Posted on 01/30/2011 5:47:11 PM PST by Williams
Scientists said yesterday that they have discovered a tiny genetic mutation that largely explains the first appearance of white skin in humans tens of thousands of years ago, a finding that helps solve one of biology's most enduring mysteries and illuminates one of humanity's greatest sources of strife.
.................
(Excerpt) Read more at theroot.com ...
Certainly a case can be made that Western European civilization brought mankind’s greatest advances, but they would never say Hey, this is how we got all those great Europeans!
The science underlying the article is interesting, but for the reporter to make a racist, all encompassing and historically inacurrate statement is just incredible.
It has been known as a biological fact for about 30 years now that all humans are born genetically black, but some of us carry a recessive gene for dilution of melanin, resulting in a lighter skin coloring.
So what’s your problem, aside from being a little slow on the uptake?
Not much tolerance for us diverse mutant honkeys at the Post...
Besides, every thinking person knows that liberals/progressives/socialists/marxists are in the top two as causations of strife in the world.
The Washington Post launched a new online magazine Monday aimed at a black audience, featuring commentary from leading black writers, along with information on genealogy. Called "The Root," the website is the brain child of Post Chairman Donald Graham and Harvard University professor Henry Louis Gates Jr.
At least one of those names should be familiar. Not surprised Gates is behind this kind of crap. People like him cause certain words to remain in the American lexicon.
Instead we are descended from the San People, and all the 13 different kinds of black folk are ALSO descended from the San People.
The San developed from earlier humans in SOUTHERN African ~ in the Temperate zone.
They were probably well on their way to trimming up to having light skin down there and then, when they moved North, those who got to Eurasia the first just kept right on changing. Those that stayed in Africa, were moving North into more Tropical climate zones and more direct Sunlight. They turned black!
Modern San have obviously mixed considerably with other African tribes ~ however, Nils Van Der Post and other researchers have hypothesized that the San cannot necessarily create fertile offspring with all other blacks ~ just with some!
There's a situation that involves enough Northern Europeans and the Sa'ami that is of enough concern that it's been studied ~ to little avail.
It's called Indeterminant Infertility. That's where you and somebody else get together and have chilluns. Let's say you have 8 kids. 4 of them will be infertile for no discernible reason. At the same time there are CERTAIN Sa'ami males with what appears to be a workaround for the problem ~ super sperm! The females with indeterminant infertility can sometimes hit if visited by such a man.
No one has studied the situation enough to pin everything down and these days the Sa'ami are sober and monogamous, so that just ruins everybody's research.
Interestingly enough a "related population" still live in the Orkneys, and Charles Darwin, who had a fair number of ancestors from there, married a first-cousin ~ four of their 8 offspring were infertile!
I suspect the San/Bantu breeding problems, to the degree they exist, have something to do with this other system. It's probably far more widespread than we imagine. So, not everything is onesy-twosy, sometimes it onesy-whole buncha' women, and nothing at alsy!
Every morning I wake up, I give thanks to god I’m a white man.
What is the diluting agent for melanin? I want to know what additional substance is inside me. I may withdraw a small portion and study it.
Maybe there's a market for it.
It is a pretty well established fact all people are born right-handed, but only the greatest of us can overcome it and thank God for the evolutionary mutation that made white people or we would still be swinging from the trees.
If you ever needed ANY proof the the media is BIASED, this is it.
And I bet some ignoramus white lib wrote it.
Is there a genetic mutation for blue skin? I want to be a Smurf or a Navi!
Thanks for that reply. I can’t count how many different versions I’ve read of how we got where we are as a species. Then, begs the question, what are we evolving into, or, have we stopped? Right now we have white, black and red/Asian humanoids. From each one of those there are transcended types. Is a puzzlement.
I always just knew I was a mutant! Now it is confirmed.
· join list or digest · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark · post a topic · subscribe · |
|||
Antiquity Journal & archive Archaeologica Archaeology Archaeology Channel BAR Bronze Age Forum Discover Dogpile Eurekalert LiveScience Mirabilis.ca Nat Geographic PhysOrg Science Daily Science News Texas AM Yahoo Excerpt, or Link only? |
|
||
· Science topic · science keyword · Books/Literature topic · pages keyword · |
Well, of course. I should have known that, already.
That "euthanizing" part is going to hurt my marketing plan.
Just asked my wife. It seems I have stopped.
LOL
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.