We would not be here today save for the second amendment and a strong military.

Best refutation of the Enviro-whacko global warming/ anthropomorphic cause of greenhouse gas production bunch to date:

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4499562022478442170

Here's another very conceise refutation of Dr. Al and the hypsters:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1835915/posts

Another great piece on the refutation of the "Global Warming" Dogma:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1839271/posts

And yet another.....

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1853623/posts

and even a better one yet - the hot water bottle effect - this one really lays it out.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2046413/posts
And yet another - this one is a nail in the coffin of Global Warming shillery
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2318659/posts?page=1

http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/04/10/lifelong-democrat-breckinridge-long-natural-born-citizen-means-born-on-the-soil-to-a-father-who-is-a-citizen/

The Atmosphere contains 380 ppm = 0.038% co2
Man contributes 14.4 ppm = 0.0014%
Man contributes 3.7% of the total co2. Therefore if the co2 levels went from 300 ppm to 380 ppm since the year 1900 then nature was responsible for 96.3% of the increase.
The real atmospheric warming substance is water vapor.
The atmosphere contains about 2-3% water vapor. Compare that with 0.0014% of mans co2.
That makes man significance 0.00056%
Now there is something really insignificant.