Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bombshell: Orders revoked for soldier challenging prez
Drudge Report, WorldNetDaily ^ | 7/15/09 | Chelsea Schilling and Joe Kovacs

Posted on 07/15/2009 5:37:44 AM PDT by buggy02

A U.S. Army Reserve major from Florida scheduled to report for deployment to Afghanistan within days has had his military orders revoked after arguing he should not be required to serve under a president who has not proven his eligibility for office. His attorney, Orly Taitz, confirmed to WND the military has rescinded his impending deployment orders. "We won! We won before we even arrived," she said with excitement. "It means that the military has nothing to show for Obama. It means that the military has directly responded by saying Obama is illegitimate – and they cannot fight it. Therefore, they are revoking the order!" She continued, "They just said, 'Order revoked.' No explanation. No reasons – just revoked."

(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News
KEYWORDS: article2section1; barackobama; bho2009; bho44; bhodod; birthcertificate; birthers; british; certifigate; citizenship; colb; constitution; cook; eligibility; federalcourt; forgery; indonesia; ineligible; kenya; majorvictory; military; naturalborn; naturalborncitizen; obama; obamanoncitizenissue; obamatruthfile; occidentalcollege; ordersrevoked; orly; orlytaitz; passports; rightwingnuts; stefancook; taitz; usurper; wingnutdaily
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 441-453 next last
To: Danae

The democrat party is using a subtle form of extortion ... once they get more dependents upon the federal dole (and gov’t run healthcare is precisely a ‘tax and dole’), when the laws signed into action are nullified by the ineligibility of the pres__ent, the demcs expect the cowardly Republicans to be too intimidated by the dole recipients to change the laws substantially so they will be passed through under the interim president.


221 posted on 07/15/2009 9:21:36 AM PDT by MHGinTN (Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 217 | View Replies]

To: deannadurbin

I can see the WND Articles just fine.


222 posted on 07/15/2009 9:22:02 AM PDT by Danae (Conservative does not equal Republican. Conservative does not compromise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 210 | View Replies]

To: buggy02; newgeezer
This is way bigger than I allowed myself to hope!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Now I'm really hoping for change.

223 posted on 07/15/2009 9:22:52 AM PDT by DungeonMaster (I can reach across the aisle without even using my sights.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: getmeouttaPalmBeachCounty_FL

The post of the year...Thank you and thank your husband!


224 posted on 07/15/2009 9:24:01 AM PDT by sissyjane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 209 | View Replies]

To: DieHard the Hunter

“If it were Cricket, the game would be replayed.”

Sounds like fun to me! And this time we wouldn’t have John McCain either! Oh what fun that would be!! :)


225 posted on 07/15/2009 9:24:30 AM PDT by seekthetruth ("See You In DC From 9/11 - 9/13 At Our National Freeper Tea Party Convention!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies]

To: rubeng

He is not trying to avoid deployment, he is trying to determine eligibility


226 posted on 07/15/2009 9:25:08 AM PDT by Ratman83
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies]

To: Danae

The left has crashed it. All the other pages on WND work fine except for this one.


227 posted on 07/15/2009 9:30:11 AM PDT by deannadurbin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 222 | View Replies]

To: Danae

> Have you noticed just how HARD the Dims are trying to shove their agenda through. It makes you think, DC knows what Obama’s problem is, and knows that the timer has started ticking down. What I don’t get is this: Anything the Usurper signs is illegal... so why bother?

WOW! Crikey, you have just made me have a really, really ugly, disturbing thought...

There is the small matter of some $3 Trillions of dollars of “stimulus money”. That’s alot of money even in George Soros’ books. Alot of money. Lots...

...what if the answer to your “why bother?” question is nothing more complicated than a good ol’ fashioned CHICAGOLAND SWINDLE?

$3 Trillion dollars makes alot of things “worth it” for some people. So what if every law, every ordinance, every bill, every word that he has said somehow gets invalidated.

The money has been spent, and it would be next to impossible to un-spend it. And those who have received it will disappear it as quick as they can, if they know what they are doing...

...just an ugly thought. ‘Strewth, I wish that one hadn’t occurred to me.


228 posted on 07/15/2009 9:30:46 AM PDT by DieHard the Hunter (Is mise an ceann-cinnidh. Cha ghéill mi do dhuine. Fàg am bealach.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 217 | View Replies]

To: DieHard the Hunter

We did not want to take the boat trip to do it.


229 posted on 07/15/2009 9:32:08 AM PDT by Ratman83
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 200 | View Replies]

To: Ratman83

LOL! Excellent answer! A+


230 posted on 07/15/2009 9:32:55 AM PDT by DieHard the Hunter (Is mise an ceann-cinnidh. Cha ghéill mi do dhuine. Fàg am bealach.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 229 | View Replies]

To: buggy02

I just read this posted on another forum, speculating from a former mil man:

“They cannot court-martial him if the order has been rescinded. They would charge him under Article 92, Failure to Obey a Lawful Order and they could throw in Article 88, Contempt Toward Officials. The order has to be in effect for the elements of Article 92 to be provable in court.

By revoking the order they pulled their tail in and ran the other way.

Zero doesn’t want a court-martial becasue the government would have to disclose the President’s long form birth certificate in discovery to prove the President is the lawful CIC.”

Any freeper provide validity to it?


231 posted on 07/15/2009 9:35:42 AM PDT by fightinbluhen51 ("MOLON LABE")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Roccus

Thank you very much. I still can’t access the WorldNetDaily page but thanks to you, I can find the information elsewhere.


232 posted on 07/15/2009 9:39:32 AM PDT by Thirteen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 220 | View Replies]

To: sam_paine

Those of us who respect the Constitution understand the concept of separation of powers and realize that even applies to a rotten lying usurping crypto Marxist bastard like Hussein. Accordingly we do not want any judicial power to attempt to remove him from office. We want discovery of the documents so that we might present them to the appropriate congressional authority to have him removed from office through the impeachment process.

If Congress will not do its duty after being shown by a preponderance of the evidence (this is a political/ civil matter after all) or beyond a reasonable doubt, then we will know what to do next.


233 posted on 07/15/2009 9:40:27 AM PDT by DMZFrank
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: sam_paine

Those of us who respect the Constitution understand the concept of separation of powers and realize that even applies to a rotten lying usurping crypto Marxist bastard like Hussein. Accordingly we do not want any judicial power to attempt to remove him from office. We want discovery of the documents so that we might present them to the appropriate congressional authority to have him removed from office through the impeachment process.

If Congress will not do its duty after being shown by a preponderance of the evidence (this is a political/ civil matter after all) or beyond a reasonable doubt, then we will know what to do next.


234 posted on 07/15/2009 9:40:33 AM PDT by DMZFrank
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: DieHard the Hunter

Why would it not invalidate the entire election?

My read is that it would invalidate the election and with Bush having served two terms already, Dick Cheney would be sworn in and a new election held.


235 posted on 07/15/2009 9:43:46 AM PDT by W. W. SMITH (Only dead fish follow the "O")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies]

To: roaddog727

“Faciendum est” indeed.

Good work. May God bless you in all your endeavors.


236 posted on 07/15/2009 9:46:13 AM PDT by reagandemocrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: W. W. SMITH

> My read is that it would invalidate the election and with Bush having served two terms already, Dick Cheney would be sworn in and a new election held.

From a pure process point-of-view that would make an eminent amount of sense. It is clean and it is pure, and it can be justified without fancy argument. Go back to where the first foul occurred and restart the game.


237 posted on 07/15/2009 9:48:27 AM PDT by DieHard the Hunter (Is mise an ceann-cinnidh. Cha ghéill mi do dhuine. Fàg am bealach.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 235 | View Replies]

To: DieHard the Hunter
"... Dick Cheney would be sworn in and a new election held."

I don't think God would be that merciful to this nation.

238 posted on 07/15/2009 9:50:08 AM PDT by MHGinTN (Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 237 | View Replies]

To: fightinbluhen51

These are just my own thoughts, but I think there’s validity to what was mentioned on one of the threads late last night.

Orly is perhaps celebrating a win a bit too soon. To acknowledge that the deployment orders have been pulled — is this not the same question, just reversing of the official orders? In other words, regardless of whether the order is to deploy or not, the order comes down the same chain of command. The Major is more or less challenging the authority at the top of the chain; not the order itself.


239 posted on 07/15/2009 9:51:12 AM PDT by getmeouttaPalmBeachCounty_FL (****************************Stop Continental Drift**)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 231 | View Replies]

To: HairOfTheDog
There is a giant difference here, the person you refer basically argued that the war was illegal because (from wiki, yea, I know the source is not a valid source, however) " Professor of international law Francis Boyle testified that the war is illegal because it was not authorized by the U.N. Security Council, and claimed that Congress approved the war on the basis of faulty intelligence. "

Congress approved the war, yet his argument is that the UN should have authorized the war. Care to explain why you believe we should have supported Watada?

240 posted on 07/15/2009 9:54:12 AM PDT by Diplomat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 441-453 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson