Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

OUI, OUI: ARNOLD PUMPS UP ORGIES AND DOPE IN '77 SHOCK INTERVIEW
Drudge Report ^

Posted on 08/27/2003 3:59:45 PM PDT by journey7873

Posted on Drudge and Smoking Gun: The California recall campaign is officially getting dirty...


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: 26kdollarwelfaretom; arnold; big10inch; bobmulholland; bustamentebooster; disgusting; drudgethinksfriswhat; gain4inchesovernight; lookingforbooty; moretocome; morons; schwarzenpervert; schwarzenrino; sick; theorgycandidate; vote4character; vote4mcclintock; warningshot; wodlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 681-685 next last
To: journey7873
This whole thing seems... fishy. I mean, the interview was awfully descriptive for a guy who wasn't fluent in English for years into the 80's...

To be honest, I really don't care about this revelation. Does anyone expect someone living in his lifestyle to have an innocent history? Not that I am condoning it, but I could give two figs for this (or Bush's drug/alchohol past). I am voting for these candidates today, not 20 years ago. If this all happened in 1997 I would be much more concerned...
41 posted on 08/27/2003 4:16:42 PM PDT by Middle Aged White Male
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: journey7873
Lucky bastard!
42 posted on 08/27/2003 4:16:49 PM PDT by Destro (Know your enemy! Help fight Islamic terrorisim by visiting www.johnathangaltfilms.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Porterville
Yeah, that means in the 70's he lived his 20's

Still an adult.

43 posted on 08/27/2003 4:17:11 PM PDT by gdani
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: f.Christian
That's kind of a half truth there FC. His "appreciation" of the homosexuals who liked his body (by his own explanation) was because they were buying magazines he was appearing in, which was driving up sales, which in turn was driving up his appearance fee.

Most smart business men appreciate people that make them money.
44 posted on 08/27/2003 4:17:17 PM PDT by discostu (just a tuna sandwich from another catering service)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: ejdrapes
What is the point of bringing up something Arnold said 26 years ago? People change. They grow up, get married, have children.

"It is all about sex! Nothing to see here, move on."

Would love to see the responses here if the man giving that interview was one William Jefferson Blythe Clinton.

45 posted on 08/27/2003 4:18:30 PM PDT by ambrose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
It is slander to use such fodder in a manner as if it still has relevance today. If you think that such a disingeuous ploy to disparage the man isn't a slanderous I'm sure that your fine with the people whom tried to take advantage of GWB past indiscretions in which he to has admitted to and atoned for.

46 posted on 08/27/2003 4:18:43 PM PDT by Tempest (Tom McNader, Cruz Bustamante couldn't have asked for a better friend.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Porterville
Enterprise: So, Mr. Schwarzenneger, what were you doing during the 70's?

Arnold: "Sex and pot."

Enterprise: I see. And you, Mr. Bustamante, what were you doing during the 70's?

Bustamante: "I was a member of a group which advocates violence and racism."

47 posted on 08/27/2003 4:18:54 PM PDT by Enterprise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: journey7873
LOL!!! Arnies a shoe in!!
48 posted on 08/27/2003 4:18:54 PM PDT by zarf (Dan Rather is god.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Windcatcher
BINGO, that is exactly correct, especially in hyper-sexed California... What a miss calculation.
49 posted on 08/27/2003 4:19:07 PM PDT by Porterville (Et tu liberal?? Et tu???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Windcatcher
What's dirty about it is the insinuation that he's unfit to serve as Governor. That somehow this makes him incapable of the job.

It's not dirty. He did these things. He publicly talked about them. It is perfectly legitimate to question his fitness for office based on this behavior. I clearly recall Bill Clinton getting a lot of heat for his drug use. Many candidates have been disqualified in the minds of the voters because of drugs and "immoral" behavior.

In California, I doubt that admitted marijuana usage (a long time ago) and a vigorous sex drive (in an unmarried man) will be seen as disqualifying. The language is what may put people off.

It may be ugly to watch, but it isn't dirty. Sometimes the truth can be painful.

50 posted on 08/27/2003 4:19:11 PM PDT by Earl B.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: AmericaUnited

I can't believe that the Dims are stupid enough to believe that this will cost Arnold votes. The Hispanic men just looked at this article and said to themselves, "Que hombre!"

All this is is a description of the life and good times of the world's most famous bodybuilder in Southern California in the 1970's. Jesus, as if nobody smoked pot back in those days. How many here survived a Dead concert without at least getting astral from the secondhand weed smoke?

I would be more embarrassed to admit that I had a Leisure Suit in my wardrobe in those days than to admit I smoked pot. Geez, this article is rather tame.

California politics has, imho, adopted the Cardinal Rule of Southern Politics: Don't get caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy.

Be Seeing You,

Chris

51 posted on 08/27/2003 4:19:37 PM PDT by section9 (To read my blog, click on the Major!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: gdani
Still an adult.

Still the 70's...

52 posted on 08/27/2003 4:19:53 PM PDT by Michael Barnes (carpe ductum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

Comment #53 Removed by Moderator

To: Enterprise
And the little round porker was probably chasing men, unlike Arnold who was chasing women.
54 posted on 08/27/2003 4:20:16 PM PDT by Porterville (Et tu liberal?? Et tu???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Porterville; All; BlackElk; TheAngryClam; churchillbuff; ElkGroveDan; Gophack; kellynla; ...
So he was a kid in the 70's, what was Bustamonte doing??? Huffington???? Davis???? The answer is the same for each.

Not Tom McClintock, or most decent conservatives for that matter.

55 posted on 08/27/2003 4:20:42 PM PDT by ElkGroveDan (It's time for Arnold to stop splitting the Republican vote and step aside for the good of the party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Middle Aged White Male
The interview was done after Pumping Iron was released, and he spoke nothing but english in the movie.
56 posted on 08/27/2003 4:20:44 PM PDT by sharktrager (There are 2 kids of people in this world: people with loaded guns and people who dig.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: journey7873
Anyone who has seen the movie Pumping Iron already knows this.
57 posted on 08/27/2003 4:21:21 PM PDT by TankerKC (If I can take a Creative Writing class, why can't I take Creative Spelling class?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tempest
It is slander to use such fodder in a manner as if it still has relevance today

Technically/legally, "slander" must be spoken & the words, etc in question must be false.

This is neither.

58 posted on 08/27/2003 4:22:35 PM PDT by gdani
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Earl B.
IIRC, what Clinton got a ot of heat for was his inability to admit that he had ever done anything wrong.

"I didn't inhale."

"I never had sexual relations with that woman..."
59 posted on 08/27/2003 4:22:56 PM PDT by EllaMinnow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
Did you see what this guy linked in yesterday?
60 posted on 08/27/2003 4:23:21 PM PDT by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 681-685 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson