When I say “a line” I do not mean a linear stripe. I mean groups of text and numbers as well as the graphic “boxes” around them. It’s a recognizable mirror image of information from the receipt.
It was there, and I cannot figure out for the life of me why MT wishes to take issue with this.
It’s actually a bit amusing to me. My statement appears to have satisfied, to at least some extent, a few folks who took issue with the validity of the document, yet drove MT to apoplexy. I doan’ unnerstan’ eet..
Well, the problem is that if the line from the bottom of the receipt transferred directly to the bottom of the back of the BC copy, then the receipt had to be folded behind the BC. But the receipt is the paper that had Danae’s address on it, to show through the window in the envelope. If that page was folded behind the BC copy, then there was no way for the address to show in the window.
Somebody suggested that the receipt was in the front and when it was folded what was on the bottom of the receipt transferred onto the back of the BC copy. But I put two pieces of paper together and tested out what would happen that way. I wrote on the bottom of page A, put it on top of page B, tri-folded it, and then traced where the writing would show up on the back of Page B if there was an ink transfer. What was on the bottom of page A shows up at the top of the back of page B, right-side-up but inverted.
So it raises questions. And that’s why Miss Tickly brought this up.