Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is this really it? (re: possible Obama's Kenyan B.C. - Attny Taitz) Click on the link
orlytaitzesq.com ^ | 8/2/2009 | rxsid

Posted on 08/02/2009 1:35:53 AM PDT by rxsid

Edited on 08/06/2009 12:10:02 AM PDT by John Robinson. [history]

Attorney Taitz filed a NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Expedite authentication, MOTION for Issuance of Letters Rogatory for authenticity of Kenyan birth certificate filed by Plaintiff Alan Keyes PhD.

Barry's Kenyan B.C.??

Special Motion for leave

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/blog1/ (site has been the target of hackers, proceed with caution — John)


TOPICS: Heated Discussion
KEYWORDS: armedcitizen; article2section1; awgeez; banglist; barackhusseinobama; barackobama; barackobamasr; bc; believeanything; betrayed; bfrcolbtwawlol; bho; bho44; birthcertificate; birther; birthers; birthplace; ccw; certifigate; changeamerica; citizenship; colb; commonlaw; conman; constitution; democratssuck; devilspawn; donofrio; dreams; dreamscopyright; dreamsfrommyfather; emerdevattel; emerichdevattel; englishcommonlaw; enoughofthiscrap; fakenews; fauxbama; founders; framers; fraud; georgewashington; gottrolls; greatpretender; hailtothekenyan; hawaii; headinthesand; hermaphrodite; hoax; honolulu; honoluluflimflam; hopespringseternal; hussein; imom; indonesia; johnjay; kenya; kenyabelieveit; kenyaman; kenyan; keyes; leodonofrio; lgfequalsdailykos; lgfhateschristians; lgfracist; lorettafuddy; lucyhazfootball; m0mbasa; marxistusurper; mas; mikeshusband; muslim; naturalborn; naturallaw; nbc; nothingburger; obama; obamabio; obamanoncitizenissue; obroma; ods; openyoureyes; orly; orlytaitz; orlytaitzpatriot; philberg; polarik; potusbogus; prezzot; qanoncrowd; repository1; rkba; rosemarysbaby; stalinistusurper; suckers; taitz; texasdarlin; thekenyan; thistimeforsure; tinfoilhat; trump; ukc; unpresident; usurper; vattel; vips; wakeup; washington; zulu666
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 6,401-6,4206,421-6,4406,441-6,460 ... 12,621-12,640 next last
To: Bikkuri
Easy, whoever did it was smart to make it, print it out and scan it again maybe?
I could be wrong, but it makes perfect sense..

吃驚さん、my point is that A4 size paper seems anachronistic: I don't believe that a 1964 Australian government document, as the Bomford original purports to be, would have been printed on A4 paper. I don't think Australia adopted the use of A4 paper until the 1970s.

6,421 posted on 08/04/2009 4:55:56 PM PDT by snowsislander (NRA -- join today! 1-877-NRA-2000)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6416 | View Replies]

To: autumnraine; Windflier
Just have to put my 2 pennies in.

I lived in Hawaii for 4 years. When my father was transfered we moved to N.J. I was in the 6th grade. I had a deep dark tan. The first day of school I came home and told my Mom that the kids at school thought I was black. This despite the fact that I had very sun bleached blond hair and very blue eyes.

6,422 posted on 08/04/2009 4:56:23 PM PDT by Red_Devil 232 (VietVet - USMC All Ready On The Right? All Ready On The Left? All Ready On The Firing Line!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6353 | View Replies]

To: gandalftb

Obama didn’t contest the divorce, I think some letter was sent to him about it and he never picked up the letter. But the lawyer didn’t know what Obama was going to do, so to be safe, he figured he might as well get the kids BC.

It’s starting to look like theres a Kenyan BC, but that doesn’t mean that there isn’t a Hawaiian BC, which Obamas grandma would have enabled by forging Obamas mom’s name on a form.

Assuming that, why did Obamas moms lawyer ask for the kenyan bc instead of the hawaiian bc? Maybe Obamas mom didn’t know about the hawaiian bc at that point, maybe the grandma just went and sent in the form on her own?


6,423 posted on 08/04/2009 4:57:01 PM PDT by truthfreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6404 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

I agree...the things one learns on FR! Incredible...


6,424 posted on 08/04/2009 4:58:48 PM PDT by Fred Nerks (fair dinkum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6390 | View Replies]

To: Las Vegas Ron




Awesome bit of work! How do you decipher what date a given image was uploaded to the server though? Is Miriam Mata an employee at the hosting company?






I can't take the credit, I forgot to mention Corazon for that info..
6,425 posted on 08/04/2009 5:00:17 PM PDT by Bikkuri
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6396 | View Replies]

To: Bikkuri; LucyT

I think this needs a ping, LucyT!

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2306351/posts?page=6372#6372


6,426 posted on 08/04/2009 5:01:20 PM PDT by Fred Nerks (fair dinkum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6420 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN

“It was found—according to the person who sent the e-mail to Texas Darli’—on microfiche”

Thanks for the information, I had thought it might be microfilm because that is what I normally find in the libraries I have frequented.... but do find microfiche on occasion.

My point was that, with the specialized equipment required, it doesn’t seem very feasible that someone would alter copies and place them in libraries. It would be difficult to determine which libraries to place the altered copies in and even more difficult to place enough copies to make it unlikely that someone would choose a library with an unaltered copy.

It is more likely that someone would produce a fake copy and then do a “song and dance” about it. This is probably what was done... unless it IS authentic. Therefore someone choosing a library, at random, would be likely to find an authentic copy, thus exposing the hoax.

Heck I wasn’t even sure how microfiche copies were made, did know it was a 4” X 5” film format. Couldn’t find much information on the Internet (quick search) but did figure out the most likely method.

Seem likely that the records would be copied on 16 mm film and then a 4” X 5” “contact sheet” of these negatives would be used for the microfiche. The math also, assuming lost space for borders. works.


6,427 posted on 08/04/2009 5:01:22 PM PDT by Peter Horry (Never were abilities so much below mediocrity so well rewarded - John Randolph)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6275 | View Replies]

To: woofie; conservativegramma

BTW, conservativegramma brought that to the table.. Man, need sleep, but can’t stop.. sorry grammy


6,428 posted on 08/04/2009 5:02:43 PM PDT by Bikkuri
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6345 | View Replies]

To: gandalftb

A) The reason for a birth certificate being necessary is because she would have to show proof she was his MOTHER and that Obama was recognized as his FATHER. I had to submit birth certificates for my children in my divorce or I could get a divorce decree made out to whatever. Not to mention he was named after his father, if his father chose to take him back to Kenya, who would stop him without a custody order (given in the divorce). It’s silly to think there is no reason to need a birth certificate in a divorce before there was a thing called “no fault divorce”. How was she to know he wouldn’t answer the summons for the divorce? And who would be stupid enough to take that chance?

B) Airplanes to Africa were for the very very wealthy. Ship passage seemed to be a more common way to go back then. If she got stranded out there in labor, wouldn’t it make sense she would be near a PORT? Mombasa is THE port for Kenya.

C)Mombasa was not a ‘part’ of Zanzibar. Zanzibar held the deed on the land, but it had been leased FOR the state of Kenya for 75 years. If you rent an apartment, are you not able to use that as your address? Of course you are, same as Kenya used Mombasa as THEIR domain because it was PAID to be their domain.

So it’s not quite so cut and dry, is it?


6,429 posted on 08/04/2009 5:03:59 PM PDT by autumnraine (You can't fix stupid, but you can vote it out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6404 | View Replies]

To: Kevmo

Nice post.


6,430 posted on 08/04/2009 5:04:46 PM PDT by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6309 | View Replies]

To: gandalftb

You have a lot of reading to do.

Better start now before there is more to read.


6,431 posted on 08/04/2009 5:04:50 PM PDT by little jeremiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6404 | View Replies]

To: John Valentine

I think that anyone who works with graphics would notice that the Kenyan document, as presented, shows serious signs of being fiddled with...

The pixels around the lettering are a bit of a tip-off.

Then again the obots will insist that the Hawaii document presented online is genuine even though it has the same pixel effect around it’s lettering.

The Australian one has some of the same effect, though it is much more hidden. As presented, I think both images (Kenyan vs Australian) are tampered.

The reasons for the fraudulent Australian document are obvious.

Perhaps the Kenyan Document I am witnessing is a result of o-bot tampering... Or ... Maybe Taitz and co are smarter than the obots could ever imagine. They may know exactly what they are doing.

I hope so.


6,432 posted on 08/04/2009 5:04:53 PM PDT by arKangel01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6388 | View Replies]

To: gandalftb

See 6429


6,433 posted on 08/04/2009 5:04:54 PM PDT by autumnraine (You can't fix stupid, but you can vote it out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6410 | View Replies]

To: gandalftb

All of the nonsense that you bring up has been well answered.

Go read, and don’t bug us anymoree!


6,434 posted on 08/04/2009 5:05:57 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (The beginning of the O'Bummer administration looks a lot like the end of the Nixon administration)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6404 | View Replies]

To: autumnraine; FreeAlaska32

Oooppps, posted wrong years, sorry, I’m tired.

4. December 24, 1952 to November 13, 1986
If at the time of your birth both your parents were U.S. citizens and at least one had a prior residence in the United States, you automatically acquired U.S. citizenship with no conditions for retaining it.

If only one parent was a U.S. citizen at the time of your birth, that parent must have resided in the United States for at least ten years, at least five of which had to be after the age of 16. There are no conditions placed on retaining this type of citizenship. If your one U.S. citizen parent is your father and you were born outside of marriage, the same rules apply if your father legally legitimated you before your 21st birthday and you were unmarried at the time. If legitimization occurred after November 14, 1986, your father must have established paternity prior to your 18th birthday, either by acknowledgment or by court order, and must have stated in writing that he would support you financially until your 18th birthday.


6,435 posted on 08/04/2009 5:06:31 PM PDT by autumnraine (You can't fix stupid, but you can vote it out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6415 | View Replies]

To: Red_Devil 232

From Hawaii to New Jersey? Did that suck?


6,436 posted on 08/04/2009 5:07:34 PM PDT by autumnraine (You can't fix stupid, but you can vote it out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6422 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah
"You have a lot of reading to do. Better start now before there is more to read."

now THAT'S funny
6,437 posted on 08/04/2009 5:07:51 PM PDT by razbinn (I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America,and to the republic for which it ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6431 | View Replies]

To: rxsid

How come it’s sealed and notarized in 1964???


6,438 posted on 08/04/2009 5:08:15 PM PDT by Redbob (W.W.J.B.D.: "What Would Jack Bauer Do?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: arKangel01
Try me on this. If someone is going to go to all the trouble to shop a picture with a table cloth in it why not print the document out on a VERY good color laser printer and then take a picture? WOW all the spooge is gone. I have seen analysis on other sites that think the pixelation was caused by the camera “clearing up” the area.
6,439 posted on 08/04/2009 5:08:41 PM PDT by mad_as_he$$ (Nemo me impune lacessit The law will be followed, dammit!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6432 | View Replies]

To: autumnraine
Let me know what you think!

Think? My brain shut down yesterday...I just cannot get past the fact that the same problems apply to the little 'l' for a 'one' on both the divorce document and the 'kenyan' BC.

Something is telling me they were both typed at the same time.

when it comes to idetifying fonts, I might as well be blind.

6,440 posted on 08/04/2009 5:09:47 PM PDT by Fred Nerks (fair dinkum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6418 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 6,401-6,4206,421-6,4406,441-6,460 ... 12,621-12,640 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson