To: Windcatcher
What's dirty about it is the insinuation that he's unfit to serve as Governor. That somehow this makes him incapable of the job. It's not dirty. He did these things. He publicly talked about them. It is perfectly legitimate to question his fitness for office based on this behavior. I clearly recall Bill Clinton getting a lot of heat for his drug use. Many candidates have been disqualified in the minds of the voters because of drugs and "immoral" behavior.
In California, I doubt that admitted marijuana usage (a long time ago) and a vigorous sex drive (in an unmarried man) will be seen as disqualifying. The language is what may put people off.
It may be ugly to watch, but it isn't dirty. Sometimes the truth can be painful.
50 posted on
08/27/2003 4:19:11 PM PDT by
Earl B.
To: Earl B.
IIRC, what Clinton got a ot of heat for was his inability to admit that he had ever done anything wrong.
"I didn't inhale."
"I never had sexual relations with that woman..."
To: Earl B.
I clearly recall Bill Clinton getting a lot of heat for his drug use. No...Clinton did no such thing...he said so...
See the difference?
68 posted on
08/27/2003 4:25:29 PM PDT by
smith288
(For every column Ann Coulter writes, liberals worldwide experience shrinkage)
To: Earl B.
I clearly recall Bill Clinton getting a lot of heat for his drug use.I recall Bill Clinton getting a lot of heat for not being candid about his drug use.
83 posted on
08/27/2003 4:29:09 PM PDT by
TankerKC
(If I can take a Creative Writing class, why can't I take Creative Spelling class?)
To: Earl B.
Get over it!
434 posted on
08/27/2003 7:36:58 PM PDT by
faithincowboys
(Are we going downhill like a snowball headed for Hell?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson