Clarice Feldman: Do Hillary's Lies Matter?

American Thinker ^ | October 25, 2015 | Clarice Feldman

[jazusamo]

It is of little concern to me that the corporate media says Hillary aced the Benghazi hearing, To me she didn’t, and I care more that the public is being inured to public officials’ lying. Were I running for president against her I’d produce a simple campaign video.

My campaign video would be short -- it would be Hillary before the caskets of the four Americans slaughtered in Benghazi blaming an obscure video and its maker for the incident; Hillary telling the father of one of the deceased, Ty Woods, that the video maker would be arrested (“we are going to have the film maker arrested who was responsible for the death of your son"), and her testimony before the committee that she never blamed it on the video. The ad would take just a couple of minutes. . Message at end -- are you ready for a president who lies over the bodies of dead American patriots?

Maybe I’ve misjudged the voters. Maybe they really would like a brazen, self-seeking consummate liar. Because that’s what she certainly is.

She dissembled so often in the hearings I cannot possibly keep you awake while detailing them all. Let me pick just a few of her more outrageous lies -- the video and her correspondence with Sidney Blumenthal.

Hillary’s Cock and Bull Story About the Video.

Sept. 11, 2012: U.S. Embassy in Cairo.

U.S. Embassy Condemns Religious Incitement

The Embassy of the United States in Cairo condemns the continuing efforts by misguided individuals to hurt the religious feelings of Muslims -- as we condemn efforts to offend believers of all religions. Today, the 11th anniversary of the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks on the United States, Americans are honoring our patriots and those who serve our nation as the fitting response...

[Lisbon1940]

Hannity badgered McCarthy into making his damaging statement. Now he wants to double down on the politicizing. Guaranteed backfire.

[MUDDOG]

Ha! I didn’t know Hannity’s fingerprints were on that.

[Yaelle]

I believe even the liberal voters would wake up if they understood that.

If Hillary is their nominee, they lose with that 30 second ad.

And if the lib voters choose to vote for her over Trump anyway, we are in such a seriously bad state that elections are the least of our problems.

[jazusamo]

She was sickening in that hearing.

Arrogant, self serving and made it very clear it was beneath her to even be sitting there.

If, God forbid, she ends up in the WH she’ll only be worse.

[joshua c]

Does the video maker, a political prisoner, have a case against the Federal government(Obama, Holder) for false imprisonment?

[jazusamo]

I don’t know the legalities but would hope so, last I heard we still have a First Amendment though Bambam has done his best to ignore it.

[blueunicorn6]

“All relationships, personal and professional, are built on trust.”

Are there Democrat partisans in the FBI?

Of course.

How would they view Lois Lerner’s actions?

“Awwww....it was just politics and she’s with my side.”

How would they view Hillary’s actions?

“No Republicans involved. A big Democrat got killed. Some guys just like us got killed. This isn’t political. This is criminal. It doesn’t benefit my side.

If they are willing to let those guys die, then would they really care about me and the other Democrats?”

The Democrats can’t trust Hillary and Obama.

[VRWC For Truth]

The Commie biotch will get hers. She’s dancin like a cornered ‘Rat.

[jazusamo]

The Democrats can’t trust Hillary and Obama.

Right on...Neither of them care about anyone but themselves.

[Bullish]

Huck Fillary

[smoothsailing]

Looking on the bright side, PIAPS was exposed during the hearing as a pathological liar. There’s just no getting around that.

With the exception of Trump and maybe Cruz, I wouldn’t expect the various Republican campaigns to spend money on Benghazi ads.

But the PACS are another story. I expect them to be hardhitting and slickly produced. And hopefully vicious in their exposure of the diabolical nature of the Hilabeast.

[jazusamo]

And hopefully vicious in their exposure of the diabolical nature of the Hilabeast.

Amen...The PACS can rip her to shreds on this issue and I'd bet they will, she more than deserves to be eviscerated over it.

I agree on Trump and Cruz probably being the only two to use it, a couple of the others may even think her performance was no big deal.

[FreedBird]

Maybe the Hillary machine threatened Biden to get out the day before or she would spill the peas about his involvement in the lies and video. They sure didn’t protect Stevens. Wonder why??

[poconopundit]

In these sentiments, Sir, I agree to this Constitution, with all its faults, — if they are such; because I think a general Government necessary for us, and there is no form of government but what may be a blessing to the people, if well administered; and I believe, farther, that this is likely to be well administered for a course of years, and can only end in despotism, as other forms have done before it, when the people shall become so corrupted as to need despotic government, being incapable of any other. Speech to the Constitutional Convention (September 17, 1787); reported in James Madison, Journal of the Federal Convention, ed. E. H. Scott (1893), p. 742

Benjamin Franklin, Wikiquotes

[FreedBird]

A new Benghazi movie is coming out in January. This issue is not going to go away. Stevens sent 600 e-mails requesting help. Why didn’t Stevens get help?? Hillary ignored his e-mails. Is lying Presidential? The MSM thinks lying is Presidential. The MSM destroys its credibility when they endorse a serial liar.

[jazusamo]

Yep, Hillary said Stevens never contacted her about security and anyone with half a brain knows that’s a lie, especially the enemedia but they’re in the tank for her.

Catherine Herridge at FNC is not in the tank for Hillary and her stories coming up are going to be most interesting because she’s not afraid to point out the liar Hillary is.

Hillary has never in her life even approached being Presidential or a decent person and never will.

[CyberAnt]

Well, any “gentleman” who does not include ads of Hillary’s Benghazi testimony .. is not only NOT a gentleman, he’s not fit to be President.

Why ..?? Because in order to run a country, you should be a leader of the law abiding .. not a leader of the lawless. If you support lawlessness; you will have a country of ONLY THE LAWLESS .. that’s not a good plan.

[Bon mots]

[garjog]

Remember. Lying is a resume enhancer for Democrats.

[cpdiii]

Huck Fillary?

Not me my friend not me!
WJC