Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Donald Trump comes out against letting states manage federal lands?
Twitchy ^ | Posted at 11:02 pm on January 22, 2016 | Twitchy Staff

Posted on 01/23/2016 6:43:01 AM PST by Oklahoma

Some news to report out of Las Vegas where Donald Trump sat down with Field & Stream magazine for an interview during the National Shooting Sports Foundation’s annual SHOT Show.

First up, the GOP front-runner came out against letting states control public lands now run by the federal government saying, “I don’t like the idea because I want to keep the lands great, and you don’t know what the state is going to do."

(Excerpt) Read more at twitchy.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Government; Politics/Elections; US: Nevada; US: New York
KEYWORDS: 2016election; 2ndamendment; banglist; cnsrvtvtreehouse; dsj02; election2016; erickerickson; federalcontrol; fieldandstream; glennbeck; guncontrol; lasvegas; marklevin; megynkelly; natlshootingsports; nevada; newyork; pinkstain; pinkstate; politico; redstate; redstategathering; rogerailes; secondamendment; statesrights; sundance; trump; twitchy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 241-251 next last
He'll be asking the Sierra Club for an endorsement next.
1 posted on 01/23/2016 6:43:01 AM PST by Oklahoma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Oklahoma

That’s OK. I bet they’ve already asked him for money.


2 posted on 01/23/2016 6:46:58 AM PST by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oklahoma

Because the feds do such a fine job of managing the land. /s


3 posted on 01/23/2016 6:47:47 AM PST by cripplecreek (Pride goes before destruction, and a haughty spirit before a fall.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oklahoma

Yep, can’t trust those states to take of their own property.
As my stomach churns.


4 posted on 01/23/2016 6:50:45 AM PST by lucky american (Progressives are attacking our rights and y'all will sit there and take it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oklahoma

He’s a knee jerk liberal. He has to work hard at pretending to be a conservative. But this election is about emotions. He’s THE ONE.


5 posted on 01/23/2016 6:51:38 AM PST by P-Marlowe (Freepers. The enemy is on the left, not the right!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

how about getting rid of all federal land except military bases? Could pay down some of the debt!


6 posted on 01/23/2016 6:51:42 AM PST by jonose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Oklahoma

Sorry Conservatives. L love ye but...


7 posted on 01/23/2016 6:52:05 AM PST by Norm Lenhart (Existential Cage Theory - An idea whose time has come)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oklahoma

Tag line.


8 posted on 01/23/2016 6:52:40 AM PST by BobL (Who cares? He's going to build a wall and stop this invasion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oklahoma
I want to keep the lands great, and you don't know what the state is going to do."

Anyone here think state governments are less corrupt and more efficient than the federal government? Annapolis, DC, Sacramento, Austin - I repeat - Austin?

Our Natianal Parks are a great heritage. BLM lands - well, there is some room for negotiation.

9 posted on 01/23/2016 6:53:22 AM PST by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

Immigration and Political correctness are his issues. Just look at the pushback over the lack of black oscar nominees. Trump doesn’t have anything to do with it?


10 posted on 01/23/2016 6:54:37 AM PST by DIRTYSECRET (urope. Why do they put up with this.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: AndyJackson

I didn’t realize there was a Conservative rational for big federal government control of all those lands. As a general rule private is better than government ownership and state ownership better than federal ownership.


11 posted on 01/23/2016 6:56:40 AM PST by Oklahoma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: lucky american

If he were to choose Cruz as vp, I would worry less about him straying due to simple ignorance.

He’ll figure it out. But it still worries me that he has this tendency.

Picking Cruz as vp early also makes them a team. As such, the establishment would have to defeat them as a team instead of one by one.


12 posted on 01/23/2016 6:57:06 AM PST by Principled (...the Supreme Court of the United States favors some laws over others...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe

Okay, if not Trump who you got?

I like Cruz but he has very little chance. He just doesn’t have the personality. Yeah, I said it. I could tolerate his personality but that’s not the average American. The average American is stupid and will not put him in office.

After Cruz, who you have? Carson? He’s a nutcase on so many issues. Rubio? Mr. Amnesty?

If not Trump, who that can WIN?


13 posted on 01/23/2016 6:57:36 AM PST by boycott (--)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: AndyJackson

Are you a conservative?


14 posted on 01/23/2016 6:57:55 AM PST by vbmoneyspender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Oklahoma

Would it be ok if Sarah Palin was secretary of interior?


15 posted on 01/23/2016 6:59:45 AM PST by pangaea6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oklahoma

I don’t think his supporters can hear you. They’re too busy herding Levin, Limbaugh, Sowell, Bozell and co. into the RINO/GOPe bus.


16 posted on 01/23/2016 7:00:10 AM PST by Nickname
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe

Yeah, sure, if you say so.

And all past presidents were liberals also because none of them turned over the federal lands to the states.


17 posted on 01/23/2016 7:01:20 AM PST by Helicondelta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Oklahoma

Wrong answer McFry.

Trump needs to really understand the depths of unconstitutionality the feds have plumbed including unconstitutionally commandeering state lands outside of the guidelines of Article I, Section 8, Clause 17.

Those lands constitutionally BELONG to the states NOT to the feds.

Mr. Trump, America’s greatness is in the AMERICAN PEOPLE and their freedom to govern themselves individually and locally which includes state governance. America’s greatness is NOT in the unconstitutional federal government which is expressly limited by the Constitution.


18 posted on 01/23/2016 7:02:14 AM PST by Jim W N
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oklahoma

Not much different than Reagan:

http://www.weeklystandard.com/reagan-the-environmentalist/article/733961

“A classic example of Reagan’s approach can be found in the Coastal Barrier Resources Act, which the president signed in 1982. The law established the Coastal Barrier Resources System (CBRS), a zone that today encompasses 273 million acres of land (an area larger than all but one national park in the lower 48 states) in which federal subsidies to new development​—​notably, subsidies for roads, housing, and flood insurance​—​are forbidden. Private interests may still develop the land but must do so without a penny of federal money. It is estimated the law has saved taxpayers

$1 billion since its enactment.”

For some reason Regan didn’t turn over the Nat. parks to the states. Why, I dont know. So this isn’t a simple case of Do A = Real conservative, do B = Not.

I can only assume we have a similar interview for Cruz available from this publication?


19 posted on 01/23/2016 7:04:02 AM PST by VanDeKoik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oklahoma

Trump is not running for king or dictator. Any divestiture of federal land would have to be driven by the Congress. This posting is irrelevant and intended to incite. It’s just more anti Trump garbage.


20 posted on 01/23/2016 7:05:36 AM PST by DrPretorius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 241-251 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson