LTC Lakin's Appeal Denied

U.S. Army Court of Criminal Appeals ^ | 10/12/10 | Clerk of the Court

[BuckeyeTexan]

On consideration of the Petition for Extraordinary Relief in the Nature of a Writ of Mandamus and Application for a Stay of Proceedings, the petition is DENIED.

[El Sordo]

Ya think that maybe she’s one of those paid Democrat trolls that we’re always hearing about?

[BuckeyeTexan]

This story SMELLS BAD.

I tell you what smells bad ... the fact that a liberal is allowed to call freepers liars. Any liberal posting at FR should mind her manners and have polite discussion.

If birthers and anti-birthers have heated discussions, that's fine. We're all freepers interested in promoting conservative issues.

You shouldn't even be a freeper. You're a liberal. Get lost.

[BuckeyeTexan]

My assumptions and speculation about alternate possibilities didn’t cause me to call two freepers liars.

Hers did.

She doesn’t belong here.

[MissTickly]

Make me.

I guarantee you are a liberal, too: PAID OBOT.

(psst. I have had several private message that you are babycakes. You’re busted.)

[BuckeyeTexan]

Five days in an envelope

How ignorant are you? The toner wouldn't be "wet" for that length of time. The only one suspending logic here would be you, but that's what I would expect from a liberal.

[MissTickly]

Who cares what you think. Go cry to your mommy. Baby.

You aren’t liked around here, that much is clear.

[butterdezillion]

El Sordo, you’re saying it was the dark straight line at the bottom of the receipt and it was transferred onto the bottom of the back of the BC copy? Or was it the print above the solid line, or what?

[BuckeyeTexan]

I have had several private message that you are babycakes. You’re busted.

One has only to read my posting history to see that I am a conservative. Private messages don't prove anything. So, no busting happened.

[BuckeyeTexan]

You aren’t liked around here, that much is clear.

That doesn't change your morally repugnant behavior on this thread.

[MissTickly]

Toner isn’t wet, you dumb*ss. It’s a powder. You are too stupid for words.

“Laser toner is a powder instead of the liquid form of ink found in inkjet printers and pens. Even though laser toner powder may look like other types of powder, it will stain clothing, hands and most surfaces it comes in contact with. To keep the toner from spilling, it is kept in a toner cartridge, which releases the needed amount of the powder in printers to print onto pages.

Read more: What is Laser Printer Toner? | eHow.com http://www.ehow.com/about_6124078_laser-printer-toner_.html#ixzz13KLC0Mes";

[MissTickly]

Kiss my butt again, Obot.

[BuckeyeTexan]

Yeah, that’s why the word wet was in quotes.

[jamese777]

“It is an established maxim that birth is a criterion of allegiance. Birth however derives its force sometimes from place and sometimes from parentage, but in general place is the most certain criterion; it is what applies in the United States; it will therefore be unnecessary to investigate any other.”— James Madison, May 22, 1789 from the floor of the House of Representatives
Madison’s Papers 12:179—82

US Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia believes that citizenship is based on “Jus Soli”

Jus soli citizenship is based on the land of birth and jus sanguinis is citizenship based on parentage. In the oral arguments of Tuan Anh Nguyen v. INS (No. 99-2071), Justice Scalia made it clear that his view is that natural born citizenship, the requirement to be president, is based on jus soli (birth in the United States).

Here is the relevant section from the oral arguements transcript:

Justice Scalia: … I mean, isn’t it clear that the natural born requirement in the Constitution was intended explicitly to exclude some Englishmen who had come here and spent some time here and then went back and raised their families in England?

They did not want that.

They wanted natural born Americans.

[Ms.]. Davis: Yes, by the same token…

Justice Scalia: That is jus soli, isn’t it?

[Ms.] Davis: By the same token, one could say that the provision would apply now to ensure that Congress can’t apply suspect classifications to keep certain individuals from aspiring to those offices.

Justice Scalia: Well, maybe.

I’m just referring to the meaning of natural born within the Constitution.

I don’t think you’re disagreeing.

It requires jus soli, doesn’t it?

[Tex-Con-Man]

You aren’t liked around here, that much is clear.

Well...the double posting thing managed to unite birthers and anti-birthers against him momentarily, but other than that, you're just makin' crap up.

[rolling_stone]

[MissTickly]

Why was the word ‘wet’ there at all? Toner’s not ever wet, it doesn’t dry and if it is smudgeable one day—it will be the next until the excess powder has rubbed off.

Get it? Got it? Good.

[butterdezillion]

Anybody who is interested in finding out the truth should belong here. The truth is never an enemy. It’s often uncomfortable but it’s never an enemy.

[MissTickly]

Really, I have spent more time arguing garbage with you than you ever deserved.

You go back to Mr. Obama and you tell him I am on to him and his little team of paid obots. Tell him he can kiss my butt, too.

You have wasted my evening with your crap. Gross.

[BuckeyeTexan]

Toner is considered “wet” when there is excess toner. Toner is transferred to the paper by heat. “Dry” toner is actually cold toner.

The fact that you want to make an issue out of “wet” toner tells me exactly how much you know about printers, which is very little.

[Mr Rogers]

"The real object of the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution, in qualifying the words, "All persons born in the United States" by the addition "and subject to the jurisdiction thereof," would appear to have been to exclude, by the fewest and fittest words (besides children of members of the Indian tribes, standing in a peculiar relation to the National Government, unknown to the common law), the two classes of cases -- children born of alien enemies in hostile occupation and children of diplomatic representatives of a foreign State -- both of which, as has already been shown, by the law of England and by our own law from the time of the first settlement of the English colonies in America, had been recognized exceptions to the fundamental rule of citizenship by birth within the country. Calvin's Case, 7 Rep. 1, 18b; Cockburn on Nationality, 7; Dicey Conflict of Laws, 177; Inglis v. Sailors' Snug Harbor, 3 Pet. 99, 155; 2 Kent Com. 39, 42."

"From the first organization of the National Government under the Constitution, the naturalization acts of the United States, in providing for the admission of aliens to citizenship by judicial proceedings, uniformly required every applicant to have resided for a certain time "within the limits and under the jurisdiction of the United States," and thus applied the words "under the jurisdiction of the United States" to aliens residing here before they had taken an oath to support the Constitution of the United States, or had renounced allegiance [p687] to a foreign government."

"These opinions go to show that, since the adoption of the Fourteenth Amendment, the executive branch of the Government, the one charged with the duty of protecting American citizens abroad against unjust treatment by other nations, has taken the same view of the act of Congress of 1855, declaring children born abroad of American citizens to be themselves citizens, which, as mentioned in a former part of this opinion, the British Foreign Office has taken of similar acts of Parliament -- holding that such statutes cannot, consistently with our own established rule of citizenship by birth in this country, operate extraterritorially so far as to relieve any person born and residing in a foreign country and subject to its government, from his allegiance to that country."

"The foregoing considerations and authorities irresistibly lead us to these conclusions: the Fourteenth Amendment affirms the ancient and fundamental rule of citizenship by birth within the territory, in the allegiance and under the protection of the country, including all children here born of resident aliens, with the exceptions or qualifications (as old as the rule itself) of children of foreign sovereigns or their ministers, or born on foreign public ships, or of enemies within and during a hostile occupation of part of our territory, and with the single additional exception of children of members of the Indian tribes owing direct allegiance to their several tribes. The Amendment, in clear words and in manifest intent, includes the children born, within the territory of the United States, of all other persons, of whatever race or color, domiciled within the United States. Every citizen or subject of another country, while domiciled here, is within the allegiance and the protection, and consequently subject to the jurisdiction, of the United States. His allegiance to the United States is direct and immediate, and, although but local and temporary, continuing only so long as he remains within our territory, is yet, in the words of Lord Coke in Calvin's Case, 7 Rep. 6a, "strong enough to make a natural subject, for if he hath issue here, that issue is a natural-born subject;" and his child, as said by Mr. Binney in his essay before quoted, "if born in the country, is as much a citizen as the natural-born child of a citizen, and by operation of the same principle." It can hardly be denied that an alien is completely subject to the political jurisdiction of the country in which he resides..."

Hate to break it to you patlin, but the US Supreme Court has long since ruled against your interpretation.