Purpose of FR and why we can never support Mitt Romney

vanity | Oct 15, 2011 | Jim Robinson

[Jim Robinson]

Our purpose and goal on FR is to restore, defend, preserve and protect the Constitution of the United States and to secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our posterity!!

The goal of the domestic enemy (the left), i.e., the statist liberals, Marxists and progressives is just the opposite.

The goal of the establishment RINO is to gain control of political power, but not to otherwise rock the boat. The boat continues taking on water and listing sharper to port every time the left takes over, but the unprincipled RINOs do absolutely nothing to right her when they get a chance. In fact, the RINOs actually tack on plenty of their own unconstitutional baggage when they're in power and so our ship of state today is in pretty bad shape.

RINO Romney is one of the worst. We can thank him for being the chief architect of ObamaCare, which if we cannot get overturned and repealed, will finally accomplish the left's major objective of shredding the final remnants of our tattered constitution and ending our God-given Liberty forever (they think).

The liberals believe our constitution is a flawed document written in a different time for different circumstances by rich old racist white men and no longer applies to today's circumstances. They're now even trying to promote the idea that the constitution was never intended to limit or restrict the powers of government.

Like hell! That was and is its primary intent! And we who have sworn an oath to defend it, will defend it--from all enemies, foreign and domestic!

And that's FR's purpose and reason for being.

Romney may be a Republican, and that's questionable, because he's violated nearly every plank in the Republican party's official pro-God, pro-Life, pro-Family, pro-Constitution, pro-Liberty platform, but he's definitely no conservative. In fact his record is that of a statist liberal progressive. And he's a total fraud to boot, with a nasty habit of lying--about everything. He'll do and say anything if he thinks it will help him get elected. He's a two-bit, unprincipled political whore.

Here's Romney's record on some of our primary issues of concern compared to Obama's:

Issue:	Obama	Romney
Pro-Abortion	check	check
Gun-grabber	check	check
Gay rights	check	check
Gov forced healthcare	check	check
Tax payer funded abortion	check	check
Man-made global warming	check	check
Liberal judges	check	check
Liberal appointees	check	check
Ted Kennedy pal	check	check
Proven liar	check	check
Fraud	check	check
Liberal Progressive	check	check
Enemy of Reagan/Bush	check	check
Enemy of the tea party	check	check
Enemy of Liberty	check	check
Defender of the Constitution	no	no
Conservative	no	no
Works across the aisle	no	yes
Architect of ObamaCare	no	yes
Domestic Enemy	check	check
Useful idiot	check	check

All of the above plus much more is documented in the RomneyTruth files on FR. Click the RomneyTruthFile keyword at the top of the main page. Also watch the "New Romney Campaign Video" also linked at the top of the main page. Watch it all the way through. I even saw some clips I'd never seen before. Pretty damning stuff for anyone running for president as a Republican.

Let's face it folks, the elite establishment RINO corps hates the tea party, hates conservatives, are afraid and even ashamed to have us identify ourselves as Republicans, feel we are dangerous extremist, racist, bigoted bible thumping, gun-toting, flag-waving neanderthals. The tea party is the best thing to happen for America since 1776 and our tea party candidates are the best thing for the GOP since Ronald Reagan, but what do the elite establishment RINOs do? They declare us the enemy! They went after Sarah Palin and some of our other tea party candidates with bared fangs and talons. Karl Rove and company were and continue to be as nasty and shameless on the attack as the nastiest lying liberal. Sarah Palin was the most exciting new face in GOP politics in a century and would have been a landslide 57 state victory over the corrupt, lying Marxist/progressive Obama. But the good ol' boys, i.e., the elite establishment corrupt crony capitalist GOP bastards could have none of that. Instead, they've opted to go all in with a corrupt, lying statist/progressive of their own: Willard (the Rat) Romney.

Well, good luck getting the Rat elected without the committed grassroots, pro-life, pro-constitution conservatives or the majority of the tea party.

FR, for one, will not play that game. NO MORE RINOS!!

No Romney. NOT ON FR!! NOT ON MY WATCH!!

Should Romney be "the one," I'll vote for the down-ticket conservatives on the ballot, but I will not vote for an abortionist, gay-rights pushing, gun-grabbing, global-warming advocating, big government healthcare mandating statist/progressive for president!! I'd rather write-in the name of the tea party conservative who best matches my beliefs. Romney is no 80 percenter. Not even close! He's the backstabbing enemy within.

God bless America!!

Long live the Republic!!

[Tennessee Nana]

Williard Mitt Romney will not get my vote...

Ever !!!

[TheOldLady]

So long, No Suprise There (First and Last Post)

Hat Tip to Arrowhead1952 and Jim Thompson

Smart-mouth troll tugs on Jim Thompson's cape one time too many and rides the electric ejector courtesy of The Man Himself




Trolls who ascribe evil motives to others have evil motives themselves



FReepmail TheOldLady to get ON or OFF the ZOT LIGHTNING ping list.

[luvie]

Ole Suprise won THE prize! :)

[stephenjohnbanker]

POIFECT : )

[stephenjohnbanker]

Big Jim Thompson RULES : )

[TheOldLady]

He did, and he doesn’t even know how to spell “surprise,” LOL!

[TheOldLady]

Hi, sweetie pie. I thought I lost you for a while there.

[luvie]

With his “histroy” we shouldn’t have been suprised! :)

[Freedom_Fighter_2001]

[Do Not Make Fun Of His Ears]

>>I’m hoping that after Romney gets his well deserved beat down this season, that he will have the good sense to just disappear from the political scene forever.<<

I agree. Him and RON PAUL. Sheesh.

[Do Not Make Fun Of His Ears]

"The more conservatives in this race, the more full-throated, unapologetic, peddle-to-the-medal conservatives in this race, the greater the opportunity one of them is going to be elected in."

Boy, if that was his impression of Hispandering Perry, did he ever get it wrong! Yes, I am aware Rush has been Perry's cheerleader in the past.

But he never called him his "dream candidate." Never.

And he has never called him out on his weakness on immigration in the same way Mark Levin has.

[TheOldLady]

Yeah, quite a body of work, isn’t it. ;-p

[506Lake]

I agree. Romney destroyed the GOP in MA. He would destroy the conservative movement and Tea Party activism across the country, if elected.

A Essay on Mitt Romney Its damning.

[Prokopton]

My only question is: who around here is supporting Myth?

I have the same question. Seems like there's a lot of discussion on why we should not support someone who no FReepers are supporting. Is it prophylactic or what?

[MHGinTN]

Try thinking a little more deeply: the hateful putdowns of Cain supporters and the irrational smears of Perry AND HIS WIFE, serve the designs of the elitist pubby establishment. These attacks methodologies do not promote Herman Cain or Rick Perry because such effusive crap turns people off to the one they believe the hateful poster supports.

And if you don't believe it, watch how this post will get trashed ... it doesn't require nasty sentences aimed at insulting fellow freepers, to post facts about a candidate you don't support. Reducing turnout will work in the establishment's candidate's favor. Democraps have used this tactic for deacdes. Milt supporters use it so they do not have to expose for whom they are working.

[Prokopton]

it doesn't require nasty sentences aimed at insulting fellow freepers, to post facts about a candidate you don't support.

Unfortunately, even some "conservatives" become emotionally involved with their candidate selection, sometimes to the point of "defending" them with vitriolic posts. Posts do not have to be "rational" and sometimes/often aren't. Although I know FR does have trolls, I think most of the nasty posts are from people lashing out, often because of desperation, when the candidate they support is doing poorly and they don't really know who to blame, so they blame everyone who supports another candidate.

Palin supporters posts became more and more bitter the clearer it became that she would not be the nominee. Perry supporters posts are becoming more an more vitriolic the further his poll numbers confirm he will not be the nominee. Although it's unnecessary and not helpful to anyone, I guess it's just part of human nature.

[MHGinTN]

Yada yada yada ... you’re making noise, not sense.

[MHGinTN]

If you were describing some Internet slough site, I could agree. BUT DAMMIT, THIS IS FREEREPUBLIC, we set the damned standard. Git er dun

[SunkenCiv]

“Suprise”? Wow, no skills, no skills at all. :’)

[BuckeyeTexan]

But he never called him his "dream candidate." Never

Sure he did.

Fox News’ Greta Van Susteren asked Rush Limbaugh during their interview last night who his dream candidate for the 2012 presidential elections would be. The titan of talk radio responded, ”I would like for Rick Perry to get in to it.