sugar cane in Poland. See the difference?

Agriculture does create wealth but not as quickly as manufacturing. A country that exports only agricultural goods and imports all of its manufactured goods is going to be perpetually poor, go bankrupt eventually or run a huge deficit.

165 posted on 03/20/2016 6:38:50 PM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: GenXteacher
The problem with history is that it only happens once. You can say that there was a large amount of economic growth during particular points in the 1800s, but you can't say what those results would have been without tariffs, or with higher ones. Deciding that tariffs were the cause of economic growth at the time (rather than an impediment that didn't erase all of the economic gains), despite the fact that the US grew in size, scope, and population dramatically, means that you have reached a conclusion and are now cherry-picking evidence.

With smaller tariffs, would the growth in the 1800s have been smaller or larger? Did they act as wings or as shackles? History can't tell us that. Only economic principles have guesses (and they aren't much better than that) as to the effect of any economic policies. And I haven't heard any economic principles here so far that couldn't be written on a matchbook... in crayon...

166 posted on 03/20/2016 6:39:15 PM PDT by Charles H. (The_r0nin) (Hwaet! Lar bith maest hord, sothlice!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg

Trump, the only candidate talking about $1,000,000,000,000 foreign trade DEFICIT EVERY YEAR, which is main reason middle class jobs have disappeared from the United States. All others are slaves to their ultra rich sugar daddy’s.

For example:

Despite Cruzs attacks on his partys donor class and establishment, the Texas senator Ted Cruz^s GOP campaign has received $37 million from just four donors.

The Wilks family of Cisco, Texas, New York hedge fund tycoon Bob Mercer, Texas energy investor Toby Neugebauer and Illinois manufacturing moguls Dick and Liz Uihlein.

Do you think that money was handed over to Cruz campaign because of his debating skills?


167 posted on 03/20/2016 6:40:06 PM PDT by entropy12 (When you vote, you are actually voting for the candidate's rich donors!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: GenXteacher

Without the War of Independence and trade tariffs North America would have missed the industrialist revolution. Hitler wins WWII and we all speak German.


168 posted on 03/20/2016 6:41:45 PM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: Charles H. (The_r0nin)
With smaller tariffs, would the growth in the 1800s have been smaller or larger?

Brittan would have chocked off industrial development.

169 posted on 03/20/2016 6:44:37 PM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
a tariff ends up simply protecting a domestic industry that is too outdated or lazy to compete on its own.

That's the 1970's American auto and steel industries described to a nicety.

Lazy, incompetent workers, unions and management who produced a crap product at too high a price because there was no competition to keep them on their toes.

Exactly what we would get if we brought back high tariffs.

170 posted on 03/20/2016 6:45:27 PM PDT by Eric Pode of Croydon (President Hillary Clinton will attend Donald Trump's next wedding.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: central_va
You can build a factory pretty much any where in any the third world, regardless of how backwards the country seems to be.

Thank you for providing the evidence that you asked for. You can build a factory anywhere? One without infrastructure? How will you power your third-world factory (I hear windmills are coming back in vogue)? How will you transport the raw materials and finished products without rail, trucks, or ships? How will you produce at a high rate of speed and skill with a population with a backwards culture and work ethic (part of the reason they are "third world" in the first place)? Factories are limited by "climate" as much as agriculture, except the "climate" isn't restricted to the weather.

It is plain that you've never run a business that produces a tangible product. The situational hurdles are as real as poor soil and lack of rain. But hey, don't let any of that interfere with your simplistic worldview...

171 posted on 03/20/2016 6:47:10 PM PDT by Charles H. (The_r0nin) (Hwaet! Lar bith maest hord, sothlice!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies]

To: Eric Pode of Croydon
Exactly what we would get if we brought back high tariffs.

Actually the cars made in the 1960's and early 70s were very desirable and people loved them.

172 posted on 03/20/2016 6:47:15 PM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies]

To: WRhine
You seem at have a problem with history. America always had tariffs of at least 10% to much higher levels throughout our history until recently. It was a critical factor in America becoming the biggest manufacturing and technological powerhouse ever; until the our experiment with free (one-way) corporate sponsored trade deals. Please re-review our tariff history and come back with a argument.

Before the 1850s, 95% of the federal budget was paid by tariffs. By 1865, just 25% of the budget was paid by tariffs. By 1945 this dropped to 1% or so at a less than 10% tariff and has stayed there since.

173 posted on 03/20/2016 6:47:30 PM PDT by Partisan Gunslinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: Charles H. (The_r0nin)

If you can build a factory in Vietnam you can build one anywhere. 30 years ago the Chinese were backwards dung burning rice pickers. Now look what we gave them.


174 posted on 03/20/2016 6:49:17 PM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]

To: Partisan Gunslinger
U.S. Historical Tariffs (Customs) Collections by Federal Government
(All dollar amounts are in millions of U.S. dollars)[1][2][3][4][5][6]

Year Tariff
Income
Budget
% Tariff
Federal
Receipts
Income
Tax
Payroll
Tax
Average
Tariff
1792 $4.4 95.0% $4.6 $- $- 15.1%
1795 $5.6 91.6% $6.1 $- $- 8.0%
1800 $9.1 83.7% $10.8 $- $- 10.0%
1805 $12.9 95.4% $13.6 $- $- 10.7%
1810 $8.6 91.5% $9.4 $- $- 10.1%
1815 $7.3 46.4% $15.7 $- $- 6.5%
1820 $15.0 83.9% $17.9 $- $- 20.2%
1825 $20.1 97.9% $20.5 $- $- 22.3%
1830 $21.9 88.2% $24.8 $- $- 35.0%
1835 $19.4 54.1% $35.8 $- $- 14.2%
1840 $12.5 64.2% $19.5 $- $- 12.7%
1845 $27.5 91.9% $30.0 $- $- 24.3%
1850 $39.7 91.0% $43.6 $- $- 22.9%
1855 $53.0 81.2% $65.4 $- $- 20.6%
1860 $53.2 94.9% $56.1 $- $- 15.0%
1863 $63.0 55.9% $112.7 $- $- 25.9%
1864 $102.3 38.7% $264.6 $- $- 32.3%
1865 $84.9 25.4% $333.7 $61.0 $- 35.6%
1870 $194.5 47.3% $411.3 $37.8 $- 44.6%
1875 $157.2 54.6% $288.0 $- $- 36.1%
1880 $184.5 55.3% $333.5 $- $- 27.6%
1885 $181.5 56.1% $323.7 $- $- 32.6%
1890 $229.7 57.0% $403.1 $- $- 27.6%
1900 $233.2 41.1% $567.2 $- $- 27.4%
1910 $233.7 34.6% $675.2 $- $- 15.0%
1913 $318.8 44.0% $724.1 $35.0 $- 17.6%
1915 $209.8 30.1% $697.9 $47.0 $- 12.5%
1916 $213.7 27.3% $782.5 $121.0 $- 8.9%
1917 $225.9 20.1% $1,124.3 $373.0 $- 7.7%
1918 $947.0 25.8% $3,664.6 $2,720.0 $- 31.2%
1920 $886.0 13.2% $6,694.6 $4,032.0 $- 16.8%
1925 $547.6 14.5% $3,780.1 $1,697.0 $- 13.0%
1928 $566.0 14.0% $4,042.3 $2,088.0 $- 13.8%
1930 $587.0 14.1% $4,177.9 $2,300.0 $- 19.2%
1935 $318.8 8.4% $3,800.5 $1,100.0 $- 15.6%
1940 $331.0 6.1% $5,387.1 $2,100.0 $800.0 12.6%
1942 $369.0 2.9% $12,799.1 $7,900.0 $1,200.0 13.4%
1944 $417.0 0.9% $44,148.9 $34,400.0 $1,900.0 10.6%
1946 $424.0 0.9% $46,400.0 $28,000.0 $1,900.0 7.7%
1948 $408.0 0.9% $47,300.0 $29,000.0 $2,500.0 5.5%
1950 $407.0 0.9% $43,800.0 $26,200.0 $3,000.0 4.5%
1951 $609.0 1.1% $56,700.0 $35,700.0 $4,100.0 5.5%
1955 $585.0 0.8% $71,900.0 $46,400.0 $6,100.0 5.1%
1960 $1,105.0 1.1% $99,800.0 $62,200.0 $12,200.0 7.3%
1965 $1,442.0 1.2% $116,800.0 $74,300.0 $22,200.0 6.7%
1970 $2,430.0 1.3% $192,800.0 $123,200.0 $44,400.0 6.0%
1975 $3,676.0 1.3% $279,100.0 $163,000.0 $84,500.0 3.7%
1980 $7,174.0 1.4% $517,100.0 $308,700.0 $157,800.0 2.9%
1985 $12,079.0 1.6% $734,000.0 $395,900.0 $255,200.0 3.6%
1990 $11,500.0 1.1% $1,032,000.0 $560,400.0 $380,000.0 2.8%
1995 $19,301.0 1.4% $1,361,000.0 $747,200.0 $484,500.0 2.6%
2000 $19,914.0 1.0% $2,025,200.0 $1,211,700.0 $652,900.0 1.6%
2005 $23,379.0 1.1% $2,153,600.0 $1,205,500.0 $794,100.0 1.4%
2010 $25,298.0 1.2% $2,162,700.0 $1,090,000.0 $864,800.0 1.3%
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notes:
All dollar amounts are in millions of U.S. dollars
Income taxes include Individual and Corporate taxes
Federal expenditures often exceed Revenue by temporary borrowings.
Initially the U.S. Federal Government was financed mainly by customs(tariffs
Average Tariff Rate % = Customs Revenue/ cost of Imports (goods).
Other taxes collected are: Income Tax, Corporate Income Tax, Inheritance,
Tariffs—often called Customs or duties on imports, etc.
Income Taxes began in 1913 with the passage of 16th Amendment.
Payroll taxes are Social Security and Medicare taxes
Payroll Taxes began in 1940.
Many Federal government Excise taxes are assigned to Trust Funds
and are collected for and “dedicated” to a particular Trust.
Sources:
  • Historical Statistics of the United States 1789-1945[7]
  • Bicentennial Edition Historical Statistics of the United States Series 1790-1970[8]
  • U.S. Census Trade Statistics[9]
  • Whitehouse Historical Tables 1940-2016[10]

175 posted on 03/20/2016 6:51:29 PM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies]

To: central_va
If you can build a factory in Vietnam you can build one anywhere. 30 years ago the Chinese were backwards dung burning rice pickers. Now look what we gave them.

Then your fame and fortune awaits! All you need to do is start building factories in sub-Saharan Africa. Might I suggest Zimbabwe as a particularly nice spot (uncontaminated by anything so handicapping as an industrial base to compete with you). What are you waiting for?

176 posted on 03/20/2016 6:54:42 PM PDT by Charles H. (The_r0nin) (Hwaet! Lar bith maest hord, sothlice!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies]

To: Partisan Gunslinger
By 1865, just 25%

Seems like it popped right back up over the next 5 years to around 50%. BusTED.

177 posted on 03/20/2016 6:55:09 PM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies]

To: Charles H. (The_r0nin)

There are aspirin factories in the Sudan that Clinton tomahawked. Remember that?


178 posted on 03/20/2016 6:56:09 PM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]

To: central_va
So you are promoting an Al-Qaida-connected nerve gas factory as your poster child? Try building cars there (since that seems to be your ideal product as per above).

Allow me to give you a bit of advice. Beware the First Law of Holes: "Once you are in one, stop digging..."

179 posted on 03/20/2016 6:59:54 PM PDT by Charles H. (The_r0nin) (Hwaet! Lar bith maest hord, sothlice!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies]

To: Charles H. (The_r0nin)

Vietnam and China were as backward as them come 30 years ago. Explain that? China 30-40 years ago was North Korea just on a huge scale.


180 posted on 03/20/2016 7:01:31 PM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 261-274 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson