Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

We Have Finally Traced The TRUE Origin Of Muhammad In Islam
www.youtube.com ^ | January28,2026 | EVENTS -&- HISTORY

Posted on 02/09/2026 7:15:40 PM PST by Jonty30

In this eye-opening investigation, we follow the hard evidence to uncover the true origin of Muhammad in early Islamic history. By examining ancient coins, rock inscriptions, Qur’an manuscripts, and non-Islamic historical sources, this video challenges the traditional narrative and asks difficult but necessary questions. Was “Muhammad” originally a personal name—or a title? Why do early inscriptions and coins feature crosses, Greek text, and anti-Trinitarian theology? And why is there a striking silence about Islam and Mecca in the earliest records?

This presentation traces how Islam appears to emerge gradually out of late antique Christian theological conflicts, not overnight. Whether you’re a student of history, theology, or comparative religion, this video will push you to rethink what you thought you knew. Watch carefully—because the evidence tells a very different story.


TOPICS: Apologetics; Current Events; History; Islam; Theology
KEYWORDS: islam; mecca; muhammad; prayer; religion
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-45 next last
In a nutshell, Arianism may be responsible for the rise of Islam.

He makes a good case and the video is worth watching by itself.

1 posted on 02/09/2026 7:15:40 PM PST by Jonty30
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Jonty30

Thanks. BFL


2 posted on 02/09/2026 7:24:11 PM PST by frog in a pot (Government recognition of same sex "wives" and same same-sex marriage is an act of child abuse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jonty30

Here is the home page for the speaker, Jay Smith:

https://youtube.com/@pfanderfilms?si=j-BYQ0RDUM_gaZH5


3 posted on 02/09/2026 7:28:16 PM PST by fishtank (The denial of original sin is the root of liberalism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fishtank

Appreciated.


4 posted on 02/09/2026 7:37:35 PM PST by Jonty30 (I always ask AI stupid questions to avoid the smart lists for elimination. I want to surprise it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Jonty30

Satan is responsible for the rise of Islam.


5 posted on 02/09/2026 7:40:03 PM PST by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is opinion or satire. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Ultimately, yes.
However, he can do nothing without cooperation from man.


6 posted on 02/09/2026 7:44:49 PM PST by Jonty30 (I always ask AI stupid questions to avoid the smart lists for elimination. I want to surprise it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

That’s absolutely true.


7 posted on 02/09/2026 7:46:00 PM PST by No name given ( Anonymous is who you’ll know me as )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Jonty30

Correct.


8 posted on 02/09/2026 7:46:08 PM PST by No name given ( Anonymous is who you’ll know me as )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Jonty30

The key point Smith makes is that at the time the Koran was (supposedly) set down, Arabic writing only used consonants - a written indication of vowels (those dots and squiggles above and below the curly-cues) had not yet been invented. So anytime one would see the consonants that are today interpreted as “Mohammed”, it could well be that those consonants actually stood for “Machmed” (or some such word) that was used as a designation for ‘the enlightened one’ (or something related) - a term that could be used for any of a host of individuals, including Christ himself.


9 posted on 02/09/2026 7:51:41 PM PST by Stosh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jonty30

Is this to be published in any academic journals or as a stand-alone book, or will it just appear on YouTube?


10 posted on 02/09/2026 8:14:17 PM PST by BusterDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BusterDog

Would the academic world want it published?


11 posted on 02/09/2026 8:16:10 PM PST by Jonty30 (I always ask AI stupid questions to avoid the smart lists for elimination. I want to surprise it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Jonty30

Satan’s counterstroke to Jesus’ resurrection - an idolatrous religion that is a mirror image of Christianity that is actually a form of totalitarian government.


12 posted on 02/09/2026 8:30:59 PM PST by Some Fat Guy in L.A. (Still bitterly clinging to rational thought despite its unfashionability)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jonty30
Would the academic world want it published?

We should ask Salman Rushdie. He's been keeping an eye out for hostile reactions to emerging truths regarding Islam.

(Too soon?)

13 posted on 02/09/2026 9:22:07 PM PST by MikelTackNailer (The future isn't like I remembered it to be.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Arthur Wildfire! March; Berosus; Bockscar; BraveMan; cardinal4; ...
from the FRarchives:

14 posted on 02/09/2026 9:22:48 PM PST by SunkenCiv (TDS -- it's not just for DNC shills anymore -- oh, wait, yeah it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Jonty30

And then there is that generic Islamofascist made famous by El Rush-Bo:

Kareem Abdul Skyhook


15 posted on 02/09/2026 9:24:07 PM PST by Ronaldus Magnus III (Do, or do not, there is no try. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jonty30

bflv


16 posted on 02/09/2026 9:36:45 PM PST by sauropod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jonty30

A sewer in Mecca?


17 posted on 02/09/2026 9:41:44 PM PST by Sequoyah101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jonty30

Video Transcript Summary

The transcript is a presentation (likely by Dr. Jay Smith or a similar figure associated with PfanderFilms) arguing that the traditional account of Islam's origins in the 7th century—centered on a prophet named Muhammad from Mecca who received the Quran—lacks direct contemporary evidence and emerged much later.

Key points raised include:

The presentation frames this as evidence-based history challenging the "standard Islamic narrative," emphasizing physical artifacts (coins, inscriptions, manuscripts) over later texts, and concluding that the traditional story "arrives far later than the evidence it claims to explain." It ends with repeated affirmations of "Jesus is Lord."
18 posted on 02/09/2026 10:13:05 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (Democracy dies with Democrats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jonty30

Thats not true. He can do quite a bit without man involved in it.


19 posted on 02/09/2026 10:31:37 PM PST by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Jonty30

An item worth considering:

The Vatican Connection To Islam

https://jamesjpn.net/history/the-vatican-connection-to-islam/

” . . .Transcription
The year is 1999. Pope John Paul II gently bows and presses his lips to the Quran, the holy book of Islam. Cameras flash. The world gasps. Is it a gesture of peace? Or is it a signal to insiders?

Now rewind 13 centuries. A man kneels inside a cave on the edge of the Arabian desert. He’s trembling. Voices whisper in the dark. His name? Muhammad, his comforter. A wealthy woman with Christian connections. Her cousin? A Catholic scholar of the Gospels.

In that moment a new religion is born. But was it truly born of the desert? Or conceived in the shadows of Rome? This is not just another story about Islam. This is a journey into the hidden architecture of power. A forgotten story that stretches from Mecca’s sacred black stone to the marble halls of the Vatican.

You’ve been told that these two world religions are rivals. But what if they were never truly enemies? What if Islam, far from being Rome’s greatest opponent, was actually one of its greatest creations? The symbols, the rituals, the alliances, all point to one chilling conclusion.

What began as a spiritual movement may have been, from the very start, part of a master plan. A plan hatched in the smoke of incense behind curtains of secrecy and sealed with blood. The truth is not what it seems. And what you’re about to discover may change how you see history and prophecy forever.

First let’s acknowledge something important. The sincere devotion of Muslim believers. I remember Muslim students who prayed faithfully, lived modestly, and stood firmly for what they believed was right. They were honest, principled, and loyal. Loyal like few others. In their daily prayers and strict lifestyles they seek to honor God wholeheartedly.

These qualities command respect. Such commitment reminds us of the biblical Daniel, unwavering in worship even in a foreign land. One cannot help but admire their dedication and moral clarity. And yet even the most devoted followers can be in the dark about unseen influences.

One might ask, is it possible to be completely sincere, yet sincerely wrong? The love and zeal of these believers make the hidden story all the more tragic and all the more urgent to reveal.

Throughout history religions have often had two sides. One for the masses and a secret side known only to a few. The medieval Knights Templar, for example, outwardly appeared as devout Catholic monks, but inwardly many indulged in occult rituals of Luciferianism. They presented one face to the world and another to their inner circle.

Could something similar be happening within Islam? Could there be an inner circle guiding Islam from behind the scenes, just as there was in medieval Catholicism? It sounds like the plot of a novel, but think about it. Both Catholicism and Islam have mysterious elite orders and historic secrets. The Bible itself hints at a hidden power behind earthly kingdoms, a beast power centered in Rome.

Prophecy identifies Rome as the seat of great deception and control in the last days. Islam, on the surface, didn’t arise from Rome at all. Or did it? What if a Roman hand has been steering the course of Islam from the shadows, right from the very start? The stage is set. Let’s turn back the pages of time and see how this saga began.

Our journey leads us to the birth of Islam and its prophet Muhammad. In AD 570, as a young trader, Muhammad married a wealthy widow named Khadija when he was 25 and she was 40. But Khadija was no ordinary Arabian woman. She was raised in a noble trading clan, had Christian connections, and held monotheistic beliefs. Her cousin Waraka was a devout Roman Catholic too, even a scholar of the Gospels.

This means Muhammad’s closest confidants in his early years were deeply connected to the Catholic faith. Picture the scene. An Arab seeker marries a cultured woman of wealth, education, and strong religious connections. She employs and mentors him, convinced he might be chosen by God. It was Khadija who encouraged Muhammad to trust the mysterious spirit that spoke to him in a cave. The voice he said was the angel Gabriel bringing revelations.

Was it truly an angel of God? Muhammad himself was terrified at first. But with Khadija’s comfort and Waraka’s counsel, he became convinced that he was a prophet. It’s as if Rome’s influence was whispering in his ear from the very start.

Is it a coincidence that the very founder of Islam had a direct connection to the Roman church? Or was a groundwork being laid for a grand plan? The pieces of the puzzle were just beginning to form.

With Khadija’s support, Muhammad soon began preaching a new faith, Islam. He taught that there is only one God, Allah, and that all idols must be destroyed. His message challenged the paganism of Arabia. Facing opposition, Muhammad fled Mecca to Medina in 622, the Hijra, year one of the Islamic calendar. There he gathered followers, gained strength, and eventually marched back to conquer Mecca in 630.

Within a mere 20 years, this once obscure merchant became the leader of a revolutionary religious movement. By the time of his death in 632, most of Arabia bowed to Islam.

The holy book of Islam, the Quran, was compiled soon after, by about 650, from Muhammad’s recited revelations. Muslims believe the Quran was dictated word for word by God, straight from heaven. Such a claim made the new scripture unquestionable and unchangeable. But one must wonder, if Catholic influences were present in Muhammad’s household, could they have helped shape those early revelations? History does record that Muhammad had scribes to write down his visions, and one of them could have been Waraqa or someone under Catholic guidance.

It’s a haunting thought. In the midst of genuine zeal, could elements of another agenda have crept into the foundations of Islam? As Islam spread its wings over the desert sands, the stage was being set for an even deeper connection with Rome’s legacy.

Look closely at the symbol of Islam, a crescent moon embracing a single star. You see it on mosques and flags from Turkey to Pakistan. But this symbol did not originate with Muhammad. Its roots reach far back into ancient pagan worship.

Long ago in Arabia, before Islam, the moon god and sun goddess were worshipped together as divine lovers. The moon god, known as Allah among certain tribes, was said to have three daughters, Allat, Alluza, and Manat, revered as goddesses. Even archaeological finds and old encyclopedias confirm that Allah was a pre-Islamic name, used for a pagan deity corresponding to the Babylonian god Baal.

In other words, the very name Allah was not new. It was borrowed from a pagan past. The crescent and star symbol itself is found on ancient carvings of Baal and Ishtar, or in Egyptian depictions of Isis and Horus.

The crescent, representing the moon goddess’s womb, and the star or sun, representing the sun god’s offspring together, signified a divine birth, the male and female cosmic powers uniting. How remarkable that a faith claiming pure devotion to one god carried forward the very icon of an age-old fertility cult.

This raises a troubling question. Were these symbols adopted by accident or were they a sign of something lurking beneath Islam’s new monotheistic veneer? The ancient mystery religion of Babylon seems to echo in Islam’s flag. But Islam was not alone in using this emblem.

Amazingly, the Roman Catholic Church also uses the very same pagan emblem of the crescent and star, though it’s hidden in plain sight. . . “ . . .

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Again, information worthy of consideration.


20 posted on 02/10/2026 2:02:55 AM PST by Norski (Why is American no longer Christian? Because of CINO - christians in name only.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-45 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson