Will FR embrace socialism to make way for Rudy Giuliani as a Republican presidential candidate?

vanity | April 21, 2007 | Jim Robinson

[Jim Robinson]

We've got some real challenges facing us. FR was established to fight against government corruption, overstepping, and abuse and to fight for a return to the limited constitutional government as envisioned and set forth by our founding fathers in the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution and other founding documents.

One of the biggest cases of government corruption, overstepping and abuse that I know of is its disgraceful headlong slide into a socialist hell. Our founders never intended for abortion to be the law of the land. And they never intended the Supreme Court to be a legislative body. They never intended God or religion to be written out of public life. They never intended government to be used to deny God's existence or for government to be used to force sexual perversions onto our society or into our children's education curriculum. They never intend for government to disarm the people. They never intended for government to set up sanctuary cities for illegals. They never intended government to “rule” over the people and or to take their earnings or private property or to deprive them of their constitutional rights to free speech, free religion, private property, due process, etc. They never intended government to seize the private property of private citizens through draconian asset forfeiture laws or laws allowing government to take private property from lawful owners to give to developers. Or to seize wealth and redistribute it to others. Or to provide government forced health insurance or government forced retirement systems.

All of the above are examples of ever expanding socialism and tyranny brought to us by liberals/liberalism.

FR fights against the liberals/Democrats in all of these areas and always will. Now if liberalism infiltrates into the Republican party and Republicans start promoting all this socialist garbage, do you think that I or FR will suddenly stop fighting against it? Do you think I'm going to bow down and accept abortionism, feminism, homosexualism, global warming, illegal alien lawbreakers, gun control, asset forfeiture, socialism, tyranny, totalitarianism, etc, etc, etc, just so some fancy New York liberal lawyer can become president from the Republican party?

Do you really expect me to do that?

[Kitty Mittens]

Standing with you 110%!

[NautiNurse]

I was a tad disappointed to see your post #14,354 was deleted, for it shines a bright light on your character, errr lack of character. Fortunately, with the wonders of the internet, I am able to reproduce your post into a reasonable likeness of its original format:

To: NautiNurse

[ugly words excerpted]

As far as my conservative credentials, I don’t have to justify myself to you you cookie baker. I maintain a family with young children and run a small business.

[libelous accusations excerpted]...

...and aren’t you a nautinurse...nauti nauti

14,354 posted on 04/28/2007 10:56:15 PM PDT by rbmillerjr

Now, let's focus on your "you you cookie baker" comment. In the context of your post, this appears to be another pointed spear in your barrage of insults and bully tactics. Indeed, I do bake cookies--albeit only for special occasions these days. Lots of good people bake good cookies. Some of my best friends bake cookies. My mother bakes cookies.

What is your problem with cookie bakers?

Your scornful "you you cookie baker" label reminds me of another aspersion against cookie bakers--by a famous socialist, crusty pantsuit-wearing liberal. The quote is posted below to refresh your memory. Posting quotes from famous people has become tres chic around here lately.

I suppose I could have stayed home and baked cookies--Hillary Clinton

Your attack on cookie bakers bears a striking resemblance to Hillary Clinton's snide remark about cookie bakers. Hillary--is that you in there, hiding behind the male moniker of rbmillerjr?

[Sam Cree]

That Rudy is the front running candidate just shows you where the Republican Party is these days - on an ever leftward drift with the rest of the US.

I do think he showed fortitude and leadership as mayor of NYC, but it’s discouraging when the conservative candidates are actually pretty far to the left.

[chasio649]

Grand Post.....

[Knitting A Conundrum]

Cromwell did bad things...but even a stopped clock has good information sometimes...

Sometimes we quote stuff not because of who said it, but because the quote says stuff that is interesting/neat/cool. Attributing the source is not necessarily an endorsement of the person - it’s saying, “Hey, I didn’t write this, and I’m not a plagarist.”

[rockrr]

Thanks for an actual link Kevmo. I had heard references to that place but wanted to see for myself.

What a sewer!

[rockrr]

I’m curious as to how you arrived at the 800 number...Surely you didn’t manually count each post?!

[Mo1]

What I’m seeing is very sad

[chasio649]

“bald headed god.”

---

I’m not a Rudy basher...but that’s funny no matter who you are...;)

btw...i’ve a glabrous noodle... ;)

[dukakis kerry the dream team]

What I’m seeing is very sad

Then why don't you brighten your day by going someplace else? Seriously.

[Lando Lincoln]

Thank you my good friend.

[Kevmo]

No thanks, let rudy retire to a quiet private life in San Fransisco where he can participate in gay parades to his hearts content.
***Thanks a lot. Dump him here in the bay area. You may have come up with one reason why I should vote for this guy.

[Knitting A Conundrum]

(((Kitty Mittens)))

[Luke21]

Yeah, mine bounces the glare off pretty good. But my minister had a great line, he said, “This guy Giuliani has the biggest libido since Bill Clinton.”

[Mo1]

Then why don't you brighten your day by going someplace else? Seriously.

Well .. you proved my point

So tell me .. what was you old sceen name??

[Chena]

A crazy falsehood, posted by one wacky poster. Clearly a nights rest didn't help your forum demeanor. You need a long vacation.

I don't know if you're being dense on purpose or what. LOL Yes, I actually accused YOU of being a Giuliani supporter and I must admit that I did it on purpose. You have wrongly accused me of being a Giuliani supporter in the past and you continue to do so. Now, dear man, how does it feel when someone implies that YOU are a Rudy supporter when you know that you are not.

[dukakis kerry the dream team]

You didn’t answer my question.

[Mo1]

nice dodge

[dukakis kerry the dream team]

You didn’t answer my question.

[Skywarner]

"I see you’re using the latest Howlin tactic of “supporting” some other candidate while spending the bulk of your time whining about why rudy isn’t respected by this forum."

See, this is just additional proof that you haven't read - or learned from - a darn thing in this thread.

You seem to claim that I'm "supporting" other candidate(s) while "whining" about why Rudy isn't being respected here on FR. Unfortunately, your premise is faulty. In fact, it's not even based in fact at all.

I have repeatedly expressed my support, at this early stage of the political process, for Thompson and then Hunter. My consternation continues, and I will put this in caps to make it very clear, because I DO NOT APPRECIATE THE WAY FELLOW FREEPERS ARE BEING TREATED AS PART OF THE GREAT PURGE OF 2007. Numerous CONSERVATIVE members, who have made it clear as day that they do not support Rudy at all, have also voiced their concerns. Instead of even listening to them, they are instead labeled as Rudy-Bots, mocked, repeatedly sworn at, and basically told to go to hell. Is this something you're proud of?

Regardless, if this is the type of forum you wish to be a part of, then it is I who wishes you the best of luck. You're in the Big Time now. Make the most of it while this forum has any relevance at all...