Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judge Says University Can Deny Course Credit to Christian Graduates Taught With Creationism Texts
Fox News ^ | August 13, 2008

Posted on 08/13/2008 9:44:45 AM PDT by Sopater

A federal judge has ruled the University of California can deny course credit to Christian high school graduates who have been taught with textbooks that reject evolution and declare the Bible infallible, the San Francisco Chronicle reported.

U.S. District Judge James Otero of Los Angeles ruled Friday that the school's review committees did not discriminate against Christians because of religious viewpoints when it denied credit to those taught with certain religious textbooks, but instead made a legitimate claim that the texts failed to teach critical thinking and omitted important science and history topics.

Charles Robinson, the university's vice president for legal affairs, told the Chronicle that the ruling "confirms that UC may apply the same admissions standards to all students and to all high schools without regard to their religious affiliations."

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; Philosophy; US: California
KEYWORDS: academia; atheismandstate; christianschools; confesstothestate; creation; creationism; education; evolution; heresy; highereducation; homeschool; judiciary; publikskoolz; ruling; uc
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 781-794 next last
To: Sopater
I don't think it has to be translated as "navel"

It appears that we both agree that the bible cannot be taken literally since translations may be in error.

181 posted on 08/14/2008 8:24:04 AM PDT by ColdWater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies]

To: ColdWater
It appears that we both agree that the bible cannot be taken literally since translations may be in error.

I agree that there is always a risk of introducing errors when translating languages.
182 posted on 08/14/2008 8:29:19 AM PDT by Sopater (A wise man's heart inclines him to the right, but a fool's heart to the left. ~ Ecc 10:2 (NASB))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 181 | View Replies]

To: Sopater
I agree that there is always a risk of introducing errors when translating languages.

Risk? You posted an example of what you considered an actual error, not a 'risk'. Unless you retract your post, we both agree that there are translation errors in the bible and it cannot be taken literally.

183 posted on 08/14/2008 8:33:01 AM PDT by ColdWater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies]

To: js1138
The only assumption made by science is that that phenomena are not capricious.

You must have other assumptions, otherwise you could not say on the basis of that premise alone that creation science is a contradiction in terms.

Cordially,

184 posted on 08/14/2008 8:35:27 AM PDT by Diamond
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: poindexters brother
It came down to what I told my wife: “I just have a hard time giving my money to an organization that seems dedicated to subvert and/or ridicule most things I believe.

Our daughter begins her freshman year later this month at a well-regarded Christian University in Oregon. ( poindexters brother)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Poindexter and luckystarmom,

The University of California schools are heavily subsidized with taxpayer money.

Government money ( your money, pointdexter) is being used to promote an atheistic Secular Humanist religious worldview. **Your** money is being used to ridicule and subvert your religious beliefs.

Luckystarmom,...yes,...Parents and children are not forced to attend UC schools but they are forced to pay for them in their taxes.

Some of the problems that government schools have with the First Amendment are avoided in government colleges and universities because attendance is voluntary...but..taxpayers are still forced to pay for colleges and universities that can never be religiously neutral. Why? Because a religious neutral education is impossible.

( By the way, did I ever tell you that I love your screen name? It is so optimistic! )

185 posted on 08/14/2008 8:35:59 AM PDT by wintertime (Good ideas win! Why? Because people are NOT stupid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]

To: wintertime
Parents and children are not forced to attend UC schools but they are forced to pay for them in their taxes.

Parents and children are not forced to live in CA and pay California taxes.

186 posted on 08/14/2008 8:38:29 AM PDT by ColdWater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

To: NCLaw441; MrB
Fashion our economy such that you must have some sort of accreditation from an “approved” institution, preferably government sponsored, in order to earn a living. ( Mr.B.)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

NCLaw441,

Mr.B. is making a good point in his reply to you.

The Secular Humanists are not people of good will. They will pervert the credentialing that you suggest to disallow anything ( private and government) that does not have the Secular Humanist religious imprimatur.

This action by the UC Secular Humanists wasn't about credentialing courses. It was about destroying Christian education, manipulating Christian education, and pressuring Christians into bending to the will of Secular Humanism.

We see the same tactics used on the Catholic Church who can no longer offer adoption services because the Secular Humanists demand that they give babies to same sex couples.

There is the psychologist who was fired from his job with the Chicago police department because he was ( in the past) a former member of a fundamentalist Christian church that opposes homosexuality.

Christmas is now the “Winter Holiday”.

The action by UC against these Christian high schools in just one more dead canary in mine shaft. Sadly, Christians are asleep.

187 posted on 08/14/2008 8:48:49 AM PDT by wintertime (Good ideas win! Why? Because people are NOT stupid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies]

To: ColdWater

Parents and children are not forced to live in CA and pay California taxes.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Gee! So they move to another state. Where do they go when that state is taken over by the Secular Humanists?

Before long Christians will be living in catacombs.

The truth is that the Secular Humanists would **kill** Christians if the could. They just can’t get away with it...(yet). Yes, they really do hate Christians that much.


188 posted on 08/14/2008 8:51:29 AM PDT by wintertime (Good ideas win! Why? Because people are NOT stupid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies]

To: ColdWater

Parents and children are not forced to live in CA and pay California taxes.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

By the way, California is having a problem with a middle and upper class exodus of families.


189 posted on 08/14/2008 8:55:30 AM PDT by wintertime (Good ideas win! Why? Because people are NOT stupid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies]

To: wintertime
Gee! So they move to another state. Where do they go when that state is taken over by the Secular Humanists?

The meek shall inherit the earth. Seriously, if Christians make up the majority of the US population, why are the 'secular humanists' taking over?

190 posted on 08/14/2008 8:55:52 AM PDT by ColdWater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies]

To: wintertime
The truth is that the Secular Humanists would **kill** Christians if the could. They just can’t get away with it...(yet). Yes, they really do hate Christians that much.

Strong words. What do you base them on?

191 posted on 08/14/2008 9:02:42 AM PDT by ColdWater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies]

To: ColdWater
there are translation errors in the bible and it cannot be taken literally.

The conclusion is a self-refuting non-sequiter.

Logically, it would be impossible to tell the difference between a translation error and an accurate translation without assuming in the first place that the original had a literal meaning, i.e., a meaning that was intended, and could be interpreted in it's proper sense. Therefore, your conclusion violates the terms of the premise, and is incoherent.

In the second place, it simply does not follow that because some translations are in error that all translations are necessarily in error.

Cordially,

192 posted on 08/14/2008 9:10:39 AM PDT by Diamond
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies]

To: Diamond
In the second place, it simply does not follow that because some translations are in error that all translations are necessarily in error.

Agreed. There are translation errors in the Bible and thus it cannot be taken literally.

193 posted on 08/14/2008 9:18:12 AM PDT by ColdWater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies]

To: wintertime
The truth is that the Secular Humanists would **kill** Christians if the could. They just can’t get away with it...(yet). Yes, they really do hate Christians that much.

Are you really so badly warped that you believe nonsense like this?

You need to get out more.

194 posted on 08/14/2008 9:20:24 AM PDT by Coyoteman (Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies]

To: ColdWater
why are the ‘secular humanists’ taking over?
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Because Christians **wrongly** believe that since they are people of good will, that Secular Humanist are too.

Another reason is that Christians are like frogs in a pot of slowly warming water. They will cook there until it is too late.

There are now entire segments of our culture where it is likely very difficult or impossible for a Christian ( who was forthright about his belief) to get a job, or earn the credential or degree necessary for the job. These segments of the culture are now nearly totally beyond the influence of Christianity. ( Two of **many** examples: university professorships and many of the arts.)

Finally, Christians think government K-12 schools are like the school they knew when they were kids. WRONG!

Studies show that 85% of Christian children who have families active in their church will leave the religion within 2 years after high school. Worse, is that huge percentages of those kids who claim to be Christian hold Secular Humanist religious beliefs that utterly disqualify them from being considered Christian.

I fear that many of the people who call themselves “Christian” in the U.S. are not Christian at all! They are really Secular Humanist in their religious beliefs.

195 posted on 08/14/2008 9:20:51 AM PDT by wintertime (Good ideas win! Why? Because people are NOT stupid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 190 | View Replies]

To: ColdWater

Christians long ago dropped the idea of using the gov’t to influence the culture.

Secular Humanists have no such ethical problem. They’ve even gotten the government to essentially “establish” their religion as default, without being subject to the weapon of “separation” that they use against Christians.

Two court cases tell the tale: One says that SH is a religion for “free exercise” purposes, and the other says that SH is not a religion for “establishment” purposes.

In short, the SH’s have the guns of gov’t to back them up, and the Christians do not.


196 posted on 08/14/2008 9:23:32 AM PDT by MrB (You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't use reason to get into in the first place)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 190 | View Replies]

To: wintertime
Studies show that 85% of Christian children who have families active in their church will leave the religion within 2 years after high school.

How are you going to keep them down on the farm after they've seen...the farm?

197 posted on 08/14/2008 9:24:14 AM PDT by Coyoteman (Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies]

To: js1138
ca·pri·cious –adjective
1. subject to, led by, or indicative of caprice or whim; erratic: He's such a capricious boss I never know how he'll react.
2. Obsolete. fanciful or witty.


Sounds like random, unguided, non-intelegently designed evolution to me!
198 posted on 08/14/2008 9:31:56 AM PDT by cartoonistx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: wintertime
Studies show that 85% of Christian children who have families active in their church will leave the religion within 2 years after high school.

I hadn't heard that before. Why is that?

199 posted on 08/14/2008 9:40:46 AM PDT by ColdWater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies]

To: ColdWater
"

Your foolish claim that something is not in the Bible, when it plainly is.

200 posted on 08/14/2008 9:41:26 AM PDT by editor-surveyor (Jimmy Carter is the skidmark in the panties of American History)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 781-794 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson