Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hugh Hewitt exposed, read this and weep (Redstate.org)
RedState.org ^ | 10-14-2005 | anonymousbosch

Posted on 10/14/2005 4:17:25 PM PDT by Stellar Dendrite

It's very interesting to go to RadioBlogger's july 2005 archives and read what Mr. Hewitt was saying about the SC back then. Here's a small sample. I'll put them all together, the perfect ingredients for a ** sandwich:

Hugh Hewitt on why federal judicial experience and a track record do matter:

You see, I've tried to explain to people about Judge Janice Rogers Brown, that she has not been a federal judge. And my concern over her and Priscilla Owen is, that federal judges just do different things than state judges. And I want to see a little bit from them, before you run as a conservative. I don't want to run blind. And I think she really hasn't done, for example, federalism issues, hasn't done federal pre-emption, hasn't interpreted the free exercise of the establishment clause, though there are Constitutional counterparts in California. That's my concern, Erwin. I just don't think they're reliable enough when it comes to understanding how they'll handle federal issues.

Hugh Hewitt on why age matters and why you don't want someone close to 60:

HH: You know, I had this argument with people earlier. I view every year as 70 votes. So when you trade from a Luttig or a Roberts at 50-51, or McConnell, or even a Miguel Estrada at 44, you're giving up seven hundred votes, seven hundred decisions. That's a lot of future influence for a president to give away to someone who he doesn't know who it's going to be.

and

Now let me close with Larry Thompson and Ted Olson, in the Washington Post write-up, as well as J. Harvey Wilkinson. They're all a little long in the tooth, really.

and now for the COUP DE GRACE. Hugh Hewitt on why Brilliance and Intellectual Greatness matter:

I want to pause for a moment, because you'll say great things about Luttig, Roberts and McConnell, as I have. There is an argument for brilliance that's got to be made here. And I don't know some of these judges. But those three I do, and they're brilliant. And brilliance matters, even if you're a dissent, because you've got to mold the law schools. You've got to mold the professions. You've got to look ahead. I think Bush needs to go for someone about whom there is no question of intellectual...the capacity for intellectual greatness.

Your Honor, Mr. Hewiit is GUILTY of fraud in his support for Miers. The evidence is clear and convincing, beyond a shadow of a doubt.


TOPICS: Front Page News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: allyourhughhewitt; arebelongtous; bushsquagmier; disgrace; harrietmiers; hughhewitt; hughhewwit; kingofallrinos; miers; ownage; owned; rino; rinopundit; scotus; shame
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 321 next last
To: trubluolyguy
Not that I am an "old salt" by any stretch.

Anyone over a year here I treat as a veteran. :)

201 posted on 10/14/2005 6:50:07 PM PDT by Map Kernow ("I hold it that a little rebellion now and then is a good thing" ---Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 197 | View Replies]

To: cherub05
Now, though, many so-called conservatives have eagerly embraced the weapons of borking

Given that Hewitt has taken to reading people out of the conservative movement that he disagrees with, maybe he should expect a little return fire to come his way.

202 posted on 10/14/2005 6:52:40 PM PDT by vbmoneyspender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies]

To: pbrown

"Where can I find those writings that turned you against her nomination, please?"

http://blogs.citypages.com/blotter/2005/10/harriet_miers_d.asp

http://frum.nationalreview.com/archives/10092005.asp


203 posted on 10/14/2005 6:53:19 PM PDT by governsleastgovernsbest (check out my posts on Today show bias at www.newsbusters.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 198 | View Replies]

To: Map Kernow

Anyone over a year here I treat as a veteran. :)




Well, I guess I am no rookie.


204 posted on 10/14/2005 6:53:36 PM PDT by trubluolyguy (Disciplining ourselves to provide the opportunity for thought and analysis has to rise again to a hi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies]

To: dubyaismypresident
Not only that, which isn't suprising, the RNC is running attack ads against Chafee's Republican opponent. The ad, if you haven't seen it, is over at NRSC.org and it demonizes oil, oil drilling, and stockbrokers.

Are you serious? If so, my theory is correct; some liberal thinkers are having influence in the WH. I suspect Andrew Card. What's up?

205 posted on 10/14/2005 6:54:05 PM PDT by chiller (Libs prove once again they can not be trusted with power..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

Thank you very much for your trouble.


206 posted on 10/14/2005 6:54:17 PM PDT by processing please hold (Islam and Christianity do not mix ----9-11 taught us that)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 203 | View Replies]

To: Stellar Dendrite

Glad to see the pro-miers crowd is taking the high road as always...

I've figured out how it is...they may be residing in the bizarro world.

In the bizzarro world, drawing attention to what someone has done or written, or the manner in which they've done or written it is considered a 'personal attack'.

However, calling people names, like "dumb", "dubma**", "Crybaby", "sexist", or insinuating that they're gay or drunk is the highest form of intellectual debate.

Din't realize they had internet connections to the bizarro world. Learn something new every day.


207 posted on 10/14/2005 6:54:56 PM PDT by flashbunny (Loyalty is earned, not handed out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 194 | View Replies]

To: txrangerette; trubluolyguy; Stellar Dendrite
I disagree, but I see the Mods agree with you.

Whatever...

208 posted on 10/14/2005 6:55:42 PM PDT by Itzlzha ("The avalanche has already started...it is too late for the pebbles to vote")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 199 | View Replies]

To: lonestar67
I would like to read evidence as to why Harriet Miers is not brilliant.
I continually read and hear among conservatives that she is not smart enough for their standards.
Someone, please explain how it is known that Miers is not the smartest mind to ever join the Court.

That's easy - - it's the same way that liberals "know" that George W. Bush is a buffoon.

209 posted on 10/14/2005 6:55:57 PM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard

you sadly speak the truth


210 posted on 10/14/2005 6:57:36 PM PDT by lonestar67
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 209 | View Replies]

To: LibLieSlayer; Oklahoma
Keep in mind many of the trouble makers are really supporters of John McCain, Pat Buchanan, Ross Perot, and liberal Democrats.

Exactly. Most of the people who are on the anti-Miers band wagon are the usual collection of Bush haters who have hated him since 2000. Some because the GOP told Pat Buchanan to take a flying leap while others simply because President Bush doesn't take their position one a single issue. They bash the President over everything he does worse than the DUmmiers ever could.

Then you have a collection of e-thugs who are here simply to try and start sh*t, disrupt the forum, and get people they do no like banned. Most of these are people who were banned from FR and now conjugate at Liberty Post and are part of the Boot Hill gang that actually run a FR hit list and Jim Robinson is #1 on it.

211 posted on 10/14/2005 7:00:21 PM PDT by COEXERJ145 (Cindy Sheehan, Pat Buchanan, John Conyers, and David Duke Are Just Different Sides of the Same Coin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
Thanks. By the way, your morning post about the Today show and their "staged" flooding story is one for the books. LOL X 10.

Standards don't apply to them. POS all !

212 posted on 10/14/2005 7:02:19 PM PDT by chiller (Libs prove once again they can not be trusted with power..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt
The thing is most of our so-called conservative pundits need to be stripped naked, tarred and feathered, and then rode out of town on a rail. Maybe by starting with Laura Ingraham and Ann Coulter. LOL

These Harvard and Yale pseudo-sophisticates (and other northeastern Ivy League types) make me sick to my stomach. This isn't a philosophical battle, it's cultural and class warfare. We have an Evangelical Christian woman from the Southwest that I wanted stuffed down the throats of all the arrogant, elitist clowns like Kristol, Will, and Frum.
213 posted on 10/14/2005 7:03:04 PM PDT by Oklahoma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 200 | View Replies]

To: BurbankKarl

I gave it its own thread.


214 posted on 10/14/2005 7:04:06 PM PDT by EveningStar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Stellar Dendrite
Excuse me, Miers is the Heretic that needs to be Burned at the Stake!! LOL

Pray for W and Harriet Miers

215 posted on 10/14/2005 7:05:03 PM PDT by bray (Islam IS a terrorist organization)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 194 | View Replies]

To: uncbob
As many posters have pointed out you won't learn a hell of a lot at the hearings

Perhaps you won't, I'll probably learn a helluva lot more than I already know.

216 posted on 10/14/2005 7:05:45 PM PDT by BigSkyFreeper ("Tucker Carlson could reveal himself as a castrated, lesbian, rodeo clown ...wouldn't surprise me")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: bray

hey, you said it not me!!!!!!!!


217 posted on 10/14/2005 7:06:07 PM PDT by Stellar Dendrite ( Mike Pence for President!!! http://acuf.org/issues/issue34/050415pol.asp)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 215 | View Replies]

To: Oklahoma
The thing is most of our so-called conservative pundits need to be stripped naked, tarred and feathered, and then rode out of town on a rail. Maybe by starting with Laura Ingraham and Ann Coulter. LOL

The marketplace of ideas and advertizing will sort that out.

218 posted on 10/14/2005 7:06:41 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 213 | View Replies]

To: Oklahoma
"Keep in mind many of the trouble makers are really supporters of John McCain, Pat Buchanan, Ross Perot, and liberal Democrats."

You forgot to mention that they kill a kitten each time they question the Miers nomination. And that since the oppose President Bush they hate America, mom and apple pie, and probably shop at Costco.
219 posted on 10/14/2005 7:06:44 PM PDT by fallujah-nuker (Open Borders: The RINOcracy waging class warfare against American wage earners)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: Stellar Dendrite
You and Dumb Bunny are High Priests of the Conservative Movement and decide who is "Conservative" and who is not.

Pray for W and Our Freedom Fighters

220 posted on 10/14/2005 7:07:00 PM PDT by bray (Islam IS a terrorist organization)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 194 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 321 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson