Skip to comments.
LIVE THREAD
Senate Debate on Nomination of Samuel A. Alito
C-Span2 ^
| Jan 26, 2006
Posted on 01/26/2006 6:51:27 AM PST by katieanna
Debate continues in the Senate today on the nomination of Samuel Alito to the Supreme Court. At present no time has been announced for a final vote. Stop by and discuss.
TOPICS: Breaking News; Government
KEYWORDS: 109th; alito; alitovote; scotus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160, 161-180, 181-200 ... 1,401-1,412 next last
To: katieanna
The dems are still deciding what they're going to doThey are caught between funding from their Moonbat base and the reality of what happens if they fillibuster (ie. Bush will push thru an even more conservative nominee, maybe two).
161
posted on
01/26/2006 8:45:58 AM PST
by
Fenris6
(3 Purple Hearts in 4 months w/o missing a day of work? He's either John Rambo or a Fraud)
To: conservativebabe; All
Sorry, a bit off topic, but love to see Hillary! stumble again ...
http://www.nynewsday.com/news/nationworld/nation/ny-uswalm264601565jan26,0,2153631.story?coll=ny-nationalnews-print
Clinton: Cover employees
Senator pushes for Wal-Mart's contribution to workers' health plans, but is unclear whether she took that stand as retailer's board member
January 26, 2006
WASHINGTON -- Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton wants Wal-Mart to contribute to health insurance for its employees - but can't recall if she pushed for worker benefits during six years as a paid board member for the nation's largest retailer.
(snip)
Asked if she had advocated better benefits while serving as a board member with Arkansas-based Wal-Mart from 1986 to 1991, Clinton replied,
"Well, you know, I, that was a long time ago ... have to remember," adding that "obviously I believe every company should" contribute to benefit plans.
(snip)
162
posted on
01/26/2006 8:46:07 AM PST
by
maggief
(and the dessert cart rolls on ...)
To: PerConPat
Ping me if you find Coburn's comments on a transcript or video!
163
posted on
01/26/2006 8:46:30 AM PST
by
RasterMaster
("Bin Laden shows others the road to Paradise, but never offers to go along for the ride." GWB)
To: kentj
Very Sad but very telling how the democrats believe that the courts should be the creators of law. It is blindly clear that they think if they can control the courts then they still have a chance at controlling the country. The fact that the Democrats are willing to declare against an extremely well qualified nominee on almost a party line vote convinces me that their primary objective is not the good of the nation, but the good of their party.
On the other side of the world Americans are giving their young lives for the ideals of our country and here at home a "political club" is trying to abort those same ideals.
164
posted on
01/26/2006 8:46:42 AM PST
by
oldbrowser
(No matter how cynical I get, I can't seem to keep up)
To: The_Victor
Can someone with a hazmat suit check DU for their reaction?
I don't dare go to DU at work. The foul language on my system could get me fired.
165
posted on
01/26/2006 8:47:23 AM PST
by
rwa265
(The Promises of the Lord, I Will Proclaim Forever)
To: rwa265
How is Lieberman planning on voting?
166
posted on
01/26/2006 8:47:35 AM PST
by
Hildy
(The only difference between a rut and a grave is the depth)
To: katieanna
Here! Thanks for the thread.
To: gov_bean_ counter
More than a little, I would imagine.
168
posted on
01/26/2006 8:48:22 AM PST
by
rwa265
(The Promises of the Lord, I Will Proclaim Forever)
To: Cboldt; All
So far Nelson, Johnson, Landrieu, Salazar and Byrd have said they will not support a filibuster, so that puts the count right at 39 (i.e. 44 dems-5 no filibuster).
Time for Reid to cave and get on with the vote.
169
posted on
01/26/2006 8:48:33 AM PST
by
katieanna
(There is a point to life and it's not the decimal.)
To: syriacus
Good...I say the more time people hear her, whiny, nasally, monotone voice, the less chance they'll want to vote for her.
170
posted on
01/26/2006 8:48:54 AM PST
by
Hildy
(The only difference between a rut and a grave is the depth)
To: Cboldt
This was announced on Fox 55 Republicans and 2 Dems will be voting to confirm Alito.
171
posted on
01/26/2006 8:49:38 AM PST
by
shield
(The fear of the LORD is the beginning of knowledge: but fools despise wisdom and instructions.Pr 1:7)
To: Hildy
Aw come on, we love Joe Lieberman on foreign policy and defense, but he's a loyal liberal domestically. He gets a pass because he is the best that we have to the loyal opposition.
Lieberman will vote no.
172
posted on
01/26/2006 8:49:57 AM PST
by
saveliberty
(Proud to be Head Snowflake, Bushbot and a new member of Sam's Club)
To: maggief
but can't recall if she pushed for worker benefits during six years as a paid board member for the nation's largest retailer. Very interesting. My sister is an "anti-Wal-Mart" liberal who moved to Arkansas a few years back. I wonder if she knows Hillary was on the board.
173
posted on
01/26/2006 8:50:11 AM PST
by
syriacus
(All you need to know about Hillary --- She admired Saul Alinsky; she feels SOME humans deserve life.)
To: Preachin'
http://news.minnesota.publicradio.org/features/2006/01/24_hetlandc_sdabortionlegis/
"Thelma Underberg, executive director of NARAL Pro-Choice South Dakota, says she's not surprised by the legislation introduced this week -- but she's disappointed.
"There's not much interest in what happens after birth, or what kind of situation the mother is in, or what kind of situation she's might be bringing children into the world," says Underberg."
Abortion isn't a form of birth control, uh huh, riiiiiiiight.
174
posted on
01/26/2006 8:51:15 AM PST
by
pillut48
(CJ in TX)
To: maggief
"Well, you know, I, that was a long time ago ... have to remember," My brain is Jello.....jello......jello.
175
posted on
01/26/2006 8:51:57 AM PST
by
Godzilla
(When smoking a fish, never inhale.)
To: maggief
"Sorry, a bit off topic, but love to see Hillary! stumble again ..."
Should there be a rule that a Hillary! stumble is never off topic? :-)
176
posted on
01/26/2006 8:52:09 AM PST
by
rwa265
(The Promises of the Lord, I Will Proclaim Forever)
To: Hoodat
"Have WE got a SHOW for YOUUUUUU!!!"
We love the Veggies here too. Such a good character building series.
177
posted on
01/26/2006 8:52:10 AM PST
by
pillut48
(CJ in TX)
To: All
Inouye, a democrat representing Hawaii, is speaking next. He is somewhat moderate, and a gang of 14 member. Will be interesting to see where he falls, though if he is being allowed by the democrats to speak first during their debate hour, I imagine he'll announce his opposition to Samuel Alito.
178
posted on
01/26/2006 8:53:05 AM PST
by
NapkinUser
("Our troops have become the enemy." -Representative John P. Murtha, modern day Benedict Arnold.)
To: Hildy
No 'listening tour' for a federal campaigner. Audiences would be forced to hear Hillary's stentorian voice. That alone would guarantee her opposition an avalanche of votes. HaHa
179
posted on
01/26/2006 8:53:41 AM PST
by
Carolinamom
(Comedy is simply a funny way of being serious. ---- Peter Ustinov)
To: Carolinamom
180
posted on
01/26/2006 8:54:05 AM PST
by
colorcountry
(Currently not in the process of becoming a God!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160, 161-180, 181-200 ... 1,401-1,412 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson