Will FR embrace socialism to make way for Rudy Giuliani as a Republican presidential candidate?

vanity | April 21, 2007 | Jim Robinson

[Jim Robinson]

We've got some real challenges facing us. FR was established to fight against government corruption, overstepping, and abuse and to fight for a return to the limited constitutional government as envisioned and set forth by our founding fathers in the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution and other founding documents.

One of the biggest cases of government corruption, overstepping and abuse that I know of is its disgraceful headlong slide into a socialist hell. Our founders never intended for abortion to be the law of the land. And they never intended the Supreme Court to be a legislative body. They never intended God or religion to be written out of public life. They never intended government to be used to deny God's existence or for government to be used to force sexual perversions onto our society or into our children's education curriculum. They never intend for government to disarm the people. They never intended for government to set up sanctuary cities for illegals. They never intended government to “rule” over the people and or to take their earnings or private property or to deprive them of their constitutional rights to free speech, free religion, private property, due process, etc. They never intended government to seize the private property of private citizens through draconian asset forfeiture laws or laws allowing government to take private property from lawful owners to give to developers. Or to seize wealth and redistribute it to others. Or to provide government forced health insurance or government forced retirement systems.

All of the above are examples of ever expanding socialism and tyranny brought to us by liberals/liberalism.

FR fights against the liberals/Democrats in all of these areas and always will. Now if liberalism infiltrates into the Republican party and Republicans start promoting all this socialist garbage, do you think that I or FR will suddenly stop fighting against it? Do you think I'm going to bow down and accept abortionism, feminism, homosexualism, global warming, illegal alien lawbreakers, gun control, asset forfeiture, socialism, tyranny, totalitarianism, etc, etc, etc, just so some fancy New York liberal lawyer can become president from the Republican party?

Do you really expect me to do that?

[Knitting A Conundrum]

10,000 didn’t have a flag, but I was the first with a flag afterwards...10,001

[rbmillerjr]

Gig’m Aggies ohman

well I had a premature 10,000tulation at 9,995

[rbookward]

— You though are looking for post 10000.

You saw through me. Here I was trying to give the impression of high ideals and great intelligence and you pull the curtain back. Thanks a lot!

[Tennessee Nana]

Thats working too

:)

[NoGrayZone]

Me, my money and my time are just waiting for him to throw himself into the ring!

[T'wit]

I got so distracted myself that I completely missed the big moment :-) :-)

[processing please hold]

Congrats, you’re the 10,000th post.

[jedward]

Ohhhh, you were so close.

[airborne]

Congratulations!

10,000 posts!

Now let’s get back to stomping liberal trolls!!

8^) (sarcasm)

[CindyDawg]

Congratulations. I would have had it but I couldn’t get that arrow where I wanted it. LOve the flags , yall.

[Knitting A Conundrum]

I used to be pretty good at ebay sniping...

[rbookward]

— You are too funny! I enjoyed it, thanks.

And you’re too kind. (No, really, you are too kind. Get mad and sling some random insults. See if you can get someone to start throwing chairs.)

[MrEdd]

You see, unlike many who still remain here, I recognize that not everyone thinks exactly alike, and it doesn’t make them evil, stupid, or traitorous.

I have posted this inference before.
I am going to post it in stronger terms now. WE are at war with a political entity attached to a religion. They intend to do this:

To all those who fail to submit to them, in the name of their god. They say this and expound upon it every day. Keeping our borders open makes it fairly likely that they will accomplish this at some point. Even if detected they may succeed before intercepted.

After this happens there will be a violent reaction against those who refused to close the borders, possibly a civil war depending on the circumstances.
Even if it happens soon and this guy

Who I am fond of is in office to take the heat.
It will be fully justified.

I will put forth the proposition now, that in the event of a nuclear attack coming through our porous borders most of America will agree that Refusing to close the borders, and opposing the same is indeed, evil, stupid, and traitorous.

I will not vote for a candidate who will let my ideology be linked to a refusal to protect the american people with every reasonable means. Period.

[Brad’s Gramma]

Don’t leave out ROSIE!

:)

[No Blue States]

Can you pick my lotto numbers? 10k, Iwo Jima. Youve made history.

[1COUNTER-MORTER-68]

The One You Never See...

[Tennessee Nana]

Go Vols Go

:)

[mkjessup]

"Brawling on FR? I'm shocked. Shocked I tell you"

"yeaaah, I remember that day too well, the Germans wore grey, and you're still wearing pink, ya freakin' RINO."

[Petronski]

[airborne]

No,thank you!

And God bless you!