Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Infectious Evolution: Ancient Virus Hit Apes, Not Our Ancestors, In The Genes
Science News ^ | 3-5-2005 (issue) | Bruce Bower

Posted on 04/02/2005 11:48:39 AM PST by blam

Infectious Evolution: Ancient virus hit apes, not our ancestors, in the genes

March 5
Bruce Bower

A vicious virus infected ancestral chimpanzees and gorillas in Africa between 4 million and 3 million years ago. Not only did it kill a great many of these primates, but it also infiltrated the surviving animals' genomes, altering the course of evolution. That's the picture emerging from a new analysis of modern-primate DNA.

Around 1.5 million years ago, this virus of the class called retroviruses also infected ancestors of modern baboons and macaques, two African monkeys, reports geneticist Evan E. Eichler of the University of Washington in Seattle and his colleagues. However, no molecular remnants of this ancient infection appear in the DNA of people, whose ancestors also inhabited Africa, or in the genes of apes, such as orangutans, from Asia.

Retroviral infection "was almost a cataclysmic event for ancestral chimps and gorillas," Eichler says. "It's a mystery to us why the ancestors of people and orangutans were excluded from it."

While analyzing data from an ongoing project determining the chimpanzee genome, Eichler's team noticed sequences that dramatically differed from corresponding regions of human DNA. The team identified the sequences as the remains of a retrovirus.

Using chemical probes, the researchers then found more than 100 copies of the retrovirus throughout the chimp genome. These retroviral sequences disturb the workings of at least six genes, including ones found in the brain and testes.

Gorillas, baboons, and macaques also possessed about 100 retroviral copies. The researchers used available estimates of how quickly the retrovirus mutates to calculate when the infections occurred.

Several scenarios could explain the selective infection of ancient chimps and gorillas. African apes might have evolved a susceptibility to the infection, for example, or ancestors of people and Asian apes might have developed a resistance.

The new results, which the researchers report in the April PLoS Biology, fit with a surprising conclusion floated in a 2002 analysis of chimp DNA. That study found a dearth of mutations in chimp genes known to be crucial for repelling infections. Pascal Gagneux of the University of California, San Diego and his colleagues then proposed that this genomic feature was a reflection of an HIV-like retroviral epidemic among ancestral chimps nearly 3 million years ago that left only a few to pass on rare resistance genes. Today's chimps are thus the offspring of unusually virus-resistant animals.

"Retroviruses are not just diabolical [killers]," says Gagneux. "Under the right conditions, such viruses contribute to the evolution of their hosts."

Eichler's group provides "compelling evidence" of separate, comparably ancient retroviral infections in ancestral chimps and gorillas, remarks Harvard University's Maryellen Ruvolo. Chimps probably came in contact with the virus when they hunted infected monkeys, Ruvolo suggests. It's not clear how the infection reached gorillas.

The new evidence that closely related primates can contract different retroviral infections is surprising, says Dixie Mager of the University of British Columbia in Vancouver. "Most people in the field would not have predicted this finding," she adds.

Scientists have estimated that 8 percent of human DNA consists of retroviral sequences that were deposited during infections of our African-ape ancestors between 35 million and 25 million years ago.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: ancestors; ancient; apes; baboonmarker; elainemorgan; evolution; genes; ggg; godsgravesglyphs; helixmakemineadouble; hit; infectious; missinglink; multiregionalism; origins; palaeoanthropology; paleontology; primate; primates; primatology; virus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 next last
To: SunkenCiv; blam; PatrickHenry
> "Maybe neither were in Africa when this was going on."

"no molecular remnants of this ancient infection appear in the DNA of people, whose ancestors also inhabited Africa, or in the genes of apes, such as orangutans, from Asia"

Could be. The article mentions that macaques had the retroviral sequences, but didn't give details of whether they were Barbary (N. Africa) or the Japanese (Asian) Macaques.

If the 1.5 Mya time is correct, Homo would have had already branched off sufficiently.
On another hand, if it was introduced 4.0 Mya that makes for some interesting questions. Did Homo branch in spite of the virus, or because of it?

21 posted on 04/02/2005 3:56:57 PM PST by dread78645 (Sarcasm tags are for wusses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: blam

Darwinist propopganda.


22 posted on 04/02/2005 3:58:48 PM PST by balch3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

Quite the high-rise flat.

I don't imagine that it keeps out the critters that well.


23 posted on 04/02/2005 4:20:43 PM PST by roaddog727 (The marginal propensity to save is 1 minus the marginal propensity to consume.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: dread78645
"If the 1.5 Mya time is correct, Homo would have had already branched off sufficiently. On another hand, if it was introduced 4.0 Mya that makes for some interesting questions. Did Homo branch in spite of the virus, or because of it?"

I was watching a program last night on National Geographic titled: The Ultimate Survivor and they dated these guys to 1.75 million years, Stranger In A New Land. There's a 'tip' here. Also, on the same program, they showed that the 'Hobbits' on Flores had made shell necklaces 80k years ago...which H. Erectus wasn't suppose to be smart/capable enough to do.

24 posted on 04/02/2005 4:41:22 PM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: blam

25 posted on 04/02/2005 4:45:08 PM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: blam

Great post. This might turn out to be a very important finding.


26 posted on 04/02/2005 7:45:53 PM PST by Pharmboy ("Rebellion to tyrants is obedience to God")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Getready

Retro virus sequences stuck in the genome sure does muddy thigs up.


27 posted on 04/02/2005 10:17:07 PM PST by FastCoyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: balch3

Also, Replacement propaganda and "Out of Africa" propaganda.


28 posted on 04/03/2005 6:22:21 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (when did the tongue and cheek evolve?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: dread78645

It's not enough for the Replacement advocates, because that time frame directly impacts their claim.


29 posted on 04/03/2005 6:23:25 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (last updated my FreeRepublic profile on Friday, March 25, 2005.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: blam

A major fish kill a hundred million years before that caused fish to walk on the earth. Once upon a time ....


30 posted on 04/03/2005 9:43:28 AM PDT by -=Wing_0_Walker=-
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
"Our ancestors somehow avoided the plague, as did the orangutans."

No mystery here...everybody knows Orangs have the best doctors....


31 posted on 04/03/2005 9:49:43 AM PDT by Joe 6-pack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: blam
Might we have this whole 'out-of-Africa' thing backward?

Even if provable, the democrats and the NAACP will never permit such a thing to be suggested, let alone taught in schools.

32 posted on 04/03/2005 9:53:03 AM PDT by TN4Liberty (American... conservative... southern.... It doesn't get any better than this.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: blam

That's another problem...how can so called "random" mutations
occur at a "regular" rate? This concept is not particularly
new. Wilson and Sarich in 1969 postulated that the molecular
genetic clocks mutated at regular rates and that allowed them
to think that they could "time" when the primates diverged
into their respective lines. But the same problem...how
does a "random" process mutate at a regular rate? Maybe
it's not random. Maybe it has no bearing on the issue.

P.S....another conundrum is ...why don't living things "back-mutate?"
Could the weather, or whatever environmental influence
is allowing the mutation to survive also reverse?...What
would that concept do to the interpretation of the fossil
record??? I assume there is no evidence for that...why not?
Let's face it, bilogically speaking, the bacteria, and viruses
, and the insects seem to be better fit for this earthly environment,
then mammals...why did they "evolve" to a more precarious
position???? Please no funny comments, like "because it's there.!"


33 posted on 04/04/2005 10:56:12 AM PDT by Getready ((...Fear not ...))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Getready; SunkenCiv
I don't exclude any possibility.

Orangutans and human origins

Evolutionary Evidence Origin of the Theory Points of View

Dr. Jeffrey Schwartz, originator of the orangutan theory of human origins. Department of Anthropology, University of Pittsburgh. USA.

Humans have a larger number of features that are uniquely shared with orangutans than with any other living ape. Schwartz (1984) proposed that humans are more closely related to orangutans than to chimpanzees - a model that contradicts the greater genetic similarity of base pair sequences in humans and chimpanzees.

The view presented here is that genetic similarity of base pair sequences is not a necessary measure of phylogenetic relationship and that morphology continues to exist as an independently reliable source of information on evolutionary relationships. The orangutan model presents a conundrum for biological systematics over how to chose between morphological and genetic evidence when they are in conflict.

34 posted on 04/04/2005 11:30:18 AM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: blam

I exclude one possibility, that there has been any comprehensive comparison of nuclear DNA sequences:

"a model that contradicts the greater genetic similarity of base pair sequences in humans and chimpanzees."

The human genome projects sequenced (mostly) single samples of each chromosomes, and one of those projects used (mostly) the samples from a single individual. There hasn't been a comprehensive chimp genome project. Bands on chromosomes are somewhat similar on chimps and humans, with the chimps (and gorillas, orangutans, and gibbons) having 24 chromosome pairs.


35 posted on 04/04/2005 10:10:12 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (last updated my FreeRepublic profile on Friday, March 25, 2005.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: blam; FairOpinion; StayAt HomeMother; Ernest_at_the_Beach
Just updating the GGG information, not sending a general distribution.

To all -- please ping me to other topics which are appropriate for the GGG list. Thanks.
Please FREEPMAIL me if you want on or off the
"Gods, Graves, Glyphs" PING list or GGG weekly digest
-- Archaeology/Anthropology/Ancient Cultures/Artifacts/Antiquities, etc.
Gods, Graves, Glyphs (alpha order)

36 posted on 01/30/2006 9:11:07 AM PST by SunkenCiv (In the long run, there is only the short run.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Human Ancestors Went Out Of Africa And Then Came Back... [1998]
ScienceDaily | Friday, August 7, 1998 | adapted from New York University materials
Posted on 12/17/2007 8:37:11 PM EST by SunkenCiv
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1940963/posts


37 posted on 12/17/2007 6:13:50 PM PST by SunkenCiv (Profile updated Monday, December 10, 2007____________________https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


 GGG managers are SunkenCiv, StayAt HomeMother & Ernest_at_the_Beach
Just updating the GGG info, not sending a general distribution.
The Scars of Evolution:
What Our Bodies Tell Us
About Human Origins

by Elaine Morgan
"The most remarkable aspect of Todaro's discovery emerged when he examined Homo Sapiens for the 'baboon marker'. It was not there... Todaro drew one firm conclusion. 'The ancestors of man did not develop in a geographical area where they would have been in contact with the baboon. I would argue that the data we are presenting imply a non-African origin of man millions of years ago.'"
and from FR: To all -- please ping me to other topics which are appropriate for the GGG list.


38 posted on 08/16/2012 7:45:46 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Just updating the GGG info, not sending a general distribution.
The Scars of Evolution:
What Our Bodies Tell Us
About Human Origins

by Elaine Morgan
"The most remarkable aspect of Todaro's discovery emerged when he examined Homo Sapiens for the 'baboon marker'. It was not there... Todaro drew one firm conclusion. 'The ancestors of man did not develop in a geographical area where they would have been in contact with the baboon. I would argue that the data we are presenting imply a non-African origin of man millions of years ago.'"
from the FRchives:

39 posted on 02/07/2015 9:28:45 AM PST by SunkenCiv (Imagine an imaginary menagerie manager imagining managing an imaginary men)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv; blam; FairOpinion; Ernest_at_the_Beach; 24Karet; 3AngelaD; 4ConservativeJustices
Apes and Ebola

In re Ebola, which is reported to be devastating primate populations: IOW, are we the vector, or are they? Same question for HIV, which IIRC, does not seem to effect primates as badly as it does humans.

40 posted on 02/07/2015 10:06:44 AM PST by Kenny Bunk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson