Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sarah Palin snorted cocaine off 55 gallon oil drum and had affairs with NBA star and ...
Daily Mail ^ | September 14, 2010 | Unsigned - of course

Posted on 09/14/2011 5:17:57 AM PDT by Zakeet

Complete Headline: Sarah Palin snorted cocaine off 55 gallon oil drum and had affairs with NBA star and husband's business partner: Sensational claims in new book

Sarah Palin snorted cocaine off a 55 gallon oil drum while snowmobiling with friends and had elicit affairs with a top NBA star and one of her husband's business partners, a new book sensationally claims.

In revelations which could strike a devastating blow to the controversial politician's hopes of joining the 2012 presidential race, Mrs Palin is said to have snorted the class A drug off an oil drum with her husband.

Joe McGinniss's book The Rogue: Searching for the Real Sarah Palin, which is due to be published on September 20, also alleges that the former governor of Alaska is far from the traditional family woman she claims to be.

Mrs Palin, 47, had a one-night stand with Miami Heat basketball star Glen Rice less than a year before she eloped with her husband, the book claims.

She is said to have met the 6ft 8ins player in 1987 when he was playing in a college basketball tournament in Alaska and she worked as a sports reporter for KTUU television.

It is also claimed that she carried on an affair with Brad Hanson, who ran a snowmobile dealership with her husband Todd - a betrayal which led to Todd dissolving their business.

(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Alaska
KEYWORDS: bertelsmann; bradhanson; enemedia; gossip; hatinpalin; joemcginniss; msm; palin; palinbook; pds; peepingjoe; racemixing; randomhouse; slander; smellthefear; therogue; waronsarah
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 461-480481-500501-520521-523 next last
To: Zakeet

And after just a few comments, the Daily Mail realized that even for them, they had jumped the shark on this one and shut down further comments.


501 posted on 09/15/2011 7:23:10 AM PDT by Sea Parrot (Democrats creation of the entitlement class will prove out to be their very own Frankenstein monster)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

Oh, nonsense. There is a clear pattern of un-deleted personal attacks on freepers who don’t jump on the palin-wagon by you guys. You are only kidding yourself if you want to pretend that it isn’t so.


502 posted on 09/15/2011 7:51:21 AM PDT by wtc911 ("How you gonna get down that hill?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 498 | View Replies]

To: wtc911
And like I said, you post Palin-attack lying crap from liberal sites that would get you zotted if you did that as a newb. So I guess it balances out.

If you want to have standing to complain about how you are treated on FR, try cleaning up your own act first.

503 posted on 09/15/2011 7:53:54 AM PDT by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 502 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

Really, what did I post from, as you put it, “liberal sites” and who told you I would have gotten zotted?


504 posted on 09/15/2011 9:15:34 AM PDT by wtc911 ("How you gonna get down that hill?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 503 | View Replies]

To: wtc911
The bullcrap you posted about Spenard the other day was straight from liberal anti-Palin talking points, and you joyfully lapped up its inane free-association 'logic'.

You even contradicted yourself on the same thread as to the relevance of the builders's lien on the Palin property. But alas, that's what happens when you buy into liberal spin, you end up spinning yourself.

As to newbs getting zotted for posting liberal hatchet-jobs against conservartives on FR, that's just common knowledge. I guess you probably mourn that you won't have another PDSer in your midst, but that happens with Perry newbie trolls and Bachmann newbie trolls as well.

But my larger point stands - you run with liberal hatchet jobs against Palin that, had they been posted by newbs, would get them the zot. If you truly wish to return the discussion to a more civil level, try sticking to a discussion of Palin over actual issues and not trumped-up liberal ones.

505 posted on 09/15/2011 9:24:21 AM PDT by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 504 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy
Again, nonsense.

What I posted about Spenard are indisputable facts...here they are again...

Spenard received multiple lucrative contracts from Palin(™) administrations at the city and state level.

Spenard paid Palin(™) to be their spokesman between her political positions.

Spenard held a builders lien on the Palin(™) dream house.

Spenard invested money to sponsor the toddster's racing team.

Those are facts, not liberal smears.

If these facts make you uncomfortable then take them up with Mrs. Palin(™).

506 posted on 09/15/2011 9:42:03 AM PDT by wtc911 ("How you gonna get down that hill?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 505 | View Replies]

To: wtc911
No, the point that you infer Spenard into something improper is the spin. The fact is that Spenard was the only building supply in town at the time, so if the Palins were building a home, of course they would use Spenard. The fact is that the bidding for the sports center was done according to law. The fact is that Spenard put a builder's lien on the Palin home, which is a rather odd way to use materials as some kind of payoff to Palin. The fact is that Iron Dog is a big deal in Alaska and sponsoring a winning team is good for business, just as companies sponsoring NASCAR drivers is done not to give Jeff Gordon graft but to instead provide advertising for the company. Likewise for Palin being a spokesperson for Spenard - BETWEEN political gigs.

Your post is a classic example of lying by omission - you leave out the key details that put the points in proper perspective. And then, yet again, you wonder why people slam you for that nonsense.

507 posted on 09/15/2011 9:54:27 AM PDT by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 506 | View Replies]

To: wtc911

Oh, and I left out the final point - the Spenard allegations were investigated and found to be without merit. As are you in this matter.


508 posted on 09/15/2011 9:55:27 AM PDT by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 506 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy
Again, nonsense.

A) You did not dispute the facts and, B) I made no allegations.

You really , really don't like these facts though, that's plain to see.

509 posted on 09/15/2011 10:26:47 AM PDT by wtc911 ("How you gonna get down that hill?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 508 | View Replies]

To: wtc911
A) You did not dispute the facts

I pointed out the facts that were omitted, troll. And omission is the most powerful form of lie.

B) I made no allegations.

You mentioned this story in another thread to infer that Palin was subject to cronyism as well. So you lie, you did make an allegation, you are just not honest enought to admit it.

You may have the last word, I've had enough of lying weasels on this thread.

510 posted on 09/15/2011 10:32:55 AM PDT by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 509 | View Replies]

To: wtc911
A) You did not dispute the facts

I pointed out the facts that were omitted, troll. And omission is the most powerful form of lie.

B) I made no allegations.

You mentioned this story in another thread to infer that Palin was subject to cronyism as well. So you lie directly here, you did make an allegation, you are just not honest enought to admit it.

You may have the last word, I've had enough of lying weasels on this thread.

511 posted on 09/15/2011 10:33:26 AM PDT by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 509 | View Replies]

To: Scanian

I don’t “wager,” I make investments.


512 posted on 09/15/2011 11:42:43 AM PDT by editor-surveyor (Sarah Palin - 2012 !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 490 | View Replies]

To: wardaddy; Scanian

>> “That comment was totally out of line” <<

.
No, it was not; it was an honest, constructive suggestion. I still reccommend that he take it to heart, as a well known issue for that disease.


513 posted on 09/15/2011 11:51:34 AM PDT by editor-surveyor (Sarah Palin - 2012 !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 481 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy
Infer? Sorry son, a statements of facts is not an inference; that requires a conclusion or suggestion of a conclusion. Now, if you deduced a conclusion from that statement of facts don't put it on me.

And, exactly which facts did I leave out, what kind of car they drive, what they had for breakfast?

As I said, these facts really, really bother you...that's too bad.

514 posted on 09/15/2011 2:03:36 PM PDT by wtc911 ("How you gonna get down that hill?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 511 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor; wardaddy; Scanian

No, your comment was totally out of line. It was cruel and utterly mean-spirited. Your attempt to gloss it over is pure chickensh*t.


515 posted on 09/15/2011 2:05:49 PM PDT by wtc911 ("How you gonna get down that hill?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 513 | View Replies]

To: wtc911; wardaddy; Scanian

What is cruel is jerks like you that are so full of hate that they cannot pass up a chance to jump in on something they don’t understand to add another hateful feather to their cap.

Removing emotional barriers is one of the most important steps on the path to health, and more often than not the victim has lived with the issue enough to have buried it like a rock inside of a pearl.

Of course you don’t care about that; all you want is to chalk up a point on your imaginary scorecard.


516 posted on 09/15/2011 3:40:15 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (Sarah Palin - 2012 !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 515 | View Replies]

To: wtc911
"....all my objections to your idol are strictly about her performance as an elected official and her hokey-pokey dance of self enrichment while stringing a bunch of chumps along since quitting her las position."


Don't beat around the bush, tell us how you really feel. :-)
517 posted on 09/15/2011 4:34:59 PM PDT by rob777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 497 | View Replies]

To: rob777

I just did...


518 posted on 09/15/2011 6:48:33 PM PDT by wtc911 ("How you gonna get down that hill?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 517 | View Replies]

To: wardaddy

“makes howlin,illbay and sinkspur seem like sweethearts by comparison”

Ouch! That’s heavy artillery.


519 posted on 09/15/2011 9:51:07 PM PDT by Pelham (Islam. The original Evil Empire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 481 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

Palin does deserve to be treated fairly. This was a slime-job, and I urged caution when reacting to it.

I saw the Gardasil issue the same way you did.

I am not above over-reacting to articles on occasion. I try not to, but I get sucked in sometimes.


520 posted on 09/16/2011 11:46:30 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (McCain 5 yrs Left/1 year right "BAD!" - Republicans 3 yrs Right 1 year Left to elect RINOs. "Good?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 489 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 461-480481-500501-520521-523 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson