Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Seven Years Later: Was TWA Flight 800 a First Strike By Jihad Terrorists? (posted 7/17/03)
Capitalism Magazine ^ | July 17, 2003 | Scott Holleran

Posted on 07/17/2003 12:28:10 PM PDT by presidio9

It's been seven years since the July 17, 1996, crash of TWA Flight 800 near Long Island, New York, and the cause remains unknown; the lingering mystery of one of the nation's worst aviation disasters is now a forgotten media spectacle. The $ 40 million federal investigation concluded that the plane was probably brought down by a fuel tank explosion, leaving the question of the blast's origin unanswered. The unexplained explosion of TWA 800 claimed 230 lives.

Two days after the crash, Utah Sen. Orrin Hatch told CNN: "We're looking at somebody who either put a bomb on it or shot a missile, a surface-to-air missile." Sen. Hatch has yet to explain his early comments.

During the probe, investigators appeared to be trying to have it both ways; the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) was operating under the authority of the FBI, which was involved on the grounds that a crime might have caused the crash, though FBI investigator James Kallstrom refused to confirm or deny even one shred of criminal evidence.

The CIA, in a highly unusual procedure, was asked to produce a video to counter the missile theory. Kallstrom testified before Congress that the FBI had tracked "all air and waterborne vessels" in the area and conducted appropriate interviews.

Yet radar of the area in which the plane went down picked up four unidentified tracks. One of those, according to the NTSB, is consistent with a surface vessel moving at 30 knots; it was within three nautical miles of TWA 800 when the 747 exploded.

Most alarming, the NTSB reported that the puzzling radar track, which remains unidentified, continued to move after the plane broke apart. Nearly every boat within miles had rushed to the disaster area to assist any rescue efforts --- but not this vessel, which was directly underneath TWA 800 when it became crippled.

Skeptics questioned the investigation, including former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Thomas Moorer, a retired admiral, who added his name to those who believe a missile destroyed the plane.

Moorer -- joined by Vernon Grose, a former member of the National Transportation Safety Board -- expressed grave doubts about the investigation. "All the evidence," Moorer said, "would point to a missile."

At the time of the crash, 270 eyewitnesses reported seeing a streak of light. Nearly 100 eyewitnesses said that the streak of light *originated* from the earth's surface, contrary to the CIA's animated simulation.

There is also the case of M. Victoria Cummock, the Pan Am flight 103 widow was appointed by President Clinton to an aviation safety commission after the TWA disaster. Cummock refused to sign the commission's report and sued then-Vice President Al Gore, claiming that, despite Cummock's security clearance, she was denied access to classified information.

The authors of a new book, First Strike, posed the question of whether Islamic terrorists attacked the plane and their conclusions, based upon heaps of evidence systematically concealed, lost, damaged and ignored by the government, are disturbing.

In their preface, Emmy-winning writer and producer Jack Cashill and investigative reporter James Sanders, who was arrested for receiving stolen crash evidence from a whistleblower, quote Congressional Terrorist Task Force Director Yossef Bodansky following the disaster:

"The case of TWA 800 served as a turning point because of Washington's determination and to a great extent ability to suppress terrorist explanations and 'float' mechanical failure theories. To avoid such suppression after future strikes, terrorism-sponsoring states would raise the ante so that the West could not ignore them."

Bodansky's comments are dated 1999.

Whatever happened to TWA 800 and her 230 passengers and crew, the case ought not to be considered closed.

As one NTSB investigator reportedly asked, when overwhelmed by the swarm of federal agents in what was supposed to be an accident probe: "What do they know that I don't know?" Seven years after TWA 800 went down in flames, America still deserves a straight answer.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Editorial; Government; Miscellaneous; US: New York; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: flight800; twa800; twa800list
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-75 last
To: Pyro7480
Beirut in 1983 was their very first strike.

I'd say the first strike was at our Tehran Embassy in 1979. That's truly when the WOT began, though Carter didn't see it as such.

61 posted on 07/17/2003 10:08:04 PM PDT by squidly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: unoAmerican

I'm don't know what happened to TWA 800. But the idea that in this day and age you could swear an entire ship's company and whoever else in their chain of command who "knew" that they participated in a horrible accident to total secrecy is utterly ludicrous.

62 posted on 07/17/2003 10:21:13 PM PDT by GATOR NAVY (20 years in the Navy; never drunk on duty - never sober on liberty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Hazzardgate
If TWA 800 was an attack, it was damn successful that the government couldn't explain it, why hasn't there been more than one incident? If I were a Jihadist leader I'd be inclined to do this more often.

We'll never know, I'm afraid.

63 posted on 07/17/2003 10:30:58 PM PDT by oyez (Lets take back our neigborhoods.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: unoAmerican
If one wanted to go over the head of the President to start a shooting war wouldn't an attack on a jet presumably flying to Israel be a good start? After viewing the movie, "JFK", I do not put anything past the un-elected government. A coverup in this scenario would be the only way to preserve ones presidency without giving in to the forces determined to rule the nation.

I do not know if I believe it, but, just a thought for discussion.
64 posted on 07/17/2003 10:44:24 PM PDT by Final Authority
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
"Forgetting, for a moment, American 587? Sure, tails fall off of planes all the time..."

Good point. However, I mean there has never been another center fuel tank explosion before of since TWA-800. That fact alone should make the NTSB and FBI "conclusion" suspect. They refuse to look at the possibility of a shoe bomber on TWA-800. Why?

65 posted on 07/18/2003 4:41:56 AM PDT by NetValue (They're not Americans, they're liberal democrats!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
Duh.
66 posted on 07/18/2003 4:43:53 AM PDT by SevenDaysInMay (Federal judges and justices serve for periods of good behavior, not life. Article III sec. 1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #67 Removed by Moderator

Comment #68 Removed by Moderator

To: presidio9
Another WND post today
69 posted on 07/18/2003 9:13:50 AM PDT by bmwcyle (Here's to Hillary's book sinking like the Clinton 2000 economy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LiteKeeper
Ping. Hope you have a file in the database of yours for this.
70 posted on 07/18/2003 9:18:05 AM PDT by Calpernia (Runs with scissors.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Frank_Discussion

Obviously, this country caused a great deal of its own problems. In the late 1989, and through the years upto and including 1996, many middle eastern pilots came to the US seeking employment with the major airlines. I saw it. That is why the government came up with the emergency authority to revoke airman licenses. I deliberately witheld this comment until now. I have watched our great airlines hire many foreigners without needing to be citizens. This is food for thought. From "No truth in Media"


71 posted on 07/07/2004 11:47:57 AM PDT by no truth in media
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: OXENinFLA

Why does the government lie so. It is very distrubing to be lied to all the time.


72 posted on 07/07/2004 12:01:05 PM PDT by jpsb (Nominated 1994 "Worst writer on the net")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan
Over 240 witnesses saw the missle heading toward the plane........

We know people who saw the upward arc from their house at the beach. We've known them for decades (back to the 60s). Sober, non-political, regular people. I'll take their word for it.

73 posted on 07/07/2004 12:08:46 PM PDT by wtc911 (moderate islam is the swamp where evil festers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Pyro7480
Beirut in 1983 and World Trade Center Part I in 1993 were the first parts in the current jihad.

A quibble, but this comes up from time to time and it's not insignificant. The Marines in Beirut in '83 were armed and uniformed combatants in a war zone. A legitimate target.

Sure, we called them "peacekeepers" and they did originally enter the country to police a ceasefire. But the ceasefire collapsed, and the mission changed. The New Jersey, after all, was sitting offshore lobbing shells onto to bad guys ....

We clung to the fiction that the changed facts on the ground did not alter the Marines' status. That was a fatal mistake, as it led to security being lax. After all, no one was supposed to shoot at "peacekeepers."

Self-delusion is dangerous in war.

74 posted on 07/07/2004 12:22:00 PM PDT by sphinx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: no truth in media

"I deliberately witheld this comment until now."

For Almost A YEAR, Too! I'm betting you turned blue long ago. That's gotta be some kind of record.

That said, yeah, pilots for US air carriers should be US citizens, IMHO. Especially in the post-9/11 world.


75 posted on 07/07/2004 12:41:28 PM PDT by Frank_Discussion (May the wings of Liberty never lose a feather!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-75 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson