[Partisan Gunslinger]

You said by 1865 it was down to 25%. Then you jumped to 1945. You cherry picked the data grabbing the low point to make you disingenuous point. BusTED.

I didn't cherry pick. It jumped around and in 1865 or so it hit 25%. Later it hit less then 25%, then later it hit less than 1%. What's your problem?

[central_va]

didn't cherry pick. It jumped around and in 1865 or so it hit 25%. Later it hit less then 25%, then later it hit less than 1%. What's your problem?

How convenient that 1865 was the low point for around 100 years. You lie just like Ted does just not as well.