Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

From Operation Rescue to Operation Convert [Randall Terry now Catholic]
National Catholic registar ^ | 5/17/06 | TIM DRAKE

Posted on 05/17/2006 9:08:53 PM PDT by Full Court

font face="Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif" size="4" color="#990000">From Operation Rescue to Operation Convert


May 21-27, 2006
by TIM DRAKE
 

Also in the Register:

Randal Terry, CatholicRandall Terry has become Catholic.
Between 1987 and 1994, Randall Terry led Operation Rescue, the country’s largest peaceful civil disobedience movement. He now serves as president of the Society for Truth and Justice, and is running for a Florida Senate seat. One of the leading evangelical pro-life leaders in the country, Terry quietly entered the Catholic Church on Holy Thursday with his wife Andrea and three sons. Register senior writer Tim Drake spoke with Terry about his conversion at his home in Florida.

 Where are you from originally?
I grew up in upstate New York, in West Henrietta. We grew up in the country.

 Tell me about your family.
I was conceived out of wedlock in 1958. Within three months my parents were married, and I was born six months later. I’ve always had an affinity with babies born out of wedlock who are in danger of perishing. Had Roe v. Wade been the law of the land in 1958, I might not have been here, although I’m certain that my mother would have chosen life.
I have one brother who is four years younger. My parents were both career school teachers.

 What was your faith background?
I was baptized in the United Church of Christ in New York, but grew up in a nominal Christian home. We were barely Christmas and Easter Christians. From the time I was a little boy until I was 17, I was anything but devout. At times, I was a verifiable agnostic.

 How did you come to know Christ?
As a teenager, I had lived a life immersed in the rock ’n’ roll culture, away from the paths of God, but I had a real yearning in my heart to know ultimate truth and ultimate reality. That set my heart seeking after God in prayer and reading Scriptures and talking to people who were devout in their faith. On Sept. 6, 1976, I made an evangelical commitment to Christ as a 17-year-old.
In conjunction with my teenage rebellion, I was seeking to know if God existed, if heaven and hell and demons and angels existed. My prayer, journey, discussions and reading brought me to the point where I asked Christ to come into my life and be my Lord and savior. That brought an immediate change in my lifestyle, my speech, my relationships and my church attendance. I went from rarely going to church to going three times a week. I began to evangelize all of my former rock ’n’ roll buddies, many of whom became devout Christians. Some of them went into ministry as missionaries and pastors. Once I was convinced that Jesus was the Son of God and that he suffered and died for us, I was thrilled with the Good News and wanted to tell everyone that I knew — family, friends and foes.
It defined my life from that moment on. Two years later I enrolled in a Bible College in New York.

 How did you first get started in pro-life work?
While at a prayer meeting in the fall of 1983, a woman came into the meeting weeping. She said she had just seen a special on Christian television on abortion. She said, “We’ve got to pray that God ends this killing.”
Whenever I thought about abortion, I got a sick feeling in my stomach, yet my evangelical sociology did not allow me to be in the political and social battles of the day. I had very little historical and theological framework from which one could launch and sustain a socio-political movement.
I would think about abortion and pray, “Oh, God, please do something,” but wouldn’t know what to do.
Eventually, on May 1, 1984, I took a position in front of a Binghamton, N.Y., abortion business. I had no literature. I just stood there committed to talking to women who were entering, to beg for the life of their babies. From that grew Project Life — a crisis pregnancy center, and Operation Rescue.

 What led to the founding of Operation Rescue?
I met John Ryan, who was doing sit-ins in St. Louis, and my heart was stirred to participate in direct action. While sitting in jail in 1986, I had another epiphany about how to recruit masses of people. We recruited tens of thousands of people. Between 1987 and 1994, 75,000 arrests were made. That is 10 times the size of the arrests made during the years of protest for civil rights.

 How many times were you arrested?
More than 40 times, always for peaceful protest, like praying in front of an abortion business.

 When did you first take an interest in the Catholic Church?
It was during my work in Operation Rescue that I first became interested in the Roman Catholic Church. My training and experience were in evangelical Christianity with an evangelical framework theologically, but the Roman Catholic communion had a much better sociology and better stability, coupled with a phenomenal theology of suffering.
I would look at my evangelical friends, who would come and go from the pro-life movement. They would proclaim undying devotion for pro-life activism and then later disappear. Then I would look at my Roman Catholic friends who would never swerve. That had a tremendous magnetism for me.
I also found myself defending Catholics against ignorance and bigotry, and defending evangelicals against ignorance and bigotry.
What took me so long was that I was a cultural Protestant, trained in Protestant theology. I had to look at the parts of my training that were inaccurate or deficient. For the past six years, I have been in the Charismatic Episcopal Church. My conversion began with my friendships with clergy in this Church. They told me that the farther you go in Reformation theology, the more you end up in Catholicism and liturgy.

 Which theological hurdles were the most difficult for you to jump?
They boiled down to papal infallibility, Marian dogma, and purgatory. For years I have craved to be in the Catholic Church, but couldn’t figure a way to get around these hurdles. They became resolved this Lent.
On Ash Wednesday, I started a 40-day fast. I have been in conversation with a priest, Father John Mikalajunas, in Binghamton for over 20 years. To my amazement, during Lent, I sensed that it was the plan of the Holy Spirit to bring us into the Catholic Church. After some further conversations with Father Mikalajunas as well as with other evangelicals who had come into the Church, those theological issues evaporated. Once I realized the Truth, I had to go in. I couldn’t wait.

 I understand that you are awaiting word on the annulment of your first marriage. Can you tell me why you chose to be received into the Church (without being able to receive the Eucharist), before the resolution of your annulment?
This has been a journey for 18 years. I knew when I came in that I would have to deal with my annulment. I couldn’t bear not being in Rome any longer. So, I decided I would rather come in and wait to receive the Eucharist, rather than not be in the Church. I felt that I needed to come in, and that it was something I needed to do during Lent. Thus far it has been wonderful — I’m glad I didn’t wait.

 Tell me how your reception into the Church came about.
In my conversations with Father Mikalajunas, he would tell me that I belonged in Rome, and I would jokingly tell him that he would make a great Baptist preacher. I knew I was being pulled into Rome. At the beginning of Lent, he told me something that made a lightbulb go on. He said that he would receive me into the Church. He knew what I knew — he knew that I knew the dogmas of the Church. He was offering to receive us in the event that I could say, “Yes, I believe.”
I thought, “Oh my goodness,” and felt like the Holy Spirit was showing us a plan for our lives. Father Mikalajunas concurred.
Over Holy Thursday we were received and confirmed at St. John the Evangelist Catholic Church in Binghamton. Father Mikalajunas brought in two witnesses.
When I was confirmed, I had this overwhelming sense that I had just walked into a cathedral that was packed with people — namely, the heroes and martyrs and saints who had gone before us. I felt they were rejoicing and calling us on in our journey. I felt as if I was with these people.
There was a tremendous sense of joy realizing that it was the end of my ongoing struggles.

 What was your greatest fear?
That I would wake up and say there was no change in me. That has not been the case. Being in the Church has brought a wonderful sense of belonging. I am part of 2,000 years of Christian history that is glorious, that has warts, and heroes and villains, but that is nonetheless the Church founded by Jesus upon Peter.

 How do you expect your evangelical colleagues will react to news of your conversion?
My journey is so personal, and yet so public. An important part of my journey is that as a pro-life leader I have had the honor of leading tens of thousands of evangelicals and Catholics in pro-life activism. I pray that I am able to continue that leadership in both communities. We have a unity of purpose. We unite around the Apostles’ Creed and our common love of life and justice.
My mission as a man is to unite as many in the Christian community as possible to stand for the Christian ethic of life and justice as defined by our historical and common Christian faith.

 Do you anticipate that your conversion could hurt you in your Senate race in a predominantly Protestant state?
I hope it won’t. I believe that the unity of purpose that has helped me as an evangelical to work with Catholics will help me as a Catholic to work with evangelicals. My wife says that I am bilingual — I can speak both languages. What I would bring to the table as a state senator is standing up for the underdog for justice and freedom. Whether you’re Baptist or Episcopalian or Catholic, you can appreciate that.
We see that kind of working together in the example of a Presbyterian president [Ronald Reagan] working with a Polish priest [Pope John Paul II] to free Poland from communism. I am convinced that the two can work together in our common missions. If we don’t work together, we cannot win.

 



TOPICS: Activism; Apologetics; Catholic; Charismatic Christian; Current Events; Ecumenism; General Discusssion; History; Humor; Mainline Protestant; Moral Issues; Other Christian; Religion & Culture; Religion & Politics; Religion & Science
KEYWORDS: catholic; conversion; gayson; hero; operationrescue; prolife; randallterry; terry
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 381-400401-420421-440 ... 461-464 next last
To: vladimir998; Full Court
True, but irrelevant. Baptism is also obligatory.

No it wasn't. If you were not baptized then you went on with your life. Under the Abrahamic covenant if you were not circumcised you were cut off from your people.

Consequently, an eight day old infant had no say so in the matter and his parents decided for him, not wanting their offspring to be "cut off"(no pun intended). On the other hand , the requirements for baptism are prior repentance and belief, [Acts 16:30-33] [Acts 2:38]. These would be difficult requirements for an infant.

Acts 2:39 is sometimes used as justification for infant baptism.....it says just the opposite. Your children are included with everyone else who will in the future call on the Lord with repentance and belief.

Nonsense. It is reality. I posted the writings of the early Church fathers that attest to this.

Some of the writings of your early church fathers are very suspect. Error began creeping into the early church immediately after Pentecost.....multiple scriptures attest to this.

401 posted on 05/23/2006 2:53:34 PM PDT by Diego1618
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 399 | View Replies]

To: WKB

You wrote: "Unless your name is Jim Robinson or
Admin Moderator I'll post what ever I want
to. Thanks"

I merely told you there was no reason to post a supposedly corrected version of my post since there was no mistake. Apparently I struck a nerve. Gee, I sure hope you recover.


402 posted on 05/23/2006 5:06:22 PM PDT by vladimir998 (Ignorance of Scripture is ignorance of Christ. St. Jerome)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 398 | View Replies]

To: vladimir998
YOU WROTE:
"Look, I realize that you're a Protestant and therefore not really interested in learning about Christianity. "



Am I to take it from this statement you believe
That ONLY Catholics are Christians?
That ONLY Catholics are saved?

That ONLY Catholics will be in Heaven?

403 posted on 05/23/2006 5:16:03 PM PDT by WKB (D.L. Moody "The Bible was not written for your information, but for your transformation")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 402 | View Replies]

To: WKB

Since I wrote that sometime ago and you (or someone else) already responded to that post it seems strange for you to bring it up now, but to answer your questions:

No.

No.

Yes. Meaning of course that all those in heaven are Catholic no matter what they started out as. All those who are in heaven know the full truth. They are all Catholic. They may not have been Catholics one moment before entering heaven, however.

And my point still stands. Protestants are rarely interested in learning about Christianity so much as Protestant Christianity. This is why John Cardinal Newman, a former Protestant himself, once commented that to go deep into Church history is to cease to be Protestant.


404 posted on 05/23/2006 6:34:00 PM PDT by vladimir998 (Ignorance of Scripture is ignorance of Christ. St. Jerome)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 403 | View Replies]

To: vladimir998

Yes. Meaning of course that all those in heaven are Catholic no matter what they started out as. All those who are in heaven know the full truth. They are all Catholic



Well shoot that won't be any fun if
everyone is a Catholic.
I was hoping that God would make
everybody be the denomination they
talked about the worst while they were on earth.
Oh well, If I Catholic I must be then so be it.
At least I'll be in Heaven. That's the important part.


405 posted on 05/23/2006 7:22:03 PM PDT by WKB (D.L. Moody "The Bible was not written for your information, but for your transformation")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 404 | View Replies]

To: needlenose_neely
Well then, I guess you never sing hymnns then either.

I do.

I have just never bothered to learn any creeds, I never had any reason to.

406 posted on 05/23/2006 7:53:31 PM PDT by Full Court (¶Let no man deceive you by any means)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 392 | View Replies]

To: vladimir998; Diego1618
Christ sent the apostles out to preach and baptize.

But only to baptize believers.

407 posted on 05/23/2006 7:57:40 PM PDT by Full Court (¶Let no man deceive you by any means)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 399 | View Replies]

To: Campion

Too late!

Mrs. Yuleeyahoo


408 posted on 05/23/2006 8:02:50 PM PDT by yuleeyahoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: WKB

You wrote: "Well shoot that won't be any fun if
everyone is a Catholic.
I was hoping that God would make
everybody be the denomination they
talked about the worst while they were on earth."

God doesn't establish denominations. He established a Church.

"Oh well, If I Catholic I must be then so be it.
At least I'll be in Heaven. That's the important part."

Yes, it is. Let's hope you are there one day.


409 posted on 05/24/2006 5:31:28 AM PDT by vladimir998 (Ignorance of Scripture is ignorance of Christ. St. Jerome)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 405 | View Replies]

To: Full Court

You wrote: "But only to baptize believers."

So you say, but that isn't what Jesus said. And again we are back to the relationship to circumcision.


410 posted on 05/24/2006 5:37:15 AM PDT by vladimir998 (Ignorance of Scripture is ignorance of Christ. St. Jerome)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 407 | View Replies]

To: vladimir998
You know what? You could use a real good dose
of "lighten up" medicine.
Have a great day.
411 posted on 05/24/2006 5:40:13 AM PDT by WKB (D.L. Moody "The Bible was not written for your information, but for your transformation")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 409 | View Replies]

To: vladimir998; WKB
Yes. Meaning of course that all those in heaven are Catholic no matter what they started out as. All those who are in heaven know the full truth. They are all Catholic. They may not have been Catholics one moment before entering heaven, however.

One of my fellow Calvinists on this board (long since banned) used to have this as his signature line:

"Recognize that all true Christians will be Calvinists in glory...."

412 posted on 05/24/2006 8:42:26 AM PDT by Alex Murphy (Colossians 4:6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 404 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy

Yes. Meaning of course that all those in heaven are Catholic no matter what they started out as.
"Recognize that all true Christians will be Calvinists

Let's see now
::
Calvinists,Catholic,
Calvinists,Catholic,
Calvinists,Catholic,
Calvinists,Catholic,
Calvinists,Catholic,

I think I'll just stay a Baptist. :>)


413 posted on 05/24/2006 11:43:48 AM PDT by WKB (D.L. Moody "The Bible was not written for your information, but for your transformation")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 412 | View Replies]

To: WKB
I think I'll just stay a Baptist. :>)

Well, if you want to be that way - but don't expect either of us to share our drinks with you, once we're all in Heaven :P

414 posted on 05/24/2006 12:06:33 PM PDT by Alex Murphy (Colossians 4:6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 413 | View Replies]

To: xzins
Believe means "to have faith in."

Faith is defined in Hebrews 11

What does Hebrews 11 mean?

Words have meaning. Word comprise ideas and belief systems. Ideas and belief systems have consequences.

I am asking you what "to believe", "faith", etc, means from the entirety of Scripture, as explained in your own words.

415 posted on 05/24/2006 12:25:00 PM PDT by needlenose_neely
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 400 | View Replies]

To: Full Court
Well then, I guess you never sing hymnns then either.

I do.

I have just never bothered to learn any creeds, I never had any reason to.

I guess you don't really use the Bible all the time then huh.(wink)

416 posted on 05/24/2006 12:33:56 PM PDT by needlenose_neely
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 406 | View Replies]

To: needlenose_neely

Well, my KJV doesn't have any creeds in it that I know of and my church doesn't recite any, so why would I need to know a creed?


417 posted on 05/24/2006 12:39:43 PM PDT by Full Court (¶Let no man deceive you by any means)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 416 | View Replies]

To: Full Court

Sure it does. In ACts.


418 posted on 05/24/2006 12:42:46 PM PDT by needlenose_neely
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 417 | View Replies]

To: needlenose_neely

What is it?


419 posted on 05/24/2006 12:47:29 PM PDT by Full Court (¶Let no man deceive you by any means)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 418 | View Replies]

To: WKB; Alex Murphy

Would that be a Calvinist Baptist?


420 posted on 05/24/2006 1:19:30 PM PDT by Gamecock ("False ideas are the greatest obstacles to the reception of the gospel." Machen predicting Osteen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 413 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 381-400401-420421-440 ... 461-464 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson