Well, the problem is that if the line from the bottom of the receipt transferred directly to the bottom of the back of the BC copy, then the receipt had to be folded behind the BC. But the receipt is the paper that had Danae’s address on it, to show through the window in the envelope. If that page was folded behind the BC copy, then there was no way for the address to show in the window.
Somebody suggested that the receipt was in the front and when it was folded what was on the bottom of the receipt transferred onto the back of the BC copy. But I put two pieces of paper together and tested out what would happen that way. I wrote on the bottom of page A, put it on top of page B, tri-folded it, and then traced where the writing would show up on the back of Page B if there was an ink transfer. What was on the bottom of page A shows up at the top of the back of page B, right-side-up but inverted.
So it raises questions. And that’s why Miss Tickly brought this up.
I can only speculate how it got there, but there it was.
Here’s a question. Why does this matter?
Would it have been any better if I hadn’t noticed it or if it wasn’t there?
What MissTickly fails to understand, because she clearly knows very little about printers, is that the “wet” toner (which is specifically heated, excess toner for those who freaking care) could have transferred to the back of the long-form right after it printed. The documents didn’t have to be folded together in order for the transfer to take place.
Great experiment!!!
I didn’t realize it would be at the top so thanks for pointing it out.=)