Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ann Coulter just took apart SCOTUS nominee on the Mike Rosen show (My report)
Ann Coulter's appearance on the Mike Rosen show, 850am KOA ^ | This morning, Mon. Oct. 4th | Report from Mike Rosen show

Posted on 10/04/2005 10:39:32 AM PDT by ajolympian2004

Ann Coulter just took apart President Bush's SCOTUS nominee on the air during her appearance on the Mike Rosen show here in Denver on 850am KOA. She called for listeners to write their senators to oppose the nomination. Wish you could have heard it!

Ann said - "Totally unqualified", called Judge Roberts "a 'dream' candidate in light of this nomination", mentioned "cronyism" over and over. Much more that I'm trying to digest. I called the station to see if they saved the audio, but no luck on that. Mike Rosen was just about speechless as Ann went on and on about why this was a lousy choice.

I agree with Ann. Huge mistake and missed opportunity.

Ann's choice, Janice Rodgers-Brown. Not enough intestinal fortitude in the White House to go with that choice.

Can't wait for Ann's column on this nomination later this week.


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: 850am; anncoulter; busheeple; coulter; dubyacandonowrong; dubyahasbecomehisdad; gutlesspubs; harrietmiers; koa; miers; mikerosen; scotus; supremecourt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 881-888 next last
To: ajolympian2004

I think Roberts WAS a dream candiate all by himself.


21 posted on 10/04/2005 10:45:28 AM PDT by finnman69 (cum puella incedit minore medio corpore sub quo manifestu s globus, inflammare animos)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ajolympian2004
She also hated John Roberts.

http://anncoulter.com/cgi-local/article.cgi?article=66
22 posted on 10/04/2005 10:46:11 AM PDT by West Coast Conservative (Either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

I agree about Ann, but maybe she is not in on the strategy.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1496414/posts

This post puts things in a different light


23 posted on 10/04/2005 10:46:12 AM PDT by KC_for_Freedom (Sailing the highways of America, and loving it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07
A damn shame Annie has latched on to the Lefty talking point of the day

Unfortunately, this criticism is mostly warranted...and the President, who could have chosen anyone he wanted and had so many potential nominees with well-established track records as strong constitutional conservatives, has no one but himself to blame

24 posted on 10/04/2005 10:46:28 AM PDT by Irontank (Let them revere nothing but religion, morality and liberty -- John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ajolympian2004
Rulez...


25 posted on 10/04/2005 10:46:38 AM PDT by pageonetoo (You'll spot their posts soon enough!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ajolympian2004

I wonder if Bush is thinking more of the courts overall makeup, than the intellectual firepower of the nominee. For example, he gets Roberts in there, a sure fire, first rate thinker, and now, he nominates someone whom he knows and trusts, and he knows that she will be flexible towards Roberts' opinion, much like the Scalia-Thomas relationship. Maybe Bush is thinking more in terms of the GROUP, than the individuals.. hmmmm..


26 posted on 10/04/2005 10:46:48 AM PDT by Paradox (Just because we are not perfect, does not mean we are not good.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07
While J. Brown has served on the bench with distinction, she has served at the state level dealing with state issues until her recent elevation to the federal bench. Miers has been dealing with federal issue for much of Bush's term.

If Ann was promoting Edith Jones as more qualified, I would have to agree, but using Brown as her example, fatally flaws her argument.
27 posted on 10/04/2005 10:46:50 AM PDT by KC Burke (Men of intemperate minds can never be free....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist; Hurricane Andrew
Ann go eat something for Pete's sake

Can blood sugar levels affect mood?

28 posted on 10/04/2005 10:46:53 AM PDT by general_re ("Frantic orthodoxy is never rooted in faith, but in doubt." - Reinhold Niebuhr)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ajolympian2004
the rules, guys! :-)
29 posted on 10/04/2005 10:47:06 AM PDT by an italian (If I were two-faced, would I be wearing this one? A. LINCOLN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hurricane Andrew

Yeah, she's praising Roberts now, after putting him through the meat grinder. Every so often Ann hits a foul ball, like her column supporting the WoD. Her Roberts' columns, as well as her complaints against Meiers, is another example.


30 posted on 10/04/2005 10:47:06 AM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: kevao

You forgot "third party voter."


31 posted on 10/04/2005 10:47:13 AM PDT by the gillman@blacklagoon.com ( Welcome to the Canexico Community!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ajolympian2004

I LOVE Ann! But she may be wrong here. It is hard to remember 90% of what the media says about Bush is slanted. I would rather go with a personal selection than a Souter type pick.


32 posted on 10/04/2005 10:47:21 AM PDT by right right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ajolympian2004

All this talk about Black seats and female seats has me wondering when it comes time to nominate a Hispanic or Asian, etc., does the quota come from the existing White seats or will they take away a female or Black seat?


33 posted on 10/04/2005 10:47:31 AM PDT by VeniVidiVici (When a Jihadist dies, an angel gets its wings)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ajolympian2004

Ann darlin', we luv ya, but YOU couldn't get 50 Senate votes on a resolution praising sunshine...


34 posted on 10/04/2005 10:47:53 AM PDT by SirJohnBarleycorn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ajolympian2004

I'd just as soon see someone without a law background get on the court, so I have to disagree with Ann here about not having a good enough law school education. I think that's the "Esquire" in Ann talking. I guess there really is something to titles of nobility.


35 posted on 10/04/2005 10:47:54 AM PDT by andyk (Go Matt Kenseth!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07
A damn shame Annie has latched on to the Lefty talking point of the day.

Well, I've been saying it all day too. Looks like the editors at National Reivew agree with me. Yeah, looks like you're right, challenging Miers qualifications is definitely a lefty thing. /sacrasm

36 posted on 10/04/2005 10:48:05 AM PDT by sola_fide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: general_re

I wish I could get paid to be spun up. But the photo rule would be a deal stopper for me.


37 posted on 10/04/2005 10:48:05 AM PDT by Tijeras_Slim (Now that taglines are cool, I refuse to have one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: pageonetoo
Oops...the other Ann...


38 posted on 10/04/2005 10:48:08 AM PDT by pageonetoo (You'll spot their posts soon enough!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: ajolympian2004
Our spineless worms in the Senate couldn't even get a U.N. Ambassador confirmed, how in the hell would they be able to get Janice Rogers Brown Confirmed?

DO you not think President Bush knows he has pussies backing him up in the Senate?

Ann Coulter should be able to see this, with Chuck Hagel, Arlen Spector, Olympia Snowe, and at least three others side with the RATS over half of the time, we are not going to get a controversial nominee confirmed by these wimps, Janice Rogers Brown would not be where she is if it wasn't for 7 of our spineless worms backing away from the Nuclear Option. I wish Ann would think before she opens her mouth and makes a fool of herself

39 posted on 10/04/2005 10:48:11 AM PDT by MJY1288 (Whenever a Liberal is Speaking on the Senate Floor, Al-Jazeera Breaks in and Covers it LIVE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HamiltonJay

The prob is the weakness in the Republican bench. Bush has a majority on paper, but in political reality, he can't count on all the R's to stand with him in a big fight.

It's not the Rats he's running from. It's that he knows he the quarterback of a team that only puts 8 men on the field. The plays have to adjust when there's only half an offensive line and half a defense.


40 posted on 10/04/2005 10:48:37 AM PDT by wouldntbprudent ("Tell the truth. The Pajama People are watching you.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 881-888 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson