Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hillary Clinton Says She Did Not Send or Receive Emails With Material ‘Marked’ Classified
Cybercast News Service ^ | August 15, 2015 | 6:26 PM EDT | Terence P. Jeffrey

Posted on 08/15/2015 4:08:32 PM PDT by Olog-hai

At the Iowa State Fair today, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said that she did not send or receive emails that including material that was “marked” classified.

The former secretary of state did not say there was no classified material in the emails she had retained on her private email server. […]

On July 24, Intelligence Community Inspector General Charles McCullough and State Department Inspector General Steve Linick issued a joint statement stating that four emails out of a limited sampling of 40—of the 30,000 that Clinton turned over to the State Department—included classified information. …

(Excerpt) Read more at cnsnews.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; Government; US: Arkansas; US: Iowa; US: New York; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 2016election; arkansas; charlesmccullough; classified; election2016; emailserver; hillary; hillaryclinton; hitlery; iowa; newyork; rop; stevelinick; whatdifdoesitmake
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-96 next last
To: Olog-hai

A question every “journalist” should ask when reporting on the Hillary scandal...

Richard Grenell: If Hillary Clinton never sent or received diplomatic policy details, what was she doing?

http://twitchy.com/2015/08/15/richard-grenell-if-hillary-clinton-never-sent-or-received-diplomatic-policy-details-what-was-she-doing/


61 posted on 08/15/2015 5:31:57 PM PDT by Hotlanta Mike ('You can avoid reality, but you canÂ’t avoid the consequences of avoiding reality.Â’)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: inpajamas

As SOS, there is no that she could NOT have known. I mean, is she saying she is too stupid to know what material is what? So this is what she is running on now:
“Hi, I’m Hillary and I’m too stupid to do the job as president, elect me!”


62 posted on 08/15/2015 5:37:01 PM PDT by realcleanguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

But they should have been, right?


63 posted on 08/15/2015 5:38:47 PM PDT by jsanders2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: elpadre

She is trying to trick people. If an ally of hers stripped the classifications, she is telling the (half-) truth.


64 posted on 08/15/2015 5:39:07 PM PDT by PghBaldy (12/14 - 930am -rampage begins... 12/15 - 1030am - Obama's advance team scouts photo-op locations.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
Hillary Clinton Says She Did Not Send or Receive Emails With Material ‘Marked’ Classified

Just another "Felony" Clinton escape hatch.

The Clintons were weaned on "escape hatches" built into their public utterances.

"It depends upon what the meaning of 'is' is"

65 posted on 08/15/2015 5:39:12 PM PDT by kiryandil (Egging the battleship USS Sarah Palin from their little Progressive rowboats...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
Her emails apparently contained sensitive information - from her, to her, between people she emailed. It does not need to be marked TOP SECRET if the information is inherently secret. She should have known better, didn't care, or was so arrogant that she felt she was immune to any criticism much less subject to any rule or law.

If Huma sent Hillary a picture of her genitals, or vice-versa, but either one failed to mark is PORNOGRAPHY, it still makes it pornography by any definition.

Once again, the Clintons are above the law, above reproach, and immune from any guidelines or practical use of any judgment.

66 posted on 08/15/2015 5:39:18 PM PDT by SERKIT ("Blazing Saddles" explains it all.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pepsi_junkie

She is concerned about a perjury charge, which is why she keeps using that precise wording. She knows Obama will not prosecute, but perjury is something he cannot protect her from


67 posted on 08/15/2015 5:39:26 PM PDT by Melinator (my 2 cents)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: CommerceComet

I have had a little experience handling ‘code word’ messages in the DOD environment. Mrs. Clinton’s story doesn’t pass the smell test. Intelligence at that level just doesn’t exist unless someone deliberately goes around the safeguards. Even at lower levels (i.e., SECRET & CONFIDENTIAL) you cannot copy text digitally onto media. If you print highly classified Intel it’s dissemination is tightly controller and can only be read in designated areas/spaces. SI & TK labelled materials can normally be viewed in such spaces. Even digitally it exists only on terminals that are only connected to networks that are strongly encrypted. To get such Intel into a commercial network would require deliberate action by someone that would intentionally circumvent safeguards. Such action is analogous to what Bradley Manning is going to spend a significant part of his life serving time for. If not Hillery, then someone in her confidence has committed a major felony.


68 posted on 08/15/2015 5:39:54 PM PDT by RedEyeJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Sorry Hillary, if you had child porn on your computer, it would not matter if it was labelled as child porn.


69 posted on 08/15/2015 5:48:48 PM PDT by justa-hairyape (The use of the name is sarcastic. Although at times it may not appear that way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

I would guess that she has received and sent thousands of messages marked classified, top secret, etc.

She is just lying and wording it to make the lie sound a little more plausible.


70 posted on 08/15/2015 5:54:16 PM PDT by yarddog (Romans 8:38-39, For I am persuaded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bryan24

BUT she couldn’t have sold state secrets to the MB on a government monitored email system. She would have gotten busted and it would have made her boss mad. That’s his job.../s


71 posted on 08/15/2015 5:55:50 PM PDT by jsanders2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Covenantor
How could anyone conduct affairs of state without reading and transmitting classified documents?

Bingo.

72 posted on 08/15/2015 6:13:19 PM PDT by Rightwing Conspiratr1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Liar


73 posted on 08/15/2015 6:15:07 PM PDT by b4its2late (A Liberal is a person who will give away everything he doesn't own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservatism_IS_compassion
Maybe no "Serious" voter will vote for her, but how do you think Obummer got elected. They prey on all those "Black Lives Matter" and other idiots. God know there are a lot of them. and don't forget all the illegals they are letting in and challenging state laws to let them vote.
74 posted on 08/15/2015 6:20:28 PM PDT by Bobby_Taxpayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: ScottinVA
.......she knows who’s bought and will have her back.

The missing 6 Billion from State Department funds will buy her a lot of protection............

75 posted on 08/15/2015 6:20:56 PM PDT by varon (America for Americans first!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

76 posted on 08/15/2015 6:27:22 PM PDT by Road Warrior ‘04 (Molon Labe! (Oathkeeper))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

forgetting all the nose of her claims of innocence isn’t it almost beyond belief that she had this server in the first place? I know she has one of the biggest sense of entitlements around and she’s arrogant and all that, but still. How did she think this would play out? Ignore everything else and think how Stupid the decision was. Yes i capitalized Stupid. What the heck was her thought process? I can break the law and then run for president? Excuse me but even recognizing her sense of self importance i still can’t grasp how she could be so Stupid.


77 posted on 08/15/2015 6:29:01 PM PDT by wiggen (#JeSuisCharlie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
Hillary, like Bill, very deliberately remains ignorant of the mechanics of how various things actually work in order to be able to keep a straight face when telling absurd lies. She has a piece of paper somewhere that shows she was told that everything was A-Ok with her setup and that nothing would be handled any differently than if it were on the State Department servers.

Of course, having her own server was solely to avoid having to stick to State Department rules, but that's beside the point. She'll play the "my butt is covered with paper" game once all the other tactics fail and they will fail.

Sooner or later, it's going to boil down to whether or not Congress has the willpower to indict, try, and convict Wench Hillary. Given the fact that it's an election year, it could well happen, too. Not because of Republicans, but because of the wily people behind the Obama throne who want Warren, not Hillary, on the democrat ticket in fall of 2016.

JMHo

78 posted on 08/15/2015 6:32:19 PM PDT by Rashputin (Jesus Christ doesn't evacuate His troops, He leads them to victory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
Hillary Clinton Says She Did Not Send or Receive Emails With Material ‘Marked’ Classified

If she is too stupid to know when a message is "classified" without being marked in big red letters, she is too stupid for the position she held.

What's next?
Making sure none of them are in cursive?

79 posted on 08/15/2015 6:55:34 PM PDT by publius911 (If you like Obamacare, You'll LOVE ObamaWeb.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Notice that she doesn’t deny sending or receiving classified emails. He just denies sending and receiving emails MARKED CLASSIFIED.


80 posted on 08/15/2015 6:57:05 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (There's a right to gay marriage in the Constitution but there is no right of an unborn baby to life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-96 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson