Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

If McCain wins the nomination, will you support him?
01.09.08 | perdogg

Posted on 01/09/2008 8:11:46 AM PST by Perdogg

1) Vote for McCain

2) Vote Dims - Kevorkian vote

3) Don't vote

4) Third party?


TOPICS: Politics/Elections; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: 2008; elections; marines; mccain; nh2008; vanity
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 621-640641-660661-680 ... 1,061-1,076 next last
To: cinives
you mean voting for a socialist with an R after his name is better than voting for a socialist with a D after their name ?

McCain is no socialist. Not even close with that one. I don't particularly care for him myself, but I know that much.

But let's for a moment suppose that he WAS. And, from that perspective, think about what you wrote above....

There's an old saying. You may have heard it:
"He may be a son-of-a-b*tch, but he's OUR son-of-a-b*tch."

I suggest you think about that a while.

- John

641 posted on 01/09/2008 11:37:26 AM PST by Fishrrman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 636 | View Replies]

To: cinives

If Hillary gets rid of one of the five FCC commissioners, and the replacement does her bidding in reinstating the fairness doctrine, what do you think anyone will be able to do about it? Sue her? Impeach her? No, she will have more power than you can ever believe. The Constitution and separation of powers will be turned on its head.


642 posted on 01/09/2008 11:38:17 AM PST by doug from upland (Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 638 | View Replies]

To: Chunga
Conservatives aren't generally so vulgar...and they aren't usually so clueless

Don't presume to lecture me on what conservatives do and don't, n00b. I've lectured better folks than you on the topic.

Conservatives ... don't enable the election of troop-hating, wealth-redistributing tax-hikers by voting for them when they have the temerity to run for President as Republicans.

Here's a hint for you: Stop talking

Way to go, Josef. And what if I don't shut up and sit down? Hmmmm? Is it off to the Gulag with me?

As a non-Republican

I really wish conclusion-jumping was an Olympic Sport. Really. You'd guarantee the USA a Gold Medal it.

643 posted on 01/09/2008 11:38:35 AM PST by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilisation is aborting, buggering, and contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 635 | View Replies]

To: EEDUDE

I wouldn’t expect McCain (or any of the other “top-tier” GOP candidates, for that matter) to nominate judges like Scalia and Thomas, but I wouldn’t expect them to nominate ultra-lib judges either. ....like Hillary or Obama undoubtedly would.


644 posted on 01/09/2008 11:38:46 AM PST by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 634 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

Absolutely NOT! - third party or write-in.

I haven’t yet given up on Fred getting the nomination.

I would vote for Romney, possibly Rudy but not likely. BTW, did you know Rudy was Mayor of New York City?


645 posted on 01/09/2008 11:38:56 AM PST by citizen (Capt. McQueeg: "Have any of you an explanation for the quart of missing strawberries?" [click-clack])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nodumbblonde

“Am I looking at this all wrong?”

No. You are not.

Those that say that we can get where we want to go by increments don’t seem to recognize that it works both ways.


646 posted on 01/09/2008 11:39:15 AM PST by EEDUDE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 367 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

Probably third party.


647 posted on 01/09/2008 11:39:56 AM PST by ksen ("For an omniscient and omnipotent God, there are no Plan B's" - Frumanchu)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

Are you going to keep running totals? :)


648 posted on 01/09/2008 11:40:50 AM PST by citizen (Capt. McQueeg: "Have any of you an explanation for the quart of missing strawberries?" [click-clack])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: citizen

I can. I cannot do it now.


649 posted on 01/09/2008 11:42:14 AM PST by Perdogg (Fred Thompson - John Bolton 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 648 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

Oh, what a “compasionate conservative” you are.

Seeing things in absolutes, us vs. them in my opinion is not the best approach. Not all things are black and white, not all conservatives are party line voting, ad Hominem spewing Republicans.


650 posted on 01/09/2008 11:43:21 AM PST by Pawtucket Patriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 628 | View Replies]

To: citizen
Same here.

Rudolph Giuliani was Mayor of New York? No kidding?

The Mike Huckabee & John McCain tag team gives me the creeps. One is utterly stupid, the other is crazy and together they will plot to open the borders wide open and declare amnesty.

651 posted on 01/09/2008 11:43:32 AM PST by apocalypto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 645 | View Replies]

To: AuntB; pissant; Calpernia

Whatever happened to the ~92%?????????????


652 posted on 01/09/2008 11:45:33 AM PST by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 625 | View Replies]

To: Pawtucket Patriot

You’re not going to bait me into a fight. I have more important things to do. Like fighting Hillary.


653 posted on 01/09/2008 11:45:47 AM PST by doug from upland (Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 650 | View Replies]

To: rickomatic
It is easier for us now to push back at our own when they try to do something we don’t like.

"Pushing back" is only talk. It's essentially a threat, or promise, not to vote for the bugger if he does the thing you oppose, or doesn't do the thing you favour.

What happens when he goes against you ... and then a year or two later, you go and vote for him anyway?

Seems to me, you lose your credibility. Will your "push back" do any good then? Or will the politicians correctly view it as mere empty posturing?

654 posted on 01/09/2008 11:46:16 AM PST by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilisation is aborting, buggering, and contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 369 | View Replies]

To: processing please hold
many on FR are talking about voting for him now.

I'll never vote for McRino, the author of Campaign Finance Reform and leader of the removal of our 1st Amendment Rights....among other things.

655 posted on 01/09/2008 11:49:42 AM PST by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 563 | View Replies]

To: Chunga

I’m with Ayn Rand on this. Let people experience the consequences of their actions - in this case the consequence of voting socialists into office. Then maybe we can get back to Constitutionalism.

We have already lost the America we are all here defending. We are so far to the left of center today that our great-grandparents wouldn’t recognize this country. It will take a major restructuring/paring of government to get us out of this hole.

We have a choice of sliding into socialism with RINOs, or getting there more quickly with the Dims. I don’t see the difference, because in another generation, with the socialists running the curriculum in public schools and the left-wing social consciences represented by the likes of Huckabee, we will have no conservatives left in our young and we will see a permanent democrat majority in our lifetime.

In any case, in a decade or two, entitlements in the form of Medicare/SS and the Boomer generation will totally engulf us and we will look like Russia. Before that, the problems in the world financial systems, the WOT and illegal immigration/amnesty will clean us out, and we will be a pale husk of what we were.

I just don’t see any benefit to McCain, other than that he hasn’t enriched himself at the public trough ... since the Keating 5.


656 posted on 01/09/2008 11:50:33 AM PST by cinives (On some planets what I do is considered normal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 468 | View Replies]

To: Pistolshot
In that regard, ANY of the Repubs will be better than ANY of the Dims. And remember this is not just about control of the WH. It's about SCOTUS appointments.

The war, SS, abortion, 2nd Amendment, immigration, and any of the other issues facing the country are secondary to SCOTUS appointments. IMHO.

I agree - except that I feel our very freedoms rest on both the SCOTUS and winning the WOT - which we won't if we let the Communists/Islamist collusionists in

657 posted on 01/09/2008 11:50:57 AM PST by maine-iac7 (",,,but you can't fool all of the people all the time" LINCOLN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies]

To: maine-iac7

I will vote for anyone if it is vote against the beast!!!!!


658 posted on 01/09/2008 11:52:27 AM PST by oldenuff2no
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 657 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg
No, never.

He has been fighting to weaken the Republican party for years and I will not aid him in that quest.
659 posted on 01/09/2008 11:53:58 AM PST by elizabetty ("Nothing great was ever achieved without enthusiasm." .Ralph Waldo Emerson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg
Won't vote...

Sorry, just can't vote for crazy people to be in charge of the Nukes.

660 posted on 01/09/2008 11:54:23 AM PST by Mad Dawgg ("`Eddies,' said Ford, `in the space-time continuum.' `Ah,' nodded Arthur, `is he? Is he?'")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 621-640641-660661-680 ... 1,061-1,076 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson