Posted on 08/02/2009 1:35:53 AM PDT by rxsid
Edited on 08/06/2009 12:10:02 AM PDT by John Robinson. [history]
Attorney Taitz filed a NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Expedite authentication, MOTION for Issuance of Letters Rogatory for authenticity of Kenyan birth certificate filed by Plaintiff Alan Keyes PhD.
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/blog1/ (site has been the target of hackers, proceed with caution — John)
Why insinuate without support? Why not enlighten us with your superior knowledge and wisdom?
Quick, someone check the Aug. ‘61 sign in register at the Nyali Beach Hotel in Mombasa. ;)
Handcuffs, what an idea!
I think I just felt a tingle go up my leg!
Her filing makes her position clear.
Yes, grandmother claims to have been present when Hussein was born in Kenya.
"IF" the document is proven true then this issue explodes on ALL forms of media. This story changes from "a bunch of kooks known as Birthers" into "the biggest con job in the history of U.S. politics". Watergate will have nothing on this. There's no way that the State Run Media can keep this story under wraps.
Lawsuits will mount, Talk Radio will call for zero to step down, members of the military will follow Major Cook in droves in not following orders. Foreign newspapers will print stories stating that the administration is a fraud thus rendering all decisions that they make are void.
The weight on Stretch Pelosi to stop obstructing and impeach will be too much for her to bear.
LOL, just thought of that line in Top Gun..."I don't know but it's looking pretty good so far"
“What do you want to bet that Obama got registered in Hawaii under the LATE clause, as an Amended certificate of birth. Want to bet that year was 1964?”
Then how do you explain the contemporaneous birth announcements in the two Hawaiian newspapers at the time of Obama’s birth (one was on the Honolulu Advertiser August 13, 1961 on page B-6)? These announcements were the result of routine postings by Hawaiian Department of Health officials and not private individuals. Supposedly this was on multiple microfilms of the newspapers in libraries all over Hawaii well before the Nov 2008 elections.
Everyone please be VERY VERY VERY careful here. This Kenyan certificate smells real funny and many will be made to look foolish later if it is discredited!!
For starters....
ACORN gives back our $2B
And all those busted clunkers need to be returned WITH WORKING ENGINES.
Geezz when you are posting something like this can you at least specify that yu are talking about one of the other documents that have been floating about and not the one we are discussing in this thread?
Book Forty-four B,
Our Forty-fourth president.
The fraud is exposed.
I second that request. I’m not aware of any provision for this in The Constitution.
Paging Mike Isikoff. Investigative journalism needed STAT.
I do nor think this is legit. The fonts at the bottom are too modern, and the overall black-ink printing quality too high. Not a 1964 vintage docuament, imo.
Meet the fierce blond behind the Obama eligibility lawsuits:
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?pageId=94377
Ok, but it's important to know what era (or years) this blank Kenyan bc is from. Could be a recent version.
Yep. Joseph Farah has alot of connections at the CIA,military, etc. too. Obama’s brownshirts probably got wind that the other shoe was about to drop and decided to get the media doing their bidding before it was made public. A little brownshirt ‘Axelturfing’.
The impeachment of Bill Clinton teaches us that the barometer whether or not a president will be removed has not to do with the justice of the cause but with the president's approval ratings and that in turn has a lot to do with the state of the economy.
I am not as clairvoyant as you are, I do not know what the military will do much less the people who might or might not take to the streets, I only know that we have recent history of the impeachment of Bill Clinton to instruct us and the lessons seem to run the other way.
You state the question: "If it is clearly found that Obama is ineligible". But there is the rub, who is going to find ineligibility? Such a finding cannot come out of the air, it cannot be rendered here on Free Republic, the military -that would be the most dangerous of all, if it is to be done it must be done by a court, the Congress, or simply the moral weight of public opinion. In other words, you had Judge Sirica pushing Watergate. You have Sam Irwin's committee pushing Watergate. You had the Washington Post and the rest of the press pushing Watergate. There is simply no institution available to us except Free Republic and a few stalwart patriots who will press the issue and we have not the power to force the evidence open. The problem is who? In my previous post I stated what I thought it would not be the Congress and not be the courts. That leaves you with my.
................................
You're quite right, the situation is unprecedented so one man's opinion is almost as good as another except when it conflicts with explicit clauses of the Constitution.
It seems to me that whatever way we find out of such a crisis, certainly the one way we do not want to go is to remove the president by vigilante. The Constitution provides a method for the removal of a president. Obama may be a fraud but he is the president. If every time we had a dissident group declaring that the court and the Congress have defaulted on their responsibilities to remove the president who is a fraud and therefore illegitimate, ab initio, so they will go ahead themselves and remove him, you have at best vigilante-ism and at worst anarchy.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.