Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Truth About High Fructose Corn Syrup - The Science Behind the Sweetener
QSR Magazine ^ | May 2008 | Blair Chancey

Posted on 05/12/2008 10:22:56 PM PDT by neverdem

Dr. John White is the founder & president of White Technical Research, a consulting firm serving the food and beverage industry for nearly 15 years. He has worked with high fructose corn syrup for more than 25 years, and his expertise has been quoted by numerous news outlets. Organizations such as the American Council on Science and Health in Washington, D.C., the Institute of Food Technologists in Atlanta, and most recently the Corn Refiners Association have turned to him and his expertise on the sweetener for answers. Now, QSR talks with him to set the record straight about the similarities and differences between sugar and the contested HFCS.

Can you explain how high fructose corn syrup (HFCS) was developed? What was on the market before its creation? We’re going back into the 1970s. At that time sucrose was the dominant sweetener. It has a composition that is half fructose and half glucose. Those are two monosaccharides. In sucrose there’s a bond between them. So sucrose is called a disaccharide, but in composition it is half fructose and half glucose.

The other dominant or common caloric sweetener was honey, and it has roughly the same composition but is mostly monosaccharides. So it’s about half fructose and half glucose and its monosaccharous, so there’s no bond between them. So those were the two common caloric sweeteners at the time.

There was a little bit of fruit juice concentrate that also happens to have the same composition, half fructose, half glucose, depending on the fruit that is being concentrated.

So how did HFCS come into the picture? The driving force was twofold for the development of HFCS. One was that it was not always easy to use sucrose in food applications where you had to dissolve the sugar to use it in...

(Excerpt) Read more at qsrmagazine.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: corn; cornsyrup; diabetes; fda; fructose; health; hfcs; medicine; nafld; sugar
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-102 next last
To: Cheryllynn
One Dorito, Frito or corn in any form gives me a migraine headache, I'll bet your husband is allergic to corn like I am.
81 posted on 05/13/2008 6:01:51 AM PDT by Ditter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: hellbender

The Costco in Woodburn Oregon carries the Coke you speak of. It tastes exactly like the Coke I used to drink as a kid.

Looks like I’m due for another trip to my buddy John’s place...


82 posted on 05/13/2008 6:04:30 AM PDT by Don W (To write with a broken pencil is pointless.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Don W
I think there is something more going on with HFCS than can be explained by chemistry. It's almost as if the body reacts to two tablespoons of the stuff as if you had actually eaten the twenty ears of corn needed to make it. Cane sugar doesn't seem to lead to the same drastic weight gain, though doubtless it would be better to give up all refined sugars.

You'll never convince an armchair chemist, but the results of mass HFCS consumption over the last three decades are hard to argue with.

83 posted on 05/13/2008 6:09:46 AM PDT by Mr. Jeeves ("One man's 'magic' is another man's engineering. 'Supernatural' is a null word." -- Robert Heinlein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Nathan Zachary
"If it says pure 100% maple syrup, then that’s what it should be. It costs about $12 a half pint."

That's very expensive syrup. I typically pay about $10-12 for a quart of pure maple syrup. When I'm in New England, it's readily available, and when I visit my family in Michigan I can sometimes find it at a roadside stand for even less. Here in PA, it's available at most grocery stores and Trader Joe's - no problem.

84 posted on 05/13/2008 6:48:34 AM PDT by Think free or die
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: matthew fuller

10,000 lbs. of corn is 178 bushels, which is about the average yield per acre for the heart of the corn belt.


85 posted on 05/13/2008 7:01:32 AM PDT by Mr. Lucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: SatinDoll

From Dr. Blaylock:

The worst diet is one high in N-6 fats, because it suppresses natural, cell mediated immunity while dramatically increasing inflammation. Americans eat 50 times the amount of these harmful fats as needed for health, mainly at the recommendation of the same government and medical geniuses who force vaccination programs on us.

Inflammation “boosters”

N-6 or omega-6 fats, including corn, safflower, sunflower, canola, peanut and soybean oils
high meat diets, which are high in iron and glutamate
soybean products
trans-fats
Inflammation “busters”

omega-3 oils (N-3 oils), found in fish and flaxseed
some white meats like chicken and turkey
a high intake of vegetables and some fruits
The following supplements help reduce inflammation:

curcumin
quercetin
hesperidin
ferulic acid
silymarin
magnesium
omega-3 (low EPA and high DHA)
vitamin C.
N-acetyl–L cysteine (NAC)
natural vitamin E (with high gammatocopherol)
Read more about the healthful effects of omega-3 oils in my special report “Omega-3: Nature’s Miracle Panacea” by going here.


86 posted on 05/13/2008 7:01:41 AM PDT by antisocial (Texas SCV - Deo Vindice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: KeyWest
There are just too many studies out on the health hazards of HFCS to promote it over sucrose.

yes.

My rule of thumb is: Is it man-made or nature-made?

High Fructose Corn Syrup sounds benign - sounds natural. It is not.

I use honey and maple syrup (my grandson just brought me a bottle he boiled down) - both are nature-made.

I use organic sugar -

another rule of thumb is: If I can't recognize or pronounce the ingredients, I don't eat it...

87 posted on 05/13/2008 7:19:14 AM PDT by maine-iac7 (Typical Gun-Toting, Jesus-Loving Gramma)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

I’ve often wondered if this is why so many under the age of 30 are so fat. (Pardon the expression). I wonder if many children balloon up because of the HFCS in everything.


88 posted on 05/13/2008 7:33:34 AM PDT by jps098
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SatinDoll

Me too. My wife used to suffer from MSG migraines, and now suffers from a painful condition brought on by additives with potassium. We read every label. At least she no longer suffers from the migraines since she found MSG Buster.


89 posted on 05/13/2008 7:36:52 AM PDT by jps098
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

bump. Thanks for posting.


90 posted on 05/13/2008 7:37:37 AM PDT by khnyny (Hillary is the national equivalent of Tracy Flick)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem; Coleus; AdmSmith; Berosus; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; Ernest_at_the_Beach; ...

Lowfat salad dressing is (and other lowfat products are) often loaded with HFCS. Thanks neverdem.


91 posted on 05/13/2008 9:14:12 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/_______________________Profile updated Monday, April 28, 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MoochPooch
I’m curious . . . what about maple syrup? What kind of sugar is that? (I just bought a bottle — had a crazving for pancakes.)

Maple syrup, concentrated from the sap of maple trees, is a uniquely American product. It takes from 30 to 40 gallons of sap (3% sucrose) to produce one gallon of syrup (65% sucrose), and is only produced for 4 to 6 weeks in the spring when the sap first begins to flow. Unless labeled "pure maple syrup", a product is likely to be mixed with corn syrup to cut expense.

You're free to search for other sources. It doesn't describe what the remaining 35% is. Water? Other sugars?

92 posted on 05/13/2008 9:45:03 AM PDT by neverdem (I'm praying for a Divine Intervention.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

thanks for the ping


93 posted on 05/13/2008 12:53:56 PM PDT by GOPJ (The "thug-way": Hillary won't drop out until Obama accepts her as VP - then the real horror starts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Like, thanks dude.

Private FReepmail coming.

Cheers!

94 posted on 05/13/2008 7:30:57 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nathan Zachary
"Then you'd be wrong. Two different types of corn are used for ethanol and human foods. "

I plead guilty to listening to media sources bemoaning the price increases of commodities worldwide and blaming the rise on corn being "diverted" to manufacture ethanol. I should have been more suspicious, however, it was very easy to agree that the environmentalists and politicians had cost us money again.

95 posted on 05/13/2008 10:19:02 PM PDT by matthew fuller (Alleged Rev./Marine Wright is BHO's "designated drunk" to hide Ayers/Dorhn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: matthew fuller
I plead guilty to listening to media sources bemoaning the price increases of commodities worldwide and blaming the rise on corn being "diverted" to manufacture ethanol. I should have been more suspicious, however, it was very easy to agree that the environmentalists and politicians had cost us money again.
It *is* part of the problem. The issue is arable land used, not necessarily using more of a certain type of crop. That's why American hops production is now virtually nonexistent. It's more profitable to produce corn thanks to ethanol subsidies.
96 posted on 05/13/2008 10:27:05 PM PDT by ketsu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

bookmark


97 posted on 05/14/2008 8:30:16 AM PDT by traviskicks (http://www.neoperspectives.com/Ron_Paul_2008.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mountainbunny

ping


98 posted on 05/18/2008 4:25:58 PM PDT by neverdem (I'm praying for a Divine Intervention.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VanShuyten

You are correct about the composition of sucrose. The problem with HFCS is that it does not generate the same metabolic response as sucrose. Leptin is part of the satiation response to sucrose/glucose. People will unconsciously consume more fructose than sucrose. The glucose is metabolized in all of the muscles and fructose must be metabolized in the liver (fat generating consequences).

Fructose also causes the absorption of extra iron in the gut. Iron is a major component in diabetes, heart disease and cancer.


99 posted on 05/19/2008 8:38:13 AM PDT by kruss3 (Kruss3@gmail.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Don W

Good luck with that... you want real sugar in your food anymore, you better make it yourself.

Especially when you want to talk soda/pop... there is only one company I know that uses 100% cane sugar to sweeten its product, and its a small regional outlet based in Natrona Heights, PA. There may be some others, but they are few and far between.

HFCS is in EVERYTHING... I can’t recall picking up and reading the label of ANYTHING sweet, that did not have this as an ingredient.


100 posted on 05/19/2008 8:46:00 AM PDT by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-102 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson