Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Are the Arabs, Arab?
Fontpagemagazine ^ | 22-04 | David Yeagley

Posted on 02/02/2004 5:07:04 AM PST by SJackson

The people of the Middle East have forgotten their legitimate ethnic heritage. . . and it's not "Arab."

Are the Arabs, Arab?
By David Yeagley
FrontPageMagazine.com | February 2, 2004


People in the Arabic world have forgotten who they are. The people of Lebanon, Syria, Jordan, Iraq, and even some "Palestinians," are not Arabs at all. Instead, they are descendents of very ancient peoples, with different cultural and ethnic origins.

Militant Arabs invaded these lands in the 7th century A.D. and forced "Arabic" culture on their ancestors. Mohammad’s new religion of Islam sought world dominion through coerced unity, crushing cultural diversity. But this doesn’t change the original history of the region and its inhabitants’ true, non-Arab ethnic identity.

Lebanon is ancient Phoenicia, dating from 3000 B.C. This land of mountain cedars was an international political identity by 1200 B.C. Some modern historians note the independent spirit of post-Islamic Lebanon, even without considering its exciting ethnic origins.

The Phoenicians of Lebanon were expert mariners and astute world traders. They colonized the Mediterranean. They had their own alphabet, on which the later Greek alphabet was based. They were quite civilized, and fine builders. Some scholars regard Gebeil, (Gebal, or Byblos, 7000 B.C.) as the oldest "city" in the world.

Syria had an ancient civilization. The cities of Ebla and Mari date back to 3000 B.C. Archeologists aren’t sure who built Ebla or Mari, but these cities were well established before the AkkADian invasions from Mesopotamia. Syria has been occupied by many different peoples, being in the midst of world trade routes. Syria’s original ethnicity is mysterious, but the people certainly weren’t Arabic, nor were any of the ancient occupying tribes.

Jordanian earth contains Paleolithic tools dating from 500,000 to 17,000 B.C. There are flint hand axes, knives, and scraping implements. Whose were these? Pottery begins in the late Neolithic period, from 5500 B.C. Amman is the site of much archeological work today, but the original ethnicity of the people is not so carefully exhumed. The Iron Age (from 1200 B.C.) evinces Moabites, Ammonites, and Edomites, but these were immigrants. The original people of the Jordon region may have been Semitic, but they were not Arabic.

Today’s Iraq is the land of the Sumerians, in the ancient Mesopotamian river valley. Iraq claims most of the glories in ancient civilization. (Egypt and Persia are the only competitors.) Through Iraq pass the great Tigris and Euphrates rivers. Here we find the renowned cities of Babylon, Ur, and Lagash. Beginning as early as 3000 B.C., the Sumerians developed an artful form of writing, called cuneiform. Babylon apparently had running water, with faucets and flushing toilets. Modern Iraqis may well believe they were better off as Sumerians than Arabs.

Who are the "Palestinians?" "Palestine" comes from the Hebrew (Semitic) word pelesheth, meaning "rolling" or migratory. (The root is pawlash, meaning to roll, or wallow. "Palestine" also means Philistine, or Philistia. Anciently, the Philistines inhabited the coast south of the Phoenicians. The Philistines were a distinct group.

But today’s "Palestinians" are from Syria, Jordon, Lebanon. Arabs want these countries to consider themselves Arab, because Arabs want to surround Israel with anti-Zionists. A modern "Palestinian" rarely claims his immediate national origins, let alone his ancient, indigenous genes.

But "my historical, ethnic ancestry begins 4,000 years ago," Rami, a Palestinian, reminds me by personal e-mail. "I am a Palestinian Melkite Christian of Phoenecian stock." He says the ancient Israelites did not destroy all the Canaanite tribes in Palestine, as commanded (Deut. 7), and therefore, such people still exist in Palestine today. (As a Phoenician, however, Rami is Lebanese, not "Palestinian.")

"There are two kinds of Arabs in this world," Rami continues, "Arabs from Arabia and Arabized arabs who were conquered by Arabs from Arabia. Palestinians consist of the tribes of Moab, Edom, Phonecia, Philistia, and others."

Certainly, Arabs needs an authentic Palestinian people to justify the demand for land and national autonomy. If the claim is based on real ethnicity, however, instead of some vague "Arabized" racial identity and prejudice, the claim may be a lot easier to deal with. It doesn’t involve the Arab’s fanatical hatred of the Jews. The "Palestinians" simply want a place for themselves, on their own ancient lands. Perhaps in this regard alone, a few "Palestinians" might be like American Indians after all.

Unfortunately, today the American Indian identity itself has been denigrated by fraudulent claims of non-Indians. Brett Fromson’s Hitting the Jackpot (2003) tells how a whole "tribe" of claimants not only obtained federal recognition, but created the largest single casino in the United States.

In any case, "Palestinians" should ask the United States for "federal recognition" as Philistine, or Canaanite nations, and shed their Arabized culture. Then they can have their own casinos, and leave Israel alone.


Dr. David A. Yeagley teaches humanities at the College of Liberal Studies, University of Oklahoma. His opinions are independent. He holds degrees from Yale, Emory, Oberlin, University of Arizona and University of Hartford. He is a member of the Comanche Tribe, Lawton, OK. For more information on Dr. Yeagley's initiative to teach patriotism in the schools, click here. E-mail him at badeagle2000@yahoo.com. View his website at http://www.badeagle.com.



TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Israel
KEYWORDS: arabworld; archaeology; davidyeagley; ggg; godsgravesglyphs; history
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 last
To: RightWhale
The remnants of the mongol army stayed in the region and intermarried.

Not true in the case of lands south of Central Asia. They were driven out. The ruling elites in Central Asia were Turkic-Mongols like Timur e Lang whose house the Timurids ruled Samarkand -- which was the greatest city after Baghdad had been raised by Hulega. Samarkand was renowned as a city of great architecture and art.
41 posted on 02/03/2004 5:03:57 AM PST by Cronos (W2004!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: stuartcr
. I question why beliefs in something that cannot be proven, are defended so zealously, sometimes to the point of violence.

It's human nature. We'd always fight about something. He**, if all of us were the same relgion, same skin colour, same ethnic group, same language, same height, same weight, same features, we'd stiull argue between those that ate boiled eggs from the small part and those who ate 'em from the larger part.
42 posted on 02/03/2004 5:13:39 AM PST by Cronos (W2004!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: stuartcr
What would be a better description og this area to describe the indigenous peoples, one easily recognised?

I really don't know. I'd call everyone from the portion from Arabia and Iraq and Syria and Armenia as Near-Easterners. I'd call all those around the Mediterranean as Mediterranean, whether they're from France, Italy or Morocco ro Turky or Israel.
43 posted on 02/03/2004 5:16:29 AM PST by Cronos (W2004!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: stuartcr
Your presumption is really the issue at hand - is the violence in question in actuality the offspring of 'over-zealous' beliefs? Do people kill really b/c they're obeying directives from a book?

There is a book I've read called the Disciples of Destruction which basically argues where you are coming from. It's not a mainstream book by any means. Much of the book is barely readable, to me, for the premise is based on the idea that religious activity of any kind is just irrational. I used to believe that too, until Christ came knocking ... now, fulfilling the spiritual drive in humans is more rational to me than filling the food and sex drives. I "get" it now.

Anyway, although the author makes lots of mistakes, I can see where he's coming from. The author equally tars the islamic, christian, jewish, talmudists, communists, marxists folks in a single group of nut cases who kill out of religious zeal. What the author doesn't acknowledge is that he is a typical man of faith himself - of the scientist/materialist variety. And he is morally above them all, b/c he doesn't experience, he thinks, the sensation of 'zeal'. (But, those PhD pseudo-Priests certainly do advocate killing - I've heard them do so ... but in their own special, subtle way - that's another story though.)

There's just one problem with his argument: killing during wars, though evil w/ fantastic abuse, has a self-evident result in the way of life we have today. Without war, the USA is a figment of imagination. Without our warriors, we are, put simply, not.

I'm no fan of war. But I would be stupid to ignore the reality that my way of life here ultimately was bought, purchased, sacrificed for, whatever you want to call it. The military cemeteries here and abroad filled w/ U.S. dead testify to the reality.

That all said, I have tested for myself the root cause of evil .... it took a long while, but the single word that serves adequately is "pride". I basically disagree w/ you that over-zealousness is the root of evil.

True, many have used the energy of zeal in an evil manner. But it was their pride in their own judgment that led to that energy's misapplication. Many zealous preachers do wondrous good in our world ... and nary an encouraging word about violence comes from them.

Evil's very essence is pride ... for from it, faiths of all stripes are born; and they all have in common one thing at root; faith in man's abilities. Then, killing in the name of man is not really killing .... it's relabeled as 'justified necessity'.

I suppose the above rambles a bit. Sorry. :)
44 posted on 02/03/2004 6:28:21 AM PST by gobucks (http://oncampus.richmond.edu/academics/classics/students/Ribeiro/laocoon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Cronos
Skin colour, ethnicity, physical characteristics, etc., are all tangible, easily proven traits...religious beliefs are not...that is what we are talking about...these are not the same thing. Why do people fight for these beliefs that cannot be proven? I understand fighting for food, land, women, tangible things...why ideas?
45 posted on 02/03/2004 6:29:42 AM PST by stuartcr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Cronos
OK, thanks.
46 posted on 02/03/2004 6:30:28 AM PST by stuartcr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: gobucks
Thanks for the input, I may try to find this book.
47 posted on 02/03/2004 6:33:36 AM PST by stuartcr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Cronos
Yosaarian (from Catch 22) was Assyrian!.......

That's an Armenian name.
48 posted on 02/03/2004 6:36:14 AM PST by dennisw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Cronos

The DVD Journal: Catch-22
... In essence, the story is about Yossarian (Alan Arkin), an Armenian-American bombardier
stationed on the Mediterranean island of Pianosa during World War II. ...
www.dvdjournal.com/reviews/c/catch22.shtml - 10k - Cached - Similar pages

Session on May 7, 2001
... going. Yossarian: He is said to be Assyrian, but his name is Armenian,
as can be recognized by the –ian his name ends in. His ...
angam.ang.univie.ac.at/sess2001/pr6Kraml2.htm - 13k - Cached - Similar pages

49 posted on 02/03/2004 6:41:37 AM PST by dennisw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: stuartcr
Why do people fight for these beliefs that cannot be proven? I understand fighting for food, land, women, tangible things...why ideas?

A couple of thoughts
It's ideas that are really important it's one of the things that separates us from animals.
The kind of extremeist that think it's ok to kill for an idea exist in all cultures(granted Islam seems to have more than their share of these today)
I would hope you are not saying that all ideas are equal? Remember the KKK(as an example) fight for an idea, and and so did Gen. Washington.
50 posted on 02/03/2004 8:21:34 AM PST by Valin (Politicians are like diapers. They both need changing regularly and for the same reason.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Valin
It would seem then, that the animals are the more civilised, as they fight/kill only for survival, not because they believe their God told them to. Maybe that's our punishment for original sin.....being human
51 posted on 02/03/2004 8:44:36 AM PST by stuartcr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

Just adding this to the GGG catalog, not sending a ping. Interesting ancient political history herein.
Please FREEPMAIL me if you want on, off, or alter the "Gods, Graves, Glyphs" PING list --
Archaeology/Anthropology/Ancient Cultures/Artifacts/Antiquities, etc.
The GGG Digest
-- Gods, Graves, Glyphs (alpha order)

52 posted on 12/01/2004 10:07:29 PM PST by SunkenCiv ("All I have seen teaches me trust the Creator for all I have not seen." -- Emerson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


· join list or digest · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark · post a topic ·

 
Gods
Graves
Glyphs
Just updating the GGG info, not sending a general distribution.

To all -- please ping me to other topics which are appropriate for the GGG list.
GGG managers are SunkenCiv, StayAt HomeMother, and Ernest_at_the_Beach
 

·Dogpile · Archaeologica · ArchaeoBlog · Archaeology · Biblical Archaeology Society ·
· Discover · Nat Geographic · Texas AM Anthro News · Yahoo Anthro & Archaeo · Google ·
· The Archaeology Channel · Excerpt, or Link only? · cgk's list of ping lists ·


53 posted on 06/04/2009 10:51:44 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/__Since Jan 3, 2004__Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson