Posted on 08/03/2009 2:12:53 PM PDT by Calpernia
There are now modified photos of the COLB that broke here yesterday. The changes are so slight, that no one is noticing them.
The original one posted in breaking news:
One of the modified ones:
The changes are so subtle, you can barely tell which one you are looking at.
This modified one is showing jokes like: The Font of the Certificate=Schmutz (A Schmutz is a chump, as in you are a chump) #5733=The number of the Certificate, is code for : "Problem with Windows REGISTRY", a sly reference to your claim that Obama does not appear on the Hawaii Live Birth Registry. 47O44=Easiest of all. BOH's age=47 0=O (if you look close you can tell that that is a Schmutz Font "Oh" not "Zero") EF Lavender is ORGANIC DISH SOAP
The original one does not say EF Lavender, it says KF Lavender. The original one shows the number is: 47,644.
Humor of the Day
“Not to be insulting, but I find the whole Obama birth thing to be about as sensible as the 9/11 conspiracy thing.”
Ah but you are insulting and you know it! Do you have any idea what it is you just said? I would ask you to explain the relevance the two subjects have in common, but since there is no relevance between them, I won’t. The fact that you related these two subjects here is speaking volumes about you.
You clearly couldn’t care less about the Constitution. Are you a US citizen? Or are you just really into sausages...
Have you managed to succeed - since before Obummer was ‘elected’ - in NOT noticing that every vital record that a human accumulates over the course of a lifetime has been hidden from all eyes by this one individual?
Have you truly not noticed? What is your mental capacity that causes this fact to be senseless in your view?
Lets say you owned a.....sausage store...and wanted to hire a worker to say.....pack sausage....wouldn’t you want to know even a single vital piece of information about the person who’d be behind your counter keeping your sausage straight and organized? Of course you would!
But no, we have an individual who has taken the initiative with forethought - to HIDE every piece of vital historic fact about his life, which in itself is 100 percent deceitful, then proceeds in his deceit to attempt to undermine the Constitution KNOWING the requirements for running for the office of the President, then actually achieves his goal in deceit, in the face of the very voters who got him there, but you find it senseless!
I’m wasting my time with you. You know this. You just like to stir crap up because you voted for the deceiver. The fact that Oboy the Kenyan willingly hides his ENTIRE IDENTITY FROM THE WORLD should tell you something, but clearly it does not. Nevermind what is proveable and where he was born (temporarily). Just give ten seconds thought to the fact the he HAS indeed hidden his history from the world. Not to mention the dozens of SS card numbers he has used through the years.....
I wonder if you care...
The Kenyan doc is a fake.
I know that is his screenshot. I used his because I was too lazy to convert my bmp. Would have caused less of a red herring in fight if I used mine. But I don’t even know why he wants to participate in any ownership of this forgery. ::shrugs::
Wow, I leave for a day and look what happens. So, anyone track down K.F. Lavender? Any word on Orly’s trip to London?
Agreed. I said the first day it looks like a 50's Royal model.
Would someone please give me the Cliff Notes version of this. I spent the entire day on the first 6000 post thread, was absent a day, and came back now this. Yeah, I know, fixin' to get flamed for asking.
(excerpt)
Kenya was part of the British Empire in 1961, and as such, used English Common Law for any type of records and registration.
Australia joined the British Commonwealth of Nations in December, 1931 (see Wikipedia nation members’ list) and also uses English Common Law.
So, i’ve (blogger at Defend Our Freedoms Blog)established that both countries use English Common Law. One country, Kenya, when it was part of the British empire in 1961, and the other country, Australia, after it joined the Commonwealth of Nations (and was formly part of the British empire).
Because both countries use English Common Law (or did as members of the Commonwealth and British Empire), they were subject to the provisions of the English Common Law of Births and Deaths Registration Act 1953.
(end of excerpt)
The bind that makes them nearly identical: British Common Law (albeit the Seal, Deputy Registrar, and Commonwealth Symbol)
IIRC, along about middle of the afternoon on the original big thread of a couple days ago, someone posted an airline schedule.
Yes, where Ann was before the birth is the $64K question. A month after the birth, there was a get together of some of O. Sr.’s Hawaiian college friends (maybe to start the new semester?) and they had no idea a baby was on the way.
Never mind. I figured out the Cliff Notes. This thread is basically a non issue and was caused by confussion.
Thank you. I truly didn’t know that. And you are right — as a college student I avoided Elite whenever possible! When I posted yesterday, I just knew that the typed letters on the Kenyan document look both familiar and authentic to these old eyes.
(I never want to see another sheet of carbon paper.)
That's a weak dodge. If you're going to impugn someone's character in public, you do it to their face.
He may very well have done that. He may have also been "encouraged" to affirm that the online version is real.
It doesn’t appear that Orly will be getting any assistance from the government of Kenya. They are firmly in the debunkers’ camp. They are adamant that Barack Obama Senior was not in Kenya in 1961.
http://washingtonindependent.com/53654/forged-kenyan-document-splinters-birther-movement
I commend you for your admirable efforts to debunk the mis-perception that you yourself created.
I for one, have accepted your explanation. Thanks.
I’ve checked the K copy that I downloaded, and it was done some 30 minutes or so after you posted your image to this site.
I also recall having first tried to download the image from SCRIBD, but that site wanted me to register. I didn’t want to do that, so I came back to FR and downloaded the image from the thread.
I obviously snagged the one you created.
Come over and cut my grass and change my oil and you got a deal.
As far as can be told, she registered in person at UW. Additionally, there is no indication that her courses were extension courses. UW has confirmed that they were NIGHT courses. Finally, there are many contemporaneous recollections by her high school friends of coming to Seattle with a newborn child (and being unaware of how to take care of it) in August and babysitting it later (in the February to March period)
Corsi documents all of this on his latest WND article. I have also read this information in several different sources on the Internet over the past year our so. I think the betting money is on her being in Seattle at least from August to March.
Why? Because it is the truth. I, like most Freepers, believe the truth is important in any issue. You don't the truth. You prefer it to be some massive conspiracy. It isn't. It is just people seeing something that plain and simple is not there. Use Occam's Razor, the simplest explanation is usually the right one. I have provided you with the simple explanation... I can reproduce it, easily. YOU want to believe there are Machiavellian plotters in the wood work.
I did not create this mess, although I did make the image; you made the mess by mis-interpreting an image. Give it up and admit you are wrong.
Machiavellian plots? Truth? What in the hell are you talking about? The k version or e version, which ever you want is a forgery. I did not make them. The certificate with the k was the first draft to the one that got filed in PACER. You want plots or conspiracies, go look to the creators of the docs. Not me.
Calpernia and a few other Freepers have gotten all exercised because a JPEG image of the Kenyan BC I created has a blurry letter in "?,F. Lavemder" on the image.
The original, as I have been trying to tell them, is ABSOLUTELY an "E" but they see (read WANT to see), a "K," and therefor want to believe a conspiracy.
I have demonstrated that the "K" is merely an artifact of conversion of a higher quality, large image (860K PNG)to a lower quality, small image (87K JPG). I can do it again, over and over, and have. Other Freepers have tested it and gotten the exact same results... the "E" turns into blurry "K" after conversion. But those who want a conspiracy continue to beat this dead horse... to over 2000 postings worth.
I have described what and how it was done, provided exact examples, but still they persist in their obstinate insistence, despite all evidence to the contrary, that "someone" snuck onto Orly's site and CHANGED them. documents.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.