LTC Lakin's Appeal Denied

U.S. Army Court of Criminal Appeals ^ | 10/12/10 | Clerk of the Court

[BuckeyeTexan]

On consideration of the Petition for Extraordinary Relief in the Nature of a Writ of Mandamus and Application for a Stay of Proceedings, the petition is DENIED.

[BuckeyeTexan]

Wrong. Liberals spewing garbage, spreading misinformation, and attacking freepers don’t belong here.

[butterdezillion]

I’ve got in my mind the photocopiers where there’s a drum of powder toner and there’s some kind of heat applied to make the image permanent. Is that the kind of deal we’d be talking about?

But it sounds like El Sordo wasn’t talking about a smudge but more like maybe something being transferred because it was pressed against the other paper. What was it you were saying about transfers happening because of some machine they go through, like in the mail?

[MissTickly]

Yes, excess toner transfers. No one calls it ‘wet’ toner but you. Cold toner transfers, too, if there’s an excess.

I dropped a cartridge on my office floor once—i am very familiar with toner—up close and personal-like.

Please stop talking to me now, you freaking stupid idiotic obot.

[Mr Rogers]

“When private individuals of one nation spread themselves through another as business or caprice may direct, mingling indiscriminately with the inhabitants of that other, or when merchant vessels enter for the purposes of trade, it would be obviously inconvenient and dangerous to society, and would subject the laws to continual infraction and the government to degradation, if such individuals or merchants did not owe temporary and local allegiance and were not amenable to the jurisdiction of the country. Nor can the foreign sovereign have any motive for wishing such exemption. His subjects thus passing into foreign countries are not employed by him, nor are they engaged in national pursuits. Consequently there are powerful motives for not exempting persons of this description from the jurisdiction of the country in which they are found, and no one motive for requiring it. The implied license, therefore, under which they enter can never be construed to grant such exemption.”

The Exchange v. McFaddon, 11 U.S. 7 Cranch 116 116 (1812)

http://supreme.justia.com/us/11/116/case.html

[butterdezillion]

Thanks. That photo just makes me smile, and I needed that right now. =)

[MissTickly]

Keyword to this article: trollbuckeyetexan;

and you’re tell ing me to leave.

BDZ, I must have hit the nail on the head for all this fuss and muss!=)

I’m not going anywhere until Jim Rob tells me to.

[jamese777]

When you say that Blagojevich was a liability that explains all the examples you gave. It was not justice that held those people accountable. It was politics. Nixon resigned. Plame was outed by her own husband and by Richard Armitage, who was never held legally accountable; instead, Scooter Libby landed in jail for being just as “confused” as the media entities who went scot free. Whitewater was a very bad joke. Blago was a joke; one well-placed person with an agenda was able to screw that totally up, and the investigation was hindered by a desire to protect Obama.

The stuff you’re giving as examples all prove the opposite thing: that politics is the only thing ruling in this country right now, not justice.

Pilate said to Jesus, “What is truth?” He had seen the politics and had been told that if he had one more dust-up with the Jews he would be removed from the “Friends of Caesar” Club - removal by mandatory suicide. He knew he had to condemn an innocent Man to death or die himself - because politics, not truth, is the way of the world.

All the examples you cited make that very case. The innocent sit in jail and the guilty go free - all depending on who your friends are and how useful you are to them at the time.

But I say if we don’t have truthfulness in our dealings with each other we have nothing. What is truth? Critical.

---

The fact remains that Grand Jury investigations were held in each and every instance and legal consequences via indictments ensued from those investigations.

You wouldn’t be satisfied with an Obama resignation like Nixon’s? You wouldn’t be satisfied with an Obama criminal conviction, impeachment and removal like Blagojevich’s? You wouldn’t be satisfied with an Obama criminal conviction and commutation of his sentence like Scooter Libby? You wouldn’t be satisfied with multiple Obama criminal convictions and the need for a pardon by President Biden?

I believe that Pontius Pilate and Jesus of Nazereth were a few years before the Grand Jury era. But can you tell me of the resolution of any major national political scandal that didn’t involve a Grand Jury investigation?

It seems to me that you aren’t the least bit interested in a real resolution of the Obama eligibility issue, you just like to whine about it and resolving it in a criminal court of law would deprive you of your ability to continue to whine.

[MissTickly]

I said the pressure from the mail sorting equipment has caused ink/toner smudging on projects I’ve worked on.

So yes, I admit that it’s possible that toner has transferred.

To the back of the BC photocopy but none on the inside of the envelope? You tell me if you think that’s plausible.

[El Sordo]

When I say “a line” I do not mean a linear stripe. I mean groups of text and numbers as well as the graphic “boxes” around them. It’s a recognizable mirror image of information from the receipt.

It was there, and I cannot figure out for the life of me why MT wishes to take issue with this.

It’s actually a bit amusing to me. My statement appears to have satisfied, to at least some extent, a few folks who took issue with the validity of the document, yet drove MT to apoplexy. I doan’ unnerstan’ eet..

[butterdezillion]

I don’t see her spreading misinformation. I see her making observations. Unless you’re saying the images she’s posted are altered, I’m not sure what you mean by misinformation.

[BuckeyeTexan]

I’m a computer programmer, systems administrator, and DBA. A significant portion of the code I’ve written was for printing documents, specifically prescription labels, with images. I’ll forget more about printers, forms, and images than you’ll ever hope to learn. Since you’re not a programmer, you’d have no idea what terminology we use.

Take your B.S. somewhere else, libtard.

[Las Vegas Ron]

Dig all you want to justify this traitor in office Rogers, do not post to me again.

[BuckeyeTexan]

Yeah, my friend El Sordo added that keyword as joke when I “ranted” that jamese777 had two keywords and I had none.

You gotta make it personal at this point ... cuz you got nothin’.

[Jonah Vark]

Shrug.
If you remain skeptical, that’s fine.
The documents are in Danae’s possession. I have no control over them and will make no attempt to do so.
If Danae were to ask for my advice, it would be not to bother with any additional efforts in attempt to convince you.
Danae has demonstrated that long forms are still available.
If you do not accept this, that’s not my concern.

---

El Sordo,

That is very wise advice. Why on earth would Danae go to all the trouble of forging documents and put herself in jeopardy of committing a crime? I agree that she need not be bullied into taking more photos to prove her integrity.

I’m into genealogy and the HDOH should have all birth certificates in their possession, however older copies may also be on microfilm. Many, many original documents are released by agencies throughout the country for genealogy purposes.

[butterdezillion]

“Whining” is the only thing I have standing to do. And that is precisely my point.

Actually what I’ve been doing is investigating. I’ve documented anomalies and law-breaking that “makes Watergate look like a kiddie pool”, to borrow from Danae. I have gone to law enforcement personnel. They have ignored me.

With US attorneys appointed by Obama, an AG who violates the law himself in favor of his buddies, and state AG’s who don’t necessarily have jurisdiction (and need to get re-elected with the help of a media that ridicules this issue), what do the common people like me have in our arsenal, to get anybody with authority to actually do something about this?

[STE=Q]

I wrote:

Video demonstrates that Factcheck.org lied about what DR. Chiyome Fukino said in her official press release of October 31, 2008. Also three other statements by the Officials at the Hawaii Department of Health, lead us to believe that the Certification of Live Birth, posted online by Obama is a forgery.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Iy8i61DmAg

Now, in regards to the lack of confirmation of Obama’s online “Certification” of live birth (not a CERTIFICATE of live birth, commonly known as a birth CERTIFICATE)we will hear objections that Hawaii was protecting the”privacy” of Obama by not confirming that the document that he posted online, mirrored the records Hawaii had of said document.

However, how would that defend Obama’s “privacy” if he, himself (people under his direction and control) had placed the document with the obvious intention to be viewed by the public?

And further, if “privacy” were an issue, he could easily grant Hawaii permission to state that, in fact, said document mirrors the document(S)they have at the HDOH?

---

jamese777 wrote:

However Dr. Fukino backed up the internet posted COLB when she testified before the Hawai’i Senate Judiciary and Governmental Operations Committee. She said the following:

Testimony of Chiyome Fukino, M.D.
Director of Health February 23, 2010
Hawaii Senate Committee on Judiciary and Government Operations

“For more than a year, the Department of Health has continued to receive approximately 50 e-mail inquiries a month seeking access to President Barack Obama’s birth certificate IN SPITE OF THE FACT THAT PRESIDENT OBAMA HAS POSTED A COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE ON HIS FORMER CAMPAIGN WEBSITE. Hawaii is a ‘closed records’ state, meaning that vital records are available only to those with a direct and tangible interest as defined by statute; hence, they are not subject to disclosure under public records requests.”

---

I write:

First, I think we have to keep in mind that the “COLB” that Obama has posted is — and says — CERTIFICATION of live birth: Not CERTIFICATE of live birth.

This is what a real “long form” CERTIFICATE Of Live Birth looks like (see link):

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-gop/2166631/posts?page=86#86

So when Fukino parses... “OBAMA HAS POSTED A COPY OF THE ‘CERTIFICATE’ ON HIS FORMER CAMPAIGN WEBSITE” she is being less than precise — and maybe practicing a bit of subterfuge.

A “CERTIFICATION of live birth” is not a COPY of a “CERTIFICATE of live birth,” rather, it is an abstact of same.

Fukino has made statements that even the Attorney General of Hawaii has refused to back up (see link):

http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/02/02/hi-attorney-generals-office-refuses-to-corroborate-obamas-hi-birth/

“In correspondence with The Post & Email, Jill T. Nagamine, Deputy Attorney General for the State of Hawaii, has made it clear that her office will not corroborate or back in any way the July 27, 2009 Statement of Dr. Chiyome Fukino, Director of the Hawaii Department of Health, which declared Obama Hawaiian-born and a ‘natural-born American citizen’.”

---

jamese777 wrote:

“Obama’s permission for a release is not needed”

---

I write:

Maybe.

However, his refusal to release a true CERTIFICATE Of Live Birth (not a “certification”) is generating unnecessary controversy.

Why should concerned citizens have to take their President to court to show what 99.999% percent of Americans have at their disposal?... a true “long form” Birth Certificate!

---

jamese777 wrote:

Any judge in America where Barack Hussein Obama’s name appeared on a presidential ballot could issue a subpoena for Obama’s original birth records and under Hawai’i law, the Department of Health would honor releasing the vital records to: “a person whose right to inspect or obtain a certified copy of the record is established by AN ORDER OF A COURT OF COMPETENT JURISDICTION.”
“Hawai’i Revised Statutes 339-18(b)(9)

I find it fascinating that NO interested parties like John McCain, Sarah Palin, the Republican National Committee, 41 Republican Senators and any of 178 Republican members of the House of Representatives or any of 23 Republican Governors have sought such a subpoena from a friendly judge.
Even more interesting is the fact that no major conservative, constitutional law firm has bothered to find the right plaintiff with legal standing to challenge Obama’s eligibility.

All the major conservative constitutional law firms have stayed away from this issue.

---

I write:

As you yourself have surmised, these folks don’t want to step into the controversy that the President has precipitated.

Another thing to consider is that the people who are in a possition to do the most — are people in POWER!

Presidents come and go... and these people, I’m sure, intend to remain in power, after obama is gone.

Robert Gibbs, white House press secretary, practically “looses it” when asked by a brave reporter, about Obama’s use of a Connecticut social Security number.

Gibs mumbles about the “birth certificate”(who mentioned a birth certificate?)...and he never does answer the “yes” or “no” question he was asked. (see link)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FdJt6zsMREY&feature=related

STE=Q

[presently no screen name]

WOW! Coming for you, I’m flattered. Thank you. I planned on selling my bridge to nowhere but Alaska already bought it. It was called ‘Follow me’. ;)

Your work here is above and beyond and is both tedious and trying, I am sure. A true asset to FR - what makes FR what it is. So thank you!

[El Sordo]

Someone else beat me to that one.

I added ‘DoublePostTexan’ so you’d have two.

[butterdezillion]

Well, the problem is that if the line from the bottom of the receipt transferred directly to the bottom of the back of the BC copy, then the receipt had to be folded behind the BC. But the receipt is the paper that had Danae’s address on it, to show through the window in the envelope. If that page was folded behind the BC copy, then there was no way for the address to show in the window.

Somebody suggested that the receipt was in the front and when it was folded what was on the bottom of the receipt transferred onto the back of the BC copy. But I put two pieces of paper together and tested out what would happen that way. I wrote on the bottom of page A, put it on top of page B, tri-folded it, and then traced where the writing would show up on the back of Page B if there was an ink transfer. What was on the bottom of page A shows up at the top of the back of page B, right-side-up but inverted.

So it raises questions. And that’s why Miss Tickly brought this up.

[BuckeyeTexan]

Toner is considered “wet” when there is excess toner.

Should read: Toner is considered “wet” when there is excess hot toner.