Posted on 04/10/2015 3:43:26 PM PDT by entropy12
Walker 15 Bush 12 Carson 11 Cruz 10 Huckabee 10 Paul 9 Rubio 8 Christie 4 Perry 3 Santorum 2 Jindal 2 Kasich 1
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
CRUZ or WALK to victory. I can get behind either one. But we have to choose one of them.
Yet Obama was a senator (briefly) and he has been able to execute his leftist agenda and accomplish quite a bit. He set out to destroy the country, and he has almost succeeded.
Right after Cruz announced, I thought Rush did a very good job of demolishing the false argument that we need governors instead of senators. Rush asked if anyone really thought Obama would be a better leader if he had run a state. Of course the answer is no. Rush stated, correctly, that it isn't lack of experience that makes Obama a disaster---it's his ideology.
And of course the same principle applies to Ted Cruz. It's who he IS that's the determining factor.
Thanks, I was only asking for clarification. Cruz my latest crush? Not hardly. He is at the top of my list and has been for quite a while. Perhaps you misinterpreted the tone of my first posting? I’m not attacking you or Walker so maybe don’t come out as a completely sarcastic, defensive, dick in the future? Just a little feedback.. Don’t take it too personally ;)
The Tea Party should throw a mock election about half way through the primaries. Make it for conservatives only, and get the conservative candidates to agree to drop out, and support the winner. That winner could clean house on Jeb, and put an end to this advantage liberal Republicans have. We might even win a general election with someone who would make winning mean something.
It is nice that Walker is going to study up on it."
Ouch! That's gonna leave a mark, LOL.
Cruz has been one of the most outspoken leaders in the Senate against Obama’s illegal executive action. He will repeal all Obama’s executive orders and secure the border. His stance is that we need to enforce the laws currently on the books since lack of enforcement is what has led to this mess.
Cruz a “crush?”
Dang, naps, that’s funny coming from you. You go all hyper-emotional and fan-girlish about Santorum, and now Walker.
Thou dost project.
Don’t trust ANY news organization. Fox would sell out Cruz for 50 bucks.
Really you can blame 2008 on Romney, he kept out all the serious challengers by coming on as the rich candidate early in the primary, with all the big money sewn up and a massive army of Mormon campaign workers.
Thanks, I didn’t want to say it.
That’s fine. It just you guys always screw America when you don’t take my candidate seriously and ended up with Obama twice. If you would have had my back with Santorum instead of acting like a spoiled brat, then we would be in great shape, but you had to have your way and complain that Santorum supported Spector which is a completely idiotic reason to not support Santorum. Now you are trying to bash Walker so you can have your woman president Hillary Clinton. I know your game. I don’t care except that your selfishness has resulted in our country being a disaster.
By halfway through the primaries Jebster will have an insurmountable lead in delegates and be the presumotive nominee, see the last two primary cycles. By this time next year the RNC will have their amnesty candidate if we don’t unify early behind Ted Cruz.
There was no decent conservative to support in 08 or 12. This time it is different.
We screw America when we don’t take “your” candidate seriously...this forum should have had “your” back and everything would have been fine.
Wow.
Why not just skip the middleman and run for president yourself, naps? Then your fabulousness can shine unobstructed.
lol. Thanks, but I would be impeached first day.
I typically deny I have a sense of humor but that was pretty funny... lol.
Well, why don’t you stop tantruming and accusing those who disagree with you of being stealth Hillary bots.
The emotionalism is unbecoming.
“Scott has revoked illegals getting free tuition in his state.......not supportive of illegal aliens.”
Does it really? Isn’t giving criminals a free ride to an education on the taxpayer’s dime something any republican should be against?
How does that show that he is not supportive of illegals or against amnesty? I’m sure he would be against giving them free medical care and welfare too.
Walker fully expects immigrants to work and pay taxes. He thinks that they will add to the economy by providing cheap labor. For some reason he seems to only see that fiscal side of it and not the other side of the coin which will bring this country to fiscal and social ruin.
If last election didn’t happen, even I would agree with you. But you saw a big push to cut Santorum down so that Obama could be President. Many even said they would rather Obama over Santorum. I am not taking chances this time. Many of the folks here supported Newt instead of Santorum knowing full well that Newt didn’t have a chance.
“You are correct. Governor walker actually runs a state. Candidates Paul, Cruz, Rubio, Santorum, etc are senators where all they do is a lot of speeches. “
we need a candidate who can articulately make his case, and who isn’t afraid to tell the MSM where to go. Cruz is that man, i believe.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.