Posted on 03/03/2009 5:02:37 AM PST by publius1
You wouldn’t know it some days, but there are moderates in this country — moderate conservatives, moderate liberals, just plain moderates. We sympathize with a lot of the things that President Obama is trying to do. We like his investments in education and energy innovation. We support health care reform that expands coverage while reducing costs.
But the Obama budget is more than just the sum of its parts. There is, entailed in it, a promiscuous unwillingness to set priorities and accept trade-offs. There is evidence of a party swept up in its own revolutionary fervor — caught up in the self-flattering belief that history has called upon it to solve all problems at once.
So programs are piled on top of each other and we wind up with a gargantuan $3.6 trillion budget. We end up with deficits that, when considered realistically, are $1 trillion a year and stretch as far as the eye can see. We end up with an agenda that is unexceptional in its parts but that, when taken as a whole, represents a social-engineering experiment that is entirely new.
U.S. has never been a society riven by class resentment. Yet the Obama budget is predicated on a class divide. The president issued a read-my-lips pledge that no new burdens will fall on 95 percent of the American people. All the costs will be borne by the rich and all benefits redistributed downward....
The U.S. has traditionally had a relatively limited central government. But federal spending as a share of G.D.P. is zooming from its modern norm of 20 percent to an unacknowledged level somewhere far beyond.
Those of us who consider ourselves moderates — moderate-conservative, in my case — are forced to confront the reality that Barack Obama is not who we thought he was.
(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...
That's a big "if". Much more likely is that he was selected by the NY Slimes because he's a phony conservative who intentionally omits critical information about the far left.
More like “BO is not the person that we all made him into in our own desires”
That these “see-ers” could not grasp what so many others easily saw tells me a great deal about their lack of wisdom. It demostrates that these people merely run with the pack and fear breaching the groupthink that pervades the beltway and the corrupt MSM.
Hehe -- there is no such thing as "too stupid to have a regular column in a major publication," except for the expectation to generally use correct grammar, spelling, punctuation, etc. The substantive requirement is simple -- sell copy. Lie if that's what sells.
When it comes to FUBO, I treat the willfully ignorant (as the author is) the same as those who actively supported him BECAUSE he is a Marxist.
The information was there, they just chose to ignore it.
He’s exactly what I thought he was, however I’ll admit I didn’t think we’d bend over as quickly and as willingly as we have.
A bunch of naive drooling idiots.
Het Idiot Brooks: Obama may not be who YOU thought he was, but he is EXACTLY what WE tried to tell you he was
This is a statement I fully expect to hear from average rather non-political voters, not from a journalist who makes his living staying informed. Who is he trying to con?
Thinking ahead doesn’t seem to be a moderate trait.
Lol! THERE was the clue all along that he and his agenda stunk! His initials are B.O.! I never thought about that until now. I'm sure some of you did though.
Could David Brooks be any more insulting?
Another “moderate” get runover!
Love it, too bad we can’t change bears to obama.
As long as Conservatives continue to mock and disparage EVERYONE’s epiphanies that Zero is counter-productive to the country’s best interests, we will continue to sink in quicksand.
EVERY person who admits to any degree of buyer’s remorse, and questions what the Kenyan is doing, is a movement away from the Fraud and towards opposition, even when couched in language that doesnt embrace full-blown Conservatism.
Of course libtards who didnt know who he really was were out to lunch and sucked in by the propaganda machine- that’s the purpose of propaganda.
But when he writes:
“The first task will be to block the excesses of unchecked liberalism...It will be up to moderates to raise the alarms against these ideological outrages.”
we should be happy that some people out there are beginning to GET IT, to WHATEVER extent.
It is easy to see why Cons are not going to win elections when they continue to chastise everyone else who doesnt see things just exactly as they do.
For those who have forgotten: the enemy of my enemy is my friend.
And these are the smartest among us - sheesh.
Brooks must have finally taken a look at the dive his 401K has taken.
I would certainly LOVE to see the GOP wield the power that the democRats have arrogated to themselves. It wouldn’t change many minds on the left, though. In fact it would just affirm to them that the problem wasn’t with the centralized power, but just that the wrong people are in power.
FA Hayek warned SPECIFICALLY of this in Road to Serfdom. Collectivists think the road to Utopia is through central planning and centralized power. They set these central power institutions up, and tear down those that impede centralized power, then along comes Hitler.
It is a logical extension of their worldview that solutions without tradeoffs actually exist and are achievable with the right people with enough power.
The “short term” difficulties (like authoritarian rule and destruction of freedom, genocide, etc) are “worth it” because in the end, the “solution” will be perfect.
.. them libs, are peelin’ their cute little Zero bumper stickers off by the thousands..........where’s my axe handle?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.