I just read this posted on another forum, speculating from a former mil man:
“They cannot court-martial him if the order has been rescinded. They would charge him under Article 92, Failure to Obey a Lawful Order and they could throw in Article 88, Contempt Toward Officials. The order has to be in effect for the elements of Article 92 to be provable in court.
By revoking the order they pulled their tail in and ran the other way.
Zero doesn’t want a court-martial becasue the government would have to disclose the President’s long form birth certificate in discovery to prove the President is the lawful CIC.”
Any freeper provide validity to it?
These are just my own thoughts, but I think there’s validity to what was mentioned on one of the threads late last night.
Orly is perhaps celebrating a win a bit too soon. To acknowledge that the deployment orders have been pulled — is this not the same question, just reversing of the official orders? In other words, regardless of whether the order is to deploy or not, the order comes down the same chain of command. The Major is more or less challenging the authority at the top of the chain; not the order itself.