Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Free Republic LLC filed a Notice of Claim with the City of Fresno
Press Release Charles L. Doerksen, Attorney at Law | 09/22/03 | Jim Robinson

Posted on 09/22/2003 5:52:05 PM PDT by Jim Robinson

CHARLES L. DOERKSEN
ATTORNEY AT LAW
________________

ROWELL BUILDING
2100 Tulare Street, Suite 410
Fresno, California 93721
Telephone 559 233 3434
Facsimile 559 233 3939
E-mail doerksen@lightspeed.net

 

September 22, 2003

 

PRESS RELEASE

At 9:10 a.m. today, Free Republic LLC filed a Notice of Claim with the City of Fresno, arising from the Human Relations Commission’s news release of September 12, 2003, labeling it a "hate group." A copy of the Notice of Claim, without exhibits, is attached hereto.

The Notice of Claim, which is a legally required first step in filing a lawsuit against a public entity, puts the City of Fresno on notice that Free Republic LLC intends to file a lawsuit for defamation against (1) the City of Fresno, (2) the Human Relations Commission, and (3) Debbie Reyes, Chair of the Human Relations Commission.

Questions regarding this matter may be directed to this office, and additionally, Mr. Doerksen, as well as representatives of Free Republic LLC, can be made available in front of City Hall at 4:00 p.m., today, September 22, 2003, to answer questions if interest in this is expressed.

 

NOTICE OF CLAIM
(Government Code § 900, et seq.)

This claim is being presented pursuant to Government Code Section 900, et seq., Miller v. Hoagland (1966) 247 Cal.App.2d 57, 61-62 (filing claim as prerequisite for defamation action against public entity and its employees), and all pertinent code sections, statutes and laws of the State of California.

A. NAME AND ADDRESS OF THE CLAIMANT:

B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON TO WHOM CLAIMANT DESIRES

NOTICES TO BE SENT:

C. DATE, PLACE AND OTHER CIRCUMSTANCES GIVING RISE TO THE

CLAIM:

Claimant is an independent, grass-roots, conservative organization. Its purpose is to root out political fraud and corruption, to roll back decades of governmental largesse, and to champion causes which further conservatism in the United States of America.

This claim arises from defamatory oral statements and/or more permanent publications made by and/or disseminated by the City of Fresno, by and through its Human Relations Commission, and certain public employees and/or agents of the City of Fresno acting in the course and scope of their employment and/or agency, the identities of which are currently unknown (hereinafter, collectively the "City of Fresno"). Claimant is informed and believes, and thereon alleges, that the Human Relations Commission for the City of Fresno is composed of up to 17 members appointed by the City Council and the Mayor, and has a budget for the 2003 fiscal year estimated at $193,100. Each Council member appoints two members while the Mayor appoints three members. The specific identities of such public employees/agents are currently unknown, but are expected to include, at a minimum, Debbie Reyes, Chair, Human Relations Commission for the City of Fresno.

On or about September 12, 2003, the City of Fresno disseminated a News Release entitled, "Human Relations Commission News Release," a true and correct copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and made a part hereof (hereinafter, the "Release"). The Release refers to claimant as "a hate group." In addition, the Release states: "This group has also planned a ‘Free Republic Hate Rally Picnic’ in District 6," and accuses claimant of making "threats of violence toward any minority groups that interfere with their rally or picnic." The Release constitutes a false and unprivileged fixed representation to the eye which exposes claimant to hatred, contempt, ridicule, or obloquy, causes it to be shunned or avoided, and has a tendency to injure claimant in its occupation, trade or business. In addition, the Release charges claimant with a crime in that it accuses claimant of making "threats of violence" towards minority groups.

Claimant is informed and believes, and thereon alleges, that the City of Fresno has made other false and unprivileged statements, either orally or by writing, printing, or other more permanent medium, which have exposed claimant to hatred, contempt, ridicule, or obloquy, and which have caused claimant to be shunned or avoided, and have injured it in its occupation, trade or business. (As used in this Notice of Claim, the term "Publication" shall hereinafter refer to the Release as well as to all other defamatory oral statements and/or more permanent publications made by and/or disseminated by the City of Fresno.)

D. CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES:

Defamation. The City of Fresno (previously defined to include the City of Fresno, and certain public employees and agents of the City of Fresno acting in the course and scope of their employment and/or agency, the identities of which are currently unknown), wrongly referred to claimant as "a hate group" and accused claimant of planning a "hate rally" and making "threats of violence toward any minority groups that interfere with their rally or picnic," notwithstanding the City of Fresno’s failure and inability to produce even a scintilla of competent evidentiary or legal support for such defamatory statements. True and correct copies of articles from The Fresno Bee, dated September 14 and 16, 2003, are attached hereto as Exhibit "B" and "C," respectively, and made a part hereof (hereinafter, the "Articles"). The Articles attribute statements to Mayor Autry that (1) there is no evidence that claimant is a hate group, (2) the Human Relations Commission is "using the City of Fresno as a tool to attack people without cause," (3) describing the Publications as "inflammatory, reckless, irresponsible and dangerous," and (4) explaining "the worst thing you can say is they’re a hate group." Furthermore, Debbie Reyes, Chair, Human Relations Commission for the City of Fresno, has admitted that her "proof" for making the Publications was not "solid." (See Fresno Bee article dated September 16, 2003.)

The Publications are false and unprivileged statements, either orally or by writing, printing, or other more permanent medium, which have exposed claimant to hatred, contempt, ridicule, or obloquy, and which have caused claimant to be shunned or avoided, and have injured it in its occupation, trade or business. As a result of the defamatory Publications, claimant is entitled to be compensated by the City of Fresno (and the responsible public employees/agents).

The Publications constitute defamation (i.e. libel and/or slander per se) based upon Civil Code Sections 45 and 46 (as well as other statutory and judicial authority):

    1. Libel. The California Legislature has defined libel as a "false and unprivileged publication by writing, printing, picture, effigy, or other fixed representation to the eye, which exposes any person to hatred, contempt, ridicule, or obloquy, or which causes him to be shunned or avoided, or which has a tendency to injure him in his occupation." (Cal. Civ. Code § 45.)

    2. Slander. The California Legislature has defined slander as "a false and unprivileged publication, orally uttered, and also communications by radio or any mechanical or other means which: (1) Charges any person with crime, or with having been indicted, convicted, or punished for crime; … (3) Tends directly to injure him in respect to his office, profession, trade or business, either by imputing to him general disqualification in those respects which the office or other occupation peculiarly requires, or by imputing something with reference to his office, profession, trade, or business that has a natural tendency to lessen its profits." (Cal. Civ. Code § 46.)

E. AMOUNT OF CLAIM:

Claimant seeks general damages for loss of reputation, shame and mortification. Claimant seeks special damages with respect to damages it has suffered to its business, trade, profession or occupation. Finally, claimant requests exemplary damages for the sake of example and by way of punishing the responsible public employees/agents for making the defamatory Publications with actual malice. Claimant is informed and believes, and thereon alleges that the public employees/agents possessed a state of mind arising from the ill will toward the claimant, and did not have a good faith belief in the truth of the defamatory Publications. Accordingly, the acts of public employees were made with actual malice, and were fraudulent and justify the imposition of punitive damages.

Claimant’s damages are currently unknown, but are anticipated to be well in excess of $1,000,000, but regardless, are in excess of the minimal jurisdictional limits of an unlimited civil case.

F. WITNESSES/PUBLIC EMPLOYEE(S) CAUSING INJURY:

At this time, claimant believes that the following persons, in addition to its members (including but not limited to Jim Robinson), would have knowledge regarding the events of this claim and/or participated in the acts and/or omissions which caused the injury to claimant:

Dated: September ___, 2003



TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; Announcements; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: banglist; cityoffresno; claim; debbiereyes; freerepublic; fresno; fresnosuit; hategroup; hrc
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 701-710 next last
To: Jim Robinson
bump
81 posted on 09/22/2003 6:16:17 PM PDT by yonif ("If I Forget Thee, O Jerusalem, Let My Right Hand Wither" - Psalms 137:5)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BossLady
Yeah!
82 posted on 09/22/2003 6:16:29 PM PDT by vikingchick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
GOOD!!!

Make them think twice before they try to defame Free Republic. Their action brings reaction!

83 posted on 09/22/2003 6:17:15 PM PDT by Exit148
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
VRWC BTTT!
84 posted on 09/22/2003 6:19:06 PM PDT by Brad’s Gramma (Have YOU had your Logan Fix today? Hehe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie
AFAIK Alan Autry acted in an honorable manner. How do you think this lawsuit affects his political prospects?

Mayor Autry was very much on our side, and hopefully this will not effect him at all, except to show he is on the side of citizen's exercising their rights to free speech.

85 posted on 09/22/2003 6:19:18 PM PDT by ladyinred (The left have blood on their hands.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
Pictures coming up soon!
86 posted on 09/22/2003 6:20:03 PM PDT by ladyinred (The left have blood on their hands.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
With all this copyright BS we have to put up with about time the shoe is on the other foot. Maybe they will think twice before they erronously label FR.
87 posted on 09/22/2003 6:20:39 PM PDT by Orange1998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson; notpoliticallycorewrecked
You also made the Channel 24 news but I didn't hear the entire report.
88 posted on 09/22/2003 6:20:56 PM PDT by Canticle_of_Deborah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
Get them.
89 posted on 09/22/2003 6:21:10 PM PDT by DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet ("Mary, help!" - General Wesley Clark, presidential candidate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
Do you mean that I have been contributing to a HATE group? I was misinformed. I thought I was contributing to a conservative forum that celebrates diversity through discussion, debate and the occasional ZOT parade. I may have to rethink my contributions, which I hope results in no economic damage...;D
90 posted on 09/22/2003 6:21:54 PM PDT by Dutchgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
Robinson made a good point on the NEWS. He said that if the site is labeled as a hate site, people might stop using it. I hadn't considered that line of reasoning, and I think it's a GOOD one!
91 posted on 09/22/2003 6:22:11 PM PDT by Enterprise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: notpoliticallycorewrecked
I just saw the news report from 47. The report was biased for the city any against us.

It sure was! I just caught the tail-end of the 24 news coverage of the suit filed and, from what I heard, once again they gave the story fair, unbiased coverage.

92 posted on 09/22/2003 6:22:11 PM PDT by Mama_Bear ( Lori)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
Good start.
93 posted on 09/22/2003 6:22:18 PM PDT by unsycophant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
Just heard Debbie Reyes' response to FR's action paraphrased on KMJ radio.

She is paraphrased as unrepentant and angry at the City of Fresno's criticism of her's and the commissions' actions.

94 posted on 09/22/2003 6:23:20 PM PDT by Amerigomag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson; JennieOsborne; /\XABN584; 10mm; 3D-JOY; 5Madman; <1/1,000,000th%; 11B3; 1Peter2:16; ..
BTTT !! Go Jim Go !!!
95 posted on 09/22/2003 6:23:41 PM PDT by davidosborne (www.davidosborne.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chad Fairbanks; 007Dawg; 11B3; 123easy; 1911A1; 7mmMag@LeftCoast; A44MAGNUT; Acrobat; ...
Can you shamelessly abuse your washington state ping list?

I will ...



Please let me know if you want ON or OFF my Washington State ping list!. . .don't be shy.


96 posted on 09/22/2003 6:23:46 PM PDT by MeekOneGOP (Check out the Texas Chicken D 'RATS!: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/keyword/Redistricting)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
Good move!
97 posted on 09/22/2003 6:23:55 PM PDT by BunnySlippers (I'm voting for Arnold. McClintock doesn't deserve my vote!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ladyinred
I wonder how much money the City of Fresno makes from the military each month.
Yet they condone attacking active duty military FReepers and their families and supporters.
How many of the City of Fresno staff have gone to Iraq, or Afganistain?
98 posted on 09/22/2003 6:23:59 PM PDT by 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub (THANK YOU TROOPS, PAST AND PRESENT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: Roscoe
Is it too late for a class action by users? :)

I want in, I've been slandered.

99 posted on 09/22/2003 6:25:07 PM PDT by NeoCaveman (Wesley Clark is to Eisenhower, what a Yugo is to a Ferrari)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
Bump!
100 posted on 09/22/2003 6:25:17 PM PDT by Angelwood (FReepers are Everywhere! We Support Our Troops! (Hillary's VRWC))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 701-710 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson