Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

An interesting accounting of what happened this morning.
1 posted on 03/04/2010 2:45:18 PM PST by OldDeckHand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last
To: RummyChick

Ping to an addendum to the Robert’s story. I thought you might be interested.


2 posted on 03/04/2010 2:46:18 PM PST by OldDeckHand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: OldDeckHand

I’m just surprised Obama didn’t try to accept his resignation on the rumor.


3 posted on 03/04/2010 2:47:27 PM PST by DoughtyOne (If we as Republicans can't clean up our house, who can or will? Just say no to MeCain(D).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: OldDeckHand

That professor needs to turn around and notice how many of his students spend the class with a text messaging device in their hands.


4 posted on 03/04/2010 2:51:34 PM PST by AnotherUnixGeek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: OldDeckHand

Yet another reason why 1Ls shouldn’t have laptops in class.


5 posted on 03/04/2010 2:53:14 PM PST by The Pack Knight (Duty, Honor, Country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: OldDeckHand

At least a couple of posters here on FR thought it was worth the risk of looking like completely gullible dolts in order to be the first to post BREAKING NEWS!!!!!


6 posted on 03/04/2010 2:54:10 PM PST by jiggyboy (Ten per cent of poll respondents are either lying or insane)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: OldDeckHand

What a stupid, reckless thing for the professor to do. Of course, it’s possible that it wasn’t an accident...


8 posted on 03/04/2010 2:54:57 PM PST by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: OldDeckHand

There are more than a few Freepers who should be ashamed of themselves - mortified, really - over their behavior on the rumor thread this morning. Some of it was absolutely disgusting. This is not the DUmpster, and those Freepers need to remind themselves of that.


9 posted on 03/04/2010 2:55:23 PM PST by xjcsa (Ridiculing the ridiculous since the day I was born.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: OldDeckHand

Just a Progressive’s wet dream....


10 posted on 03/04/2010 2:57:55 PM PST by expatpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: OldDeckHand

The idiot who apparently started it:

http://www.law.georgetown.edu/faculty/facinfo/tab_faculty.cfm?Status=Faculty&ID=333


11 posted on 03/04/2010 2:58:13 PM PST by savedbygrace (You are only leading if people follow. Otherwise, you just wandered off.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: OldDeckHand

Drudge was too darn eager to publish this to his discredit.


15 posted on 03/04/2010 3:02:00 PM PST by Jean S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: OldDeckHand

Bump


16 posted on 03/04/2010 3:02:53 PM PST by BunnySlippers (I LOVE BULL MARKETS . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: OldDeckHand
UPDATE: The Radar retraction begins as follows: “Despite considering resigning from the U.S. Supreme Court, Chief Justice John Roberts will stay on the bench, RadarOnline.com has exclusively learned.”

Does Dan Rather work for the Radar now?
17 posted on 03/04/2010 3:03:08 PM PST by The Pack Knight (Duty, Honor, Country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: OldDeckHand

Everyone is wondering: Where did that erroneous rumor of an imminent retirement by Chief Justice John Roberts come from?

___________________________________

Many FReepers believe Rahm was bored today. Decided to stir the pot.

I believe it.


18 posted on 03/04/2010 3:03:50 PM PST by Responsibility2nd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: OldDeckHand

Thank God it’s not true.

I almost wound up in the local Emergency Room!


19 posted on 03/04/2010 3:04:44 PM PST by july4thfreedomfoundation ("And when the Antichrist comes, millions will love him.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: OldDeckHand

Stupid first-years.


20 posted on 03/04/2010 3:04:55 PM PST by AuH2ORepublican (If a politician won't protect innocent babies, what makes you think that he'll protect your rights?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: OldDeckHand

To which Dan Rather was seen running about, wearing only his bathrobe, and screaming, “Fake, but accurate! Fake, but accurate!”


23 posted on 03/04/2010 3:07:45 PM PST by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: OldDeckHand

The professor was attempting to teach a lesson on rumors and reliable sources to his first year law class, i.e., just because you heard it from what you consider to be a reliable source doesn’t mean it is accurate, so check it out before you run with it.

Looks like he succeeded in spades! If they didn’t learn from this, they will never learn. Perhaps the professor learned his own lesson as well!


26 posted on 03/04/2010 3:09:06 PM PST by LucyJo (http://www.housetohouse.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: OldDeckHand

I think he’s a good professor who’d like his students to think. He is, however, guilty of (1) underestimating the technology used by his students, and (2) overestimating his students’ ability to sort out facts.


27 posted on 03/04/2010 3:09:54 PM PST by paudio (Are you better off today than in 2006, when the Democrats took over the Congress?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: OldDeckHand

I was sure he was going to elope with Justice Ginsburg and run off to a remote South Pacific island.


31 posted on 03/04/2010 3:12:35 PM PST by Random Access
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: P-Marlowe; blue-duncan; wmfights; Forest Keeper; OldDeckHand

Since this is not true and can not be rationally explained as a mistake, then one must wonder if this was not some kind of trial balloon.

1. A threat to the Chief Justice

2. Groundwork for the media to discuss the NATURE of this court and the need for Obama to pack it. Which would lead to —>

3. An attempt to refire the leftist base regarding Obama’s great value to them

4. If challenged in court, there are a number of constitutional weaknesses in the HealthCare Bill that would eventually work their way to SCOTUS. This could be the beginning of that battle.


36 posted on 03/04/2010 3:15:46 PM PST by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Those who support our troops pray for their victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson