[Tempest]

It is slander to use such fodder in a manner as if it still has relevance today. If you think that such a disingeuous ploy to disparage the man isn't a slanderous I'm sure that your fine with the people whom tried to take advantage of GWB past indiscretions in which he to has admitted to and atoned for.

[gdani]

It is slander to use such fodder in a manner as if it still has relevance today

Technically/legally, "slander" must be spoken & the words, etc in question must be false.

This is neither.

[ambrose]

It is slander to use such fodder in a manner as if it still has relevance today.

Whether it has "relevance" today is up to each individual voter. Ever hear of the slogan "We Report, YOU Decide"?

Quite frankly, I am far far far more concerned about Ahnold's position on illegal immigration and taxes in 2003 than who he slept with in 1977. This is a distraction.