Posted on 09/14/2011 5:17:57 AM PDT by Zakeet
Complete Headline: Sarah Palin snorted cocaine off 55 gallon oil drum and had affairs with NBA star and husband's business partner: Sensational claims in new book
Sarah Palin snorted cocaine off a 55 gallon oil drum while snowmobiling with friends and had elicit affairs with a top NBA star and one of her husband's business partners, a new book sensationally claims.
In revelations which could strike a devastating blow to the controversial politician's hopes of joining the 2012 presidential race, Mrs Palin is said to have snorted the class A drug off an oil drum with her husband.
Joe McGinniss's book The Rogue: Searching for the Real Sarah Palin, which is due to be published on September 20, also alleges that the former governor of Alaska is far from the traditional family woman she claims to be.
Mrs Palin, 47, had a one-night stand with Miami Heat basketball star Glen Rice less than a year before she eloped with her husband, the book claims.
She is said to have met the 6ft 8ins player in 1987 when he was playing in a college basketball tournament in Alaska and she worked as a sports reporter for KTUU television.
It is also claimed that she carried on an affair with Brad Hanson, who ran a snowmobile dealership with her husband Todd - a betrayal which led to Todd dissolving their business.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
And after just a few comments, the Daily Mail realized that even for them, they had jumped the shark on this one and shut down further comments.
Oh, nonsense. There is a clear pattern of un-deleted personal attacks on freepers who don’t jump on the palin-wagon by you guys. You are only kidding yourself if you want to pretend that it isn’t so.
If you want to have standing to complain about how you are treated on FR, try cleaning up your own act first.
Really, what did I post from, as you put it, “liberal sites” and who told you I would have gotten zotted?
You even contradicted yourself on the same thread as to the relevance of the builders's lien on the Palin property. But alas, that's what happens when you buy into liberal spin, you end up spinning yourself.
As to newbs getting zotted for posting liberal hatchet-jobs against conservartives on FR, that's just common knowledge. I guess you probably mourn that you won't have another PDSer in your midst, but that happens with Perry newbie trolls and Bachmann newbie trolls as well.
But my larger point stands - you run with liberal hatchet jobs against Palin that, had they been posted by newbs, would get them the zot. If you truly wish to return the discussion to a more civil level, try sticking to a discussion of Palin over actual issues and not trumped-up liberal ones.
What I posted about Spenard are indisputable facts...here they are again...
Spenard received multiple lucrative contracts from Palin(™) administrations at the city and state level.
Spenard paid Palin(™) to be their spokesman between her political positions.
Spenard held a builders lien on the Palin(™) dream house.
Spenard invested money to sponsor the toddster's racing team.
Those are facts, not liberal smears.
If these facts make you uncomfortable then take them up with Mrs. Palin(™).
Your post is a classic example of lying by omission - you leave out the key details that put the points in proper perspective. And then, yet again, you wonder why people slam you for that nonsense.
Oh, and I left out the final point - the Spenard allegations were investigated and found to be without merit. As are you in this matter.
A) You did not dispute the facts and, B) I made no allegations.
You really , really don't like these facts though, that's plain to see.
I pointed out the facts that were omitted, troll. And omission is the most powerful form of lie.
B) I made no allegations.
You mentioned this story in another thread to infer that Palin was subject to cronyism as well. So you lie, you did make an allegation, you are just not honest enought to admit it.
You may have the last word, I've had enough of lying weasels on this thread.
I pointed out the facts that were omitted, troll. And omission is the most powerful form of lie.
B) I made no allegations.
You mentioned this story in another thread to infer that Palin was subject to cronyism as well. So you lie directly here, you did make an allegation, you are just not honest enought to admit it.
You may have the last word, I've had enough of lying weasels on this thread.
I don’t “wager,” I make investments.
>> “That comment was totally out of line” <<
.
No, it was not; it was an honest, constructive suggestion. I still reccommend that he take it to heart, as a well known issue for that disease.
And, exactly which facts did I leave out, what kind of car they drive, what they had for breakfast?
As I said, these facts really, really bother you...that's too bad.
No, your comment was totally out of line. It was cruel and utterly mean-spirited. Your attempt to gloss it over is pure chickensh*t.
What is cruel is jerks like you that are so full of hate that they cannot pass up a chance to jump in on something they don’t understand to add another hateful feather to their cap.
Removing emotional barriers is one of the most important steps on the path to health, and more often than not the victim has lived with the issue enough to have buried it like a rock inside of a pearl.
Of course you don’t care about that; all you want is to chalk up a point on your imaginary scorecard.
I just did...
“makes howlin,illbay and sinkspur seem like sweethearts by comparison”
Ouch! That’s heavy artillery.
Palin does deserve to be treated fairly. This was a slime-job, and I urged caution when reacting to it.
I saw the Gardasil issue the same way you did.
I am not above over-reacting to articles on occasion. I try not to, but I get sucked in sometimes.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.