Skip to comments.
3 Philadelphia Priests Defrocked
AP ^
| April 7, 2006
Posted on 04/07/2006 6:36:09 PM PDT by NYer
Three more priests accused of sexually abusing children have been defrocked, bringing to 17 the number of priests in the Philadelphia Archdiocese who have been defrocked since the clergy abuse scandal broke four years ago.
The Vatican defrocked Edward V. Avery, Stanley M. Gana and James E. McGuire over credible allegations of abuse, the archdiocese announced in a notice Thursday inside its weekly newspaper, the Catholic Standard & Times.
None of the 17 priests faces criminal charges because of Pennsylvania's statute of limitations for prosecuting sex crimes. Avery, Gana and McGuire were named in a grand jury report released in September that identified 63 archdiocesan priests as abusers.
"This does nothing to address the broader issue that they broke the law and they escaped prosecution because the statute of limitations is so short," said John Salveson, a leader of the national advocacy group Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests and Other Clergy.
Avery, Gana and McGuire were stripped of their ministries in 2002 and 2003. They could not be located for comment.
According to the grand jury report, McGuire was found to have molested at least three boys, starting from when he was a seminarian in 1966. Avery allegedly abused a 12-year-old boy in the late 1970s. Gana, at one time a chaplain for the Boy Scouts of America, allegedly had so many victims that the grand jury could characterize the number only as "countless."
An archdiocese spokeswoman declined to comment.
TOPICS: Activism; Catholic; Current Events; General Discusssion; Moral Issues; Religion & Culture
KEYWORDS: catholic; defrock; dismissal; pa; philadelphia; vatican
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
1
posted on
04/07/2006 6:36:13 PM PDT
by
NYer
To: american colleen; Lady In Blue; Salvation; narses; SMEDLEYBUTLER; redhead; Notwithstanding; ...
I've lost count. It seems that since the election of Joseph Ratzinger as pontiff, the Vatican has been working overtime on this issue. Between cleaning up this mess and visiting the seminaries, this should be most encouraging to new candidates to the priesthood.
2
posted on
04/07/2006 6:39:04 PM PDT
by
NYer
(Discover the beauty of the Eastern Catholic Churches - freepmail me for more information.)
To: NYer
Priests don't molest children.
Pedophiles do.
3
posted on
04/07/2006 6:41:00 PM PDT
by
baltodog
(R.I.P. Balto: 2001(?) - 2005)
To: NYer
I am very encouraged by the work that the Pope is doing.
4
posted on
04/07/2006 6:42:55 PM PDT
by
Bahbah
(Harry Reid is a Liar;Ted Kennedy is a BIG FAT Liar: edited by tiredoflaundry)
To: baltodog
Priests don't molest children.Pedophiles do.
In most of the cases they were gays homosexuals, not pedophiles.
5
posted on
04/07/2006 7:01:08 PM PDT
by
Robertsll
To: Robertsll
Same thing, then:
Homosexuals don't molest kids, pedophiles do.
The only statement I am trying to make is that being gay, straight, Catholic, Southern Baptist, black, white, etc, does not mean you are going to molest children.
Pedophiles molest kids, no one else.
6
posted on
04/07/2006 7:11:32 PM PDT
by
baltodog
(R.I.P. Balto: 2001(?) - 2005)
To: baltodog
Pedophiles molest
pre-pubescent children.
Very few of the victims were pre-pubescent children. The vast, vast majority of the victims were minors. Thus the offenders were homosexual.
7
posted on
04/07/2006 7:18:17 PM PDT
by
Robertsll
To: baltodog
Sorry, you're wrong. Most of these guys were ephebophiles - that is, those interested in young men (adolescents). In other words, gay men.
This has been covered up by the pro-gay press. The priests involved were not in general out there molesting 6 year olds - which would have made them pedophiles. They were out there seducing or coercing 13-18 yr old males, which makes them homosexual ephebophiles.
8
posted on
04/07/2006 7:21:33 PM PDT
by
livius
To: baltodog
Pedophiles molest kids, no one else.
Clinically speaking, a guy who molests a 12 year old boy is a homosexual ephebophile. Most of the vile creatures among the priesthood who were guilty of sex abuse were exactly this: homosexual ephebophiles--who, by the way, would have approved of Elton John's little number with the stripping cub scouts not too long ago.
9
posted on
04/07/2006 7:47:21 PM PDT
by
Antoninus
(I don't vote for liberals regardless of their party affiliation.)
To: NYer
10
posted on
04/07/2006 7:48:58 PM PDT
by
onyx
(It's easier to indict a ham sandwich or Tom DeLay than it is to indict a Democrat.)
To: Robertsll
In most of the cases they were gays homosexuals, not pedophiles.Dittos
11
posted on
04/07/2006 7:53:12 PM PDT
by
vox_freedom
(Fear no evils)
To: Antoninus
Clinically speaking not all 12 year old boys are post pubescent.
To: NYer
Now if he would only remove Bishop Lynch in Florida. Bishops who oppose Rome need to be removed as well. Lynch is a pathetic shepherd.
13
posted on
04/07/2006 9:43:33 PM PDT
by
Ohioan from Florida
(The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.- Edmund Burke)
To: NYer
This sounds good -- is anyone keeping a count? LOL!
You have FReepmail.
14
posted on
04/07/2006 10:16:41 PM PDT
by
Salvation
(†With God all things are possible.†)
To: Ohioan from Florida
And Flynn in Minnesota.
And Mahony in California.
And
and
and
15
posted on
04/07/2006 10:20:41 PM PDT
by
Salvation
(†With God all things are possible.†)
To: NYer
Get rid of them..but prosecute them too. What they committed was horrendous and the spokesperson should, say so...but instead "declined comment"
16
posted on
04/07/2006 10:21:19 PM PDT
by
eleni121
('Thou hast conquered, O Galilean!' (Julian the Apostate))
To: Salvation
Absolutely! May God bless the Holy Father! There is much work to be done!
17
posted on
04/07/2006 10:41:00 PM PDT
by
Ohioan from Florida
(The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.- Edmund Burke)
To: baltodog
Pedophiles molest children
Ephebophiles molest teenagers
BIG difference.
18
posted on
04/08/2006 6:14:35 AM PDT
by
ninenot
(Minister of Membership, Tomas Torquemada Gentlemen's Club)
To: Robertsll
According to the John Jay Commission, the ratio was about 6:1 (male to female victims)
19
posted on
04/08/2006 6:15:35 AM PDT
by
ninenot
(Minister of Membership, Tomas Torquemada Gentlemen's Club)
To: A.A. Cunningham
Clinically speaking not all 12 year old boys are post pubescent.
Fair enough. But many are. And 12 was near the baseline for abuse. Many of the abused boys were older. Most were somewhere between 12 and 18.
20
posted on
04/08/2006 10:48:06 AM PDT
by
Antoninus
(I don't vote for liberals regardless of their party affiliation.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson