Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

8th state says guns beyond feds' control(AK)
WND ^ | 28 May, 2010 | Bob Unruh

Posted on 05/28/2010 9:48:45 AM PDT by marktwain

Alaska has become the eighth state to declare that firearms made, sold and owned in the state are beyond the reach of the federal bureaucrats along the Potomac, with Gov. Sean Parnell's signature on the plan today.

"The Alaska Firearms Freedom Act frees Alaskans from overly bureaucratic and restrictive federal firearm regulation, and allows our state to assume the responsibility for regulation," said Rep. Mike Kelly, the lead sponsor on the plan endorsed by lawmakers in the recently closed session of the Alaska Legislature.

"The Interstate Commerce Clause is used by the federal government to regulate firearms that cross state borders. The Alaska Firearms Freedom Act makes it clear that Alaskans will be responsible for firearms that are made in Alaska, for use in Alaska, and have 'Made in Alaska' stamped on them.

"Outdoorsmen, hunters and all Alaskans defending and feeding their families, and protecting their property, should welcome this new law," he said.

Here are answers to all your questions about guns, ammunition and accessories.

The law also requires the state to defend any Alaskan who is "prosecuted by the federal government under their authority to regulate interstate commerce."

"We welcome Alaska into this states' rights liberty march," said Gary Marbut of the Montana Shooting Sports Association.

(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 10thamendment; ak; banglist; constitution; gun; statesrights
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last
We will see if Justice has re found his priciples after Raich.
1 posted on 05/28/2010 9:48:45 AM PDT by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: marktwain

Wow!


2 posted on 05/28/2010 9:50:30 AM PDT by VeniVidiVici (Everyone needs valid ID except illegal aliens and the President - only in America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain
“We will see if Justice has re found his priciples after Raich.”

Should be: “We will see if Justice Scalia has refound his principles after Gonzales v. Raich.”

3 posted on 05/28/2010 9:53:27 AM PDT by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

Go Alaska!


4 posted on 05/28/2010 9:53:58 AM PDT by Professional
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

It needs to includes machine guns and other NFA items. Mandating that the state provide legal representation to any accused individuals is a great addition, though.


5 posted on 05/28/2010 9:54:00 AM PDT by Dayman (My 1919a4 is named Charlotte. When I light her up she has the voice of an angel.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ForGod'sSake

Ping.


6 posted on 05/28/2010 9:55:06 AM PDT by Army Air Corps (Four fried chickens and a coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

We need to go beyond this and gut the commerce clause completely. It is too easy to abuse.


7 posted on 05/28/2010 9:58:45 AM PDT by SWAMPSNIPER (The Second Amendment, A Matter Of Fact, Not A Matter Of Opinion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

Gotta love the states stepping up and declaring their rights against the usurper. Funny, I’ve never seen this much “push back” from the states...probably because no pres has been as abusive to state’s rights as O-A-Hole.


8 posted on 05/28/2010 10:21:20 AM PDT by Mich Patriot (Republicans believe every day is the Fourth of July, but democrats believe every day is April 15th.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

This is fantastic. Can we have this in California too?


9 posted on 05/28/2010 10:22:25 AM PDT by aught-6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: harpseal; TexasCowboy; nunya bidness; AAABEST; Travis McGee; Squantos; Shooter 2.5; wku man; SLB; ..
Outstanding. MT, TN, WY, UT, SD, AZ, KS and now AK makes eight.

Click the Gadsden flag for pro-gun resources!

10 posted on 05/28/2010 10:31:52 AM PDT by Joe Brower (Sheep have three speeds: "graze", "stampede" and "cower".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SWAMPSNIPER

They use it for everything but commerce.

Is there a ready reference for which states have good laws vs. which states have bad laws?


11 posted on 05/28/2010 10:33:24 AM PDT by chuck_the_tv_out ( <<< click my name: now featuring Freeper classifieds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

With no teeth in the law, it’s all rhetoric.


12 posted on 05/28/2010 10:37:20 AM PDT by Noumenon ("Upon what meat doth this our Caesar feed, that he has grown so great?" - Julius Caesar)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain
Tom Emmer, the Republican State Rep running for Governor, tried getting a similar bill passed here in MN.

DFL shot it down.

I HATE the DFL. Union commie thugs... Their only solution to EVERY problem appears to be "higher taxes".

13 posted on 05/28/2010 10:38:28 AM PDT by Dead Corpse (III, Alarm and Muster)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain
and allows our state to assume the responsibility for regulation,"

The 2nd and 10th A say otherwise.

What part of shall not be infringed do these people not get?

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

14 posted on 05/28/2010 10:52:41 AM PDT by Las Vegas Ron ("Because without America, there is no free world" - Canada Free Press - MSM, where are you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dayman
It needs to includes machine guns and other NFA items.

That's what I keep saying about all laws like this passed. If they don't include everything, and I mean everything, then they're pretty much useless posturing.

I'm not sure if Texas has one of these yet, but some state needs to grow a pair and include full autos, suppressors, launchers/Masterkey system; basically everything you can put on a gun.

15 posted on 05/28/2010 11:09:53 AM PDT by wastedyears (The Founders revolted for less.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Noumenon
You got to remember that here in Alaska, many fed laws & regs are not enforced by the state police and not respected or adhered to by Alaskans. It's not like back east at all. I wouldn't make back in Pennsylvania a week without being locked up for something or another;;; after living in Ak close to 20 years. We haven't had pistol permits for around 10 years, state found that Alaskans all had guns on them and nobody bothered getting permits. If America realized the king had no clothes. we'd be a better country. Our local Indians figured this out many years back; and they don't mess with the Indians one bit.

The fed park people don't know what to do when the entire community comes unglued over regulations that are matter of fact back east. You see if the crap hits the fan, it reflects on park ranger in charge in a negative manner. He gets blamed by higher ups so they don't take the fall and usually gets demoted and transferred. So usually the park people are quite easy going and look the other way every time they can. Trouble is they get heat from the political higher ups to enforce their plans. I have gotten along with all the park rangers here and actually kinda like them. We did have one many years back that had to escorted out of here with police protection after he got outta hand but that's not the norm. We have a new guy who said if lower 48 greenies didn't hear wolves when they visited our park, he wasn't doing his job. That set people off who all agreed maybe he should start studying the moose not wolves. This guy ain't gonna last, handwriting on the wall.

16 posted on 05/28/2010 11:19:39 AM PDT by Eska
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: aught-6

In your wildest dreams. But I guess anything is possible.


17 posted on 05/28/2010 12:32:46 PM PDT by P8riot (I carry a gun because I can't carry a cop.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse
I HATE the DFL.

It takes living in MN to understand completely.

18 posted on 05/28/2010 4:15:52 PM PDT by EGPWS (Trust in God, question everyone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Dayman
-- Mandating that the state provide legal representation to any accused individuals is a great addition ... --

An early version of Montana's proposed law had that, too, but it was amended out before being passed into law.

The statutes will be tested in federal courts, which will apply SCOTUS precedent and find the state laws to be unconstitutional. These ruling will be upheld on appeal, and SCOTUS will deny hearing the cases.

The federal government and federal courts are corrupt on 2nd amendment legislation and jurisprudence - they have ZERO moral authority, as the decisions are intellectually defective, in obvious ways.

19 posted on 05/28/2010 4:23:46 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: EGPWS

It’s a special kind of loathing. The DFL are the Communists that other Socialists look at as being “a bit extreme”.


20 posted on 05/28/2010 5:55:25 PM PDT by Dead Corpse (III, Alarm and Muster)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson