Posted on 01/10/2012 6:19:15 PM PST by Rome2000
New Hampshire and the NE can go get blanked
“the crap they spew”
I agree with you about satire; I like satire, assuming it really is satire. But generalities like “the crap they spew” is kinda indefinite and therefore hard to answer. What part of what the Paultards say is “crap”? Please be specific so that you can get a specific answer. (Do you remember Rick Perry’s answer to one of his press questioners who quoted “a senior official in the Perry organization”? Perry said, “Name names and then we’ll talk; I’m not going to answer a general charge like that.”
This is the same issue: Name a specific statement that you consider “crap,” and then we can talk.)
“As for our tenure here on FR, exactly what does that have to do with the discussion at hand?”
I don’t know. You brought up the subject when you told me my time on this forum was limited. I was just trying to figure out what you meant!
Am I a Paultard? I don’t know that either. What is a “Paultard”? A specific definition will get you a specific answer.
Here’s a question for you: On your website you lament how conservatives are going after each other. If Ron Paul turns out to win the nomination (grant me the “if”), will you support him?
Everybody wants to know whether Ron Paul will support the Republican nominee, or try a third-party run. But nobody ever raises the question whether the other nominees will support Ron Paul if he wins the nomination. Funny how that works: it’s a disaster for conservatives to tear down one another, except it’s OK to tear down Ron Paul, the conservative we don’t like.
Yup and that was a horrible vote by Paul, to this day I do not understand that vote. For a long time he supported DADT and he supported laws against sodomy. So I know understand his vote to repeal DADT. That vote will come back to haunt him.
Yan I couldn’t have said it any better, which was my point exactly, their comments were past being over the top.
basically yes, if a state wants an immoral, bebased and perverted citizenry there is nothing in our constitution that says it can not do just that. That however does not imply Paul would approve of behavioral practices of the debased citizens of the mythical state. The Constitution protects rights it does not regulate behavior, that is for us to do.
Do you support Ron Paul? (Yes/No)
Here’s a question for you: On your website you lament how conservatives are going after each other. If Ron Paul turns out to win the nomination (grant me the “if”), will you support him?
I don't view Ron Paul as a Conservative. I view Ron Paul as an extreme left-wing social Libertarian who tries to paint himself with a fiscally Conservative profile to hide his true views on race, (as published in the newsletter that he acknowledged was his and bore his name) and Israel, who he refuses to acknowledge would be wiped off the map should Iran ever get nuclear capabilities. Those are just TWO examples.
So to directly answer your question of "will you support Ron Paul" if he wins the nomination: HELL NO.
Ron Paul's overly-simplistic world view that the rest of the world will "like us" if only we pulled our military back mirrors that of Barack Hussein Obama, and is just as dangerous as Obama's. That world view is precisely why Islam and evil is on the rise around the world. There's just no way in hell I could ever vote for a Presidential Candidate who espouses such a vew, period.
what is it with you>
Here a simple 3 sec search
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5SZKLvEOp9c
I and another poster gave you the wording and links
no it is not a lie it seems you are unable to grasp the simple basics of a man who you want to defend and I told you is it any wonder why people think he is a kook and now you seem unable to grasp the basics.
Copping out at state level , well will he get rid of laws in the military as he does not want Govt telling people where, who and what they can have sex with?
I tried to talk to you
here as well
this is the nut you support
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2dECSYm5bSM&feature=related
this took another 5 secs , next time you need to to do your research especially when you come on a conservative website and defend him and then you don’;t want to be tied in to the other kooks which support him.
And this is why I generally avoid you and the other harpies. It was a mistake for me to ever post on this thread. I said I was leaving and I did. But the next time I check FR I have a half dozen pings from people gleefully trying to bait me and get me banned.
I don’t support beastiality, homosexuality, abortion, Romney or Paul. I also don’t support nasty, vicious people making false accusations while claiming to be defending Christian ethics.
Ron Paul is not a conservative. He’s a libertarian/anarchist.
You should probably read my posts.
I never said a word about bestiality other than to sarcastically say that it’s probably down the list on Paul’s priorities.
I ignored most of the references because it’s a non-issue just as the contraception questions in last week’s debate were non issues.
Yes, bestiality, incest, adult/child sexual relationships are wrong. In fact, there are laws against them in most if not all places.
However, these are non-issues in this campaign.
This campaign, if you hadn’t noticed, is about the future of this country as it relates to the economy, liberty and the tenants of the Constitution.
My vote will go to whomever is the Republican nominee, period.
My preference is for it to be the most conservative.
PS- I’m not going to apologize nor do I care how I’m characterized for agreeing with Paul on taxes, the size of government, the Fed, or personal liberty.
I watch that the first time I googled other then the title nothing supports his wanting to disband the CIA. Kinda like the title of this thread, other then the title nothing supports Paul being crazy. See how that works?
beginning to think you are incapable or understanding anything , still I tried.
You cannot google, , spell, know what you are defending etc.
Yup and that was a horrible vote by Paul, to this day I do not understand that vote. For a long time he supported DADT and he supported laws against sodomy. So I know understand his vote to repeal DADT. That vote will come back to haunt him.
basically yes, if a state wants an immoral, bebased and perverted citizenry there is nothing in our constitution that says it can not do just that. That however does not imply Paul would approve of behavioral practices of the debased citizens of the mythical state. The Constitution protects rights it does not regulate behavior, that is for us to do.
The article I read about Paul's vote to force homosexuals in the military had direct quotes wherein he stated that "gays" have "Rights" and they cause less trouble in the military than "heterosexuals" and he also stated that they should be able to marry. So he obviously supports "degraded behavioral practices of debased citizens". And states USED to be able to have laws against sodomy, underage sex, bestiality and so on. The Libertarian Party platform is pro-porn (no holds barred), pro-legalized prostitution, pro-homosexual anything and everything, and pro-legalization of all drugs.
The official LP site never says anything about states being allowed to limit or prohibit these vices. RPaul is a libertarian. What he says for public consumption and what he says while not on the campaign trail are not the same thing. You are either wilfully blind or lying. You claimed that Race Bannon's links were "lies". Which parts were lies? Please be specific. You're supporting Paul, so you should be able to show where on those links lies about Paul were told. I can post the links all together to help you out if you want.
However, these are non-issues in this campaign.
In your view along with me being a sicko because I think having sex with animals in front of kids is more sickening than running into debt but you seem to think running into debt makes you a sicko more so than having sex with an animal in front of kids.
Speaks volumes .
The Socialist Romney is NOT the solution. He brought Socialized Health Care to Massachusetts, and THAT is what the Republican Party puts up against an easily deflatable Obama.
Make no mistake that Romney is McCain II and will lose to Obama because he is a Socialist. You are not going to get a conservative to vote for a Socialist.
The bigger issue here is not Ron Paul or Romney. It's the Republican Party. It's no longer a party of limited government. They are not a real opposition party. Yes there are some good conservative Republicans.... However, I'm talking about the direction the party has taken in the last 20 years. The sooner people realize this the sooner things will change. Until then... it's just a dog and pony show.
HUH what are you on about , maybe you wanted to post this to someone else?
Who said debt is not a problem?
Not me.
Who said anything about Romney ?
Not me
I will agree with you however that the GOP is the problem and should have had closed primaries and made libertarians run on their own ticket and let them vote in their own primary and Paul is not a republican.
I will refrain from responding to your arrogant, ignorant, uninformed, pompous post with the first two words that popped into my head.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Actually you caught me on a good day. I’m in a good mood. I thought my post was nice and rather restrained.
Just watch me go when I’m pissed off and upset. Hoo-Wee! That’s when I really let it all out and push the boundaries of decorum.
But that’s not the case now. Now I am having a good day as you wished.
And BTW. Please don’t wonder about my heart and the New Testament. I can assure you I have been born again and am walking daily with the Lord as my Saviour.
Maybe someday we can meet up on a Religion thread and share our faith, mmm-kay?
Go with your instincts...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.