Don't presume to lecture me on what conservatives do and don't, n00b. I've lectured better folks than you on the topic.
Conservatives ... don't enable the election of troop-hating, wealth-redistributing tax-hikers by voting for them when they have the temerity to run for President as Republicans.
Here's a hint for you: Stop talking
Way to go, Josef. And what if I don't shut up and sit down? Hmmmm? Is it off to the Gulag with me?
As a non-Republican
I really wish conclusion-jumping was an Olympic Sport. Really. You'd guarantee the USA a Gold Medal it.
I'm not presuming. You're as ignorant as I've seen here in six years.
Conservatives ... don't enable the election of troop-hating, wealth-redistributing tax-hikers by voting for them when they have the temerity to run for President as Republicans.
And there's unmitigated proof.
Here's a hint for you: Stop talking
Way to go, Josef. And what if I don't shut up and sit down? Hmmmm? Is it off to the Gulag with me?
Another dumb tactic you employ is excerpting replies and addressing them as though you were addressing replies in full, then smearing the poster as though your post rebutted the full substance of the excerpt.
As a non-Republican
I really wish conclusion-jumping was an Olympic Sport. Really. You'd guarantee the USA a Gold Medal it.
Republicans don't address fellow Republicans in the second or third person. Republicans speak of Republicans in the first person, as in "we had better not nominate Turd and Stool"...
Of course, that word choice violates Reagan's Eleventh Commandment...further evidence of your non-Republicanism.
Any Republican reading this thread can see it. It's all neatly portrayed in your language.
It's okay, although you'd be better off shucking the denial.