[wilco200]

You should probably read my posts.

I never said a word about bestiality other than to sarcastically say that it’s probably down the list on Paul’s priorities.

I ignored most of the references because it’s a non-issue just as the contraception questions in last week’s debate were non issues.

Yes, bestiality, incest, adult/child sexual relationships are wrong. In fact, there are laws against them in most if not all places.

However, these are non-issues in this campaign.

This campaign, if you hadn’t noticed, is about the future of this country as it relates to the economy, liberty and the tenants of the Constitution.

My vote will go to whomever is the Republican nominee, period.
My preference is for it to be the most conservative.

PS- I’m not going to apologize nor do I care how I’m characterized for agreeing with Paul on taxes, the size of government, the Fed, or personal liberty.

[Responsibility2nd]

Welcome back to the tread.

 

You sure did create a firestorm with your sicko remark. Lots of FReepers understood this was an attack on manc's opposition to child molestation, bestiality, and other deviant lifestyles.

 

I'm glad to see you acknowledging these are bad things.

[manc]

However, these are non-issues in this campaign.

---

In your view along with me being a sicko because I think having sex with animals in front of kids is more sickening than running into debt but you seem to think running into debt makes you a sicko more so than having sex with an animal in front of kids.

Speaks volumes .