Posted on 07/06/2004 4:33:22 AM PDT by djf
NBC breaking says for sure it's Edwards for veep
Kerry's best chance is to not be seen. Every time he is in the focus, his poll numbers go down. Every time he is in the background, his poll numbers go up. So if the media is going to focus on him, great!
It was a mill, believe me. We heard it enough.
That's for sure! Edwards started running for President the minute he was elected to the senate. Spends most his time in Washinton. Has severely neglected North Carolina.
I think they're also hoping that Edwards nomination will be perceived as an honor for North Carolina. They really want to shake a southern state free and NC has what, about 15 electoral votes? It's so close that that could make a difference.
NC Repub Party needs to be on their toes from here on out.
Which stable is Theresa kept in at the family farm?
Sorry, couldnt resist.
I am pretty sure Kerry's numbers will go through the roof this week. :-0
About the 1960 election, it has been said that it was the Calvary and Union districts(cemetaries) of Chicago that pulled it out for Kennedy.
Ugh...says, WHOM?
And stop being so damn snotty.
And, if asking for a definitive ANSWER to a question is snotty, then you're in the wrong place.Might I suggest DU?
or
This one ticket that will NEVER carry a single one of the 11 states of the Old Confederacy.
?
Gephardt has no charm, but it's hard to throw mud on him. Edwards however has a lot of baggage as a trial lawyer who was personally responsible for running hospitals out of business (and even bragging about it). I'm glad he picked Edwards, I was really worried he'd pick Cleland.
Exactly, and I agree with your take on Feinstein. They don't need to try to appeal to the angry feminists when the angry feminists are practically at their beckon call no matter what side of a feminist issue they happen to believe.
The way she wiggles and squirms around as she is praising John-boy and John-girl makes her look like a cheap whore.
That is the fact!
So we now have the two senators with the worst attendance record on one ticket........LOL.
You didn't seem to have a problem throwing in your 2 cents in the first place, did you?
We will be seeing his "incoming" cabinet, his judge appointees, and be given all of the new programs to be signed as soon as he is "official" so that any thought of not passing them will be reported as "cuts".
Hiliary doesn't have to run in 2008; she could still run this year. Indeed, with the polls as close as they are, 2004 is the best shot she has. Another 4 years of prosperity under President Bush will only result in support for whoever the Pubbies trot out in 2008 (see Bush, George H.W.). Alternatively, if Ketchup Boy and the running-mate-of-the-month (can't be too careful, considering all the flip-flops and waffles in the Kerry household) do manage to win, there's no way she'll be able run in 2008 (see Kennedy, Teddy "Swimmer")
Says everybody in the state of North Carolina.
Thanks. From the getgo, Edwards has looked out for Edwards. Win or lose, Edwards will be running in '08. Look for it.
Didn't Little Suzie also think that Bush would lose in 2000? In my book, that makes a strikeout :-)
yes.. the "SAFE" choice..... and what of the fact that its two Senators running for office here. Was'nt Kennedy the last President voted in as a senator?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.